You can have your opinion and so can I. We all have our own preferences and standards to judge dramas. So why reply to my comment with negativity? Are you trying to insult or create conflict? Double standards I'm referring to in general. Have you personally criticised other viewers for liking or disliking a drama based on a ML or FL's appearance, or do you only respond when it refers to the FL? In any case, show some respect.
Interesting. So when i see many comments mentioning a ML's appearance whether they like it or not, it's perfectly fine, even encouraged. But when it's about the FL's appearance, suddenly it's a red flag. Spare me the double standards. So now we can't like or dislike a drama based on appearances? When actors and actresses apply for roles, aren't they also judged on appearances to get certain roles? Therefore, we can also like or dislike a drama partially based on appearance.
Dropped at episode 27. Too boring. First 17 episodes all politics. 18 to 25 with more romance. Now back to mostly politics. Don't know why it's rated 8.8. They have some good interactions, but still boring. I don't know how the last 8 episodes will go, but I'm guessing more politics and still boring.
So it's not really romance. It can't be when the FL is 80 and the ML 30. It's more about comedy, life, and fantasy. I don't know why they added romance in the genre.
That drama hasn't aired yet. Firstly, how do you know he's their son. Secondly, how do you know his parents have a sad ending when it hasn't begun airing?
But there's no romance. I'm passed episode 7 and the leads have barely met. How can there be romance when it's all about politics and hardly any screentime between them?