Are you this loud when other actors, especially actresses!!!, get bullied for no reason? Did you ever stand up…
Why not start from this case, if it is currently? According to your statement, he is 100% guilty. The message suggests that clear evidence has been provided, although this is not the case. If there had been real evidence, he would no longer be free but arrested, or at least he would have been investigated by the police/prosecutors. The so-called evidence could not even have been made public in a criminal case, because it is part of the investigation. Therefore, there is no case, there is no investigation, only news/rumors. And it even incites hatred, it does not express an opinion when composing an acrostic to declare someone a pedo**ile (you can find it further down the page), when references are made to posts by individuals, not official accounts, just to further tarnish the image or to induce the idea that he is guilty of the death of another person, without there being any evidence in this regard. Examples of similar situations were given, in which public pressure led to the su*c*de of people who, later, were proven not to have been guilty of what had been stated. This unjustified public opprobrium should not exist until the facts have been proven to be true.
Are you this loud when other actors, especially actresses!!!, get bullied for no reason? Did you ever stand up…
I have already answered. This is a start. Due to the person's notoriety, it has become known what happens to artists (and not only) who are subjected to public hatred. Such a practice cannot be accepted, no matter who it is directed against. How many more artists have to die before action is taken? If the system is corrupt and incompetent, is this the solution? Shouldn't all this stubbornness /fierceness be directed towards a constructive attitude of changing the system?
Perhaps the recent evolution of this country is attracting certain attacks incitement to hatred, because a divided society will be easily destroyed by those who led to the disunion. Divide et impera!
Some users are writing whole thesis in the comment section..
Some of those (me for example) writing these comments understood what was going on behind this manipulation of society and wanted to share it with those who don't know. It is to EVERYONE's benefit to know those manipulation techniques, because when there are manipulation techniques, there is also a hidden purpose.
Are you this loud when other actors, especially actresses!!!, get bullied for no reason? Did you ever stand up…
According to what you say, the reaction can be interpreted, but beyond this aspect there is no evidence to confirm the claims of those who accuse. Anyone can react wrong to public pressure, and that's what we want to draw attention to. Let this incitement to public hatred, this pressure from so-called fans, which leads to tragedies, stop. Whoever is guilty will be held accountable for his actions. But what do those gain who, through defamatory messages, without evidence or proof, affect a person who has not even been proven guilty? We are not on the side of immorality, but neither are we on the side of hatred. A society that does not wait for the judgment carried out by competent institutions and that is led by hatred is a society that has now reached the highest suicide rate. Do you agree with this?
Some users, who glance at what those they have blocked write, have some TOTALLY wrong interpretations of what is written. I'm not surprised that they don't understand the manipulation they are subjected to....
Are you this loud when other actors, especially actresses!!!, get bullied for no reason? Did you ever stand up…
And....wow. You're right, we don't have to be on KSH's side. This is just the beginning. We don't have to allow this cyberbullying practice to continue to claim victims. And people need to understand that they are being manipulated to exert pressure that leads to su*c*de, that they are being used to kill.
Kim soo hyun fans calling others as fake news pedaler, when these people were spreading fake news about Kim Soo…
Again an unverified claim: KSH's fans are spreading fake news that he donated money to the victims of a fire. What is the proof that the news comes from his fans? Again a claim that leaves room for an interpretation in favor of the one who wants to manipulate public opinion. Yes, the news existed. Who is the author? Is there evidence that he is one of the fans? If not, the message above is posted only as a manipulation technique. And in the end, is the news true or not? What is the real information?
I wish all the artists who have been harassed in the past online and beyond were as well supported as Kim Soo Hyun is now. All Korea has to do now is not to annihilate another artist, but to take a stand against this killing machine: the media and cyberbullying!
Accounts have recently appeared that are "Kim Soo Hyun fans" and are throwing mud at KSR. It's another miserable game. Those who are fans of Kim Soo Hyun, stand on the defensive and don't bother throwing dirt. Don't be so quick to judge fans. Fans don't throw sh*t at someone who's dead.
It's a typical case of manipulation, and so obvious, that I wonder how Koreans don't realize it...? I expected a higher IQ, considering their extraordinary achievements in many fields.
My opinion about the Kim Soo Hyun case is that...it's a manipulation to hide some really important issues that, if known, would not be accepted by the people. So what is the point of this scandal? .....that is clearly meant to manipulate public opinion. Wake up Korea!
Noam Chomsky - "10 strategies of manipulation" by the media Renowned critic and always MIT linguist Noam Chomsky, one of the classic voices of intellectual dissent in the last decade, has compiled a list of the ten most common and effective strategies resorted to by the agendas “hidden” to establish a manipulation of the population through the media. Historically the media have proven highly efficient to mold public opinion. Thanks to the media paraphernalia and propaganda, have been created or destroyed social movements, justified wars, tempered financial crisis, spurred on some other ideological currents, and even given the phenomenon of media as producers of reality within the collective psyche. But how to detect the most common strategies for understanding these psychosocial tools which, surely, we participate? Fortunately Chomsky has been given the task of synthesizing and expose these practices, some more obvious and more sophisticated, but apparently all equally effective and, from a certain point of view, demeaning. Encourage stupidity, promote a sense of guilt, promote distraction, or construct artificial problems and then magically, solve them, are just some of these tactics. 1. The strategy of distraction The primary element of social control is the strategy of distraction which is to divert public attention from important issues and changes determined by the political and economic elites, by the technique of flood or flooding continuous distractions and insignificant information. distraction strategy is also essential to prevent the public interest in the essential knowledge in the area of the science, economics, psychology, neurobiology and cybernetics. “Maintaining public attention diverted away from the real social problems, captivated by matters of no real importance. Keep the public busy, busy, busy, no time to think, back to farm and other animals (quote from text Silent Weapons for Quiet War ).” 2. Create problems, then offer solutions This method is also called “problem -reaction- solution. “It creates a problem, a “situation” referred to cause some reaction in the audience, so this is the principal of the steps that you want to accept. For example: let it unfold and intensify urban violence, or arrange for bloody attacks in order that the public is the applicant’s security laws and policies to the detriment of freedom. Or: create an economic crisis to accept as a necessary evil retreat of social rights and the dismantling of public services. 3. The gradual strategy acceptance to an unacceptable degree, just apply it gradually, dropper, for consecutive years. That is how they radically new socioeconomic conditions ( neoliberalism ) were imposed during the 1980s and 1990s: the minimal state, privatization, precariousness, flexibility, massive unemployment, wages, and do not guarantee a decent income, so many changes that have brought about a revolution if they had been applied once. 4. The strategy of deferring Another way to accept an unpopular decision is to present it as “painful and necessary”, gaining public acceptance, at the time for future application. It is easier to accept that a future sacrifice of immediate slaughter. First, because the effort is not used immediately. Then, because the public, masses, is always the tendency to expect naively that “everything will be better tomorrow” and that the sacrifice required may be avoided. This gives the public more time to get used to the idea of change and accept it with resignation when the time comes. 5. Go to the public as a little child Most of the advertising to the general public uses speech, argument, people and particularly
children’s intonation, often close to the weakness, as if the viewer were a little child or a mentally deficient. The harder one tries to deceive the viewer look, the more it tends to adopt a tone infantilising. Why? “If one goes to a person as if she had the age of 12 years or less, then, because of suggestion, she tends with a certain probability that a response or reaction also devoid of a critical sense as a person 12 years or younger (see Silent Weapons for Quiet War ).” 6. Use the emotional side more than the reflection Making use of the emotional aspect is a classic technique for causing a short circuit on rational analysis , and finally to the critical sense of the individual. Furthermore, the use of emotional register to open the door to the unconscious for implantation or grafting ideas , desires, fears and anxieties , compulsions, or induce behaviors ... 7. Keep the public in ignorance and mediocrity Making the public incapable of understanding the technologies and methods used to control and enslavement. “The quality of education given to the lower social classes must be the poor and mediocre as possible so that the gap of ignorance it plans among the lower classes and upper classes is and remains impossible to attain for the lower classes (See ‘ Silent Weapons for Quiet War ).” 8. To encourage the public to be complacent with mediocrity Promote the public to believe that the fact is fashionable to be stupid, vulgar and uneducated... 9. Self-blame Strengthen To let individual blame for their misfortune, because of the failure of their intelligence, their abilities, or their efforts. So, instead of rebelling against the economic system, the individual autodesvalida and guilt, which creates a depression, one of whose effects is to inhibit its action. And, without action, there is no revolution! 10. Getting to know the individuals better than they know themselves Over the past 50 years, advances of accelerated science has generated a growing gap between public knowledge and those owned and operated by dominant elites. Thanks to biology, neurobiology and applied psychology, the “system” has enjoyed a sophisticated understanding of human beings, both physically and psychologically. The system has gotten better acquainted with the common man more than he knows himself. This means that, in most cases, the system exerts greater control and great power over individuals, greater than that of individuals about themselves.
"Media manipulation refers to orchestrated campaigns in which actors exploit the distinctive features of broadcasting mass communications or digital media platforms to mislead, misinform, or create a narrative that advance their interests and agendas."
https://news.cnrs.fr/articles/how-social-networks-manipulate-public-opinion "How does this kind of online manipulation work? D. C.: Expanding an online presence, through accounts managed by robots or humans, gives the impression that more people support or reject a given idea than is actually the case. When we are undecided, we have a natural tendency to look at what others are thinking to form our own opinion. Suggesting that many people around you are supporting a given cause increases the probability that you will endorse it yourself. In addition, the artificial amplification of online activity makes it possible to manipulate the digital platforms’ recommendation algorithms, which then spread your content well beyond the circle of users who already share your ideas."
A very interesting study on manipulation techniques.
1. Golden Medalist is not under investigation! 2. When there is an investigation, it only means that there are suspicions, so the presumption of innocence remains. 3.When there is sufficient evidence, arrests are made. But even after that, there is a possibility that the opposite could be proven at trial; the presumption of innocence also governs the trial. 4. Any statement that leads to the interpretation that a person is guilty of committing a crime, which turns out to be untrue, is a FALSE STATEMENT and is punishable by law. 5.The other speculations and assumptions, as they have been exposed so far, prove to be MANIPULATION TECHNIQUES. These techniques are mastered by specially trained people and consist of reporting real circumstances but through an exposure made in a way that leads to the induction of a FALSE impression, intended to win public opinion by the one who makes the statement.
The first manipulation, the one in Eden, to induce doubt: "did God say?" YES, God had said! That "did he say?" is the serpent's manipulation technique. Then the AFFIRMATION appears: "determined that you will not die..." Who had determined that they would not die?
Journalists learn the technique of manipulating public opinion at college.
https://news.kbs.co.kr/news/mobile/view/view.do?ncd=8235042 An investigation means nothing! It's a group that is being investigated for tax evasion. Goldmedalist led the group's acquisition but you can't say that Goldmedalist is being investigated. So again, sparks...they're just lighting a fire. So, putting the two companies together in the context of a scandal is a manipulation technique. The first manipulation took place in the Garden of Eden.
And the claim that Garosero will make another revelation is nonsense since all the revelations so far have been false. Why isn't anyone investigating this?
Again, assumptions, opinions and rumors. So far, nothing concrete and decisive. Some crumbs for those who crave them.
8 
15 
2 
And it even incites hatred, it does not express an opinion when composing an acrostic to declare someone a pedo**ile (you can find it further down the page), when references are made to posts by individuals, not official accounts, just to further tarnish the image or to induce the idea that he is guilty of the death of another person, without there being any evidence in this regard.
Examples of similar situations were given, in which public pressure led to the su*c*de of people who, later, were proven not to have been guilty of what had been stated. This unjustified public opprobrium should not exist until the facts have been proven to be true.
If the system is corrupt and incompetent, is this the solution? Shouldn't all this stubbornness /fierceness be directed towards a constructive attitude of changing the system?
Anyone can react wrong to public pressure, and that's what we want to draw attention to. Let this incitement to public hatred, this pressure from so-called fans, which leads to tragedies, stop. Whoever is guilty will be held accountable for his actions.
But what do those gain who, through defamatory messages, without evidence or proof, affect a person who has not even been proven guilty?
We are not on the side of immorality, but neither are we on the side of hatred. A society that does not wait for the judgment carried out by competent institutions and that is led by hatred is a society that has now reached the highest suicide rate. Do you agree with this?
All Korea has to do now is not to annihilate another artist, but to take a stand against this killing machine: the media and cyberbullying!
Those who are fans of Kim Soo Hyun, stand on the defensive and don't bother throwing dirt.
Don't be so quick to judge fans. Fans don't throw sh*t at someone who's dead.
Noam Chomsky - "10 strategies of manipulation" by the media
Renowned critic and always MIT linguist Noam Chomsky, one of the classic voices of
intellectual dissent in the last decade, has compiled a list of the ten most common and
effective strategies resorted to by the agendas “hidden” to establish a manipulation of the
population through the media.
Historically the media have proven highly efficient to mold public opinion. Thanks to the media
paraphernalia and propaganda, have been created or destroyed social movements, justified
wars, tempered financial crisis, spurred on some other ideological currents, and even given
the phenomenon of media as producers of reality within the collective psyche.
But how to detect the most common strategies for understanding these psychosocial tools
which, surely, we participate? Fortunately Chomsky has been given the task of synthesizing
and expose these practices, some more obvious and more sophisticated, but apparently all
equally effective and, from a certain point of view, demeaning. Encourage stupidity, promote a
sense of guilt, promote distraction, or construct artificial problems and then magically, solve
them, are just some of these tactics.
1. The strategy of distraction
The primary element of social control is the strategy of distraction which is to divert public
attention from important issues and changes determined by the political and economic elites,
by the technique of flood or flooding continuous distractions and insignificant information.
distraction strategy is also essential to prevent the public interest in the essential knowledge
in the area of the science, economics, psychology, neurobiology and cybernetics.
“Maintaining public attention diverted away from the real social problems, captivated by
matters of no real importance. Keep the public busy, busy, busy, no time to think, back to
farm and other animals (quote from text Silent Weapons for Quiet War ).”
2. Create problems, then offer solutions
This method is also called “problem -reaction- solution. “It creates a problem, a “situation”
referred to cause some reaction in the audience, so this is the principal of the steps that you
want to accept. For example: let it unfold and intensify urban violence, or arrange for bloody
attacks in order that the public is the applicant’s security laws and policies to the detriment of
freedom. Or: create an economic crisis to accept as a necessary evil retreat of social rights
and the dismantling of public services.
3. The gradual strategy
acceptance to an unacceptable degree, just apply it gradually, dropper, for consecutive years.
That is how they radically new socioeconomic conditions ( neoliberalism ) were imposed
during the 1980s and 1990s: the minimal state, privatization, precariousness, flexibility,
massive unemployment, wages, and do not guarantee a decent income, so many changes
that have brought about a revolution if they had been applied once.
4. The strategy of deferring
Another way to accept an unpopular decision is to present it as “painful and necessary”,
gaining public acceptance, at the time for future application. It is easier to accept that a future
sacrifice of immediate slaughter. First, because the effort is not used immediately. Then,
because the public, masses, is always the tendency to expect naively that “everything will be
better tomorrow” and that the sacrifice required may be avoided. This gives the public more
time to get used to the idea of change and accept it with resignation when the time comes.
5. Go to the public as a little child
Most of the advertising to the general public uses speech, argument, people and particularly
children’s intonation, often close to the weakness, as if the viewer were a little child or a
mentally deficient. The harder one tries to deceive the viewer look, the more it tends to adopt
a tone infantilising. Why? “If one goes to a person as if she had the age of 12 years or less,
then, because of suggestion, she tends with a certain probability that a response or reaction
also devoid of a critical sense as a person 12 years or younger (see Silent Weapons for Quiet
War ).”
6. Use the emotional side more than the reflection
Making use of the emotional aspect is a classic technique for causing a short circuit on
rational analysis , and finally to the critical sense of the individual. Furthermore, the use of
emotional register to open the door to the unconscious for implantation or grafting ideas ,
desires, fears and anxieties , compulsions, or induce behaviors ...
7. Keep the public in ignorance and mediocrity
Making the public incapable of understanding the technologies and methods used to control
and enslavement. “The quality of education given to the lower social classes must be the poor
and mediocre as possible so that the gap of ignorance it plans among the lower classes and
upper classes is and remains impossible to attain for the lower classes (See ‘ Silent Weapons
for Quiet War ).”
8. To encourage the public to be complacent with mediocrity
Promote the public to believe that the fact is fashionable to be stupid, vulgar and
uneducated...
9. Self-blame Strengthen
To let individual blame for their misfortune, because of the failure of their intelligence, their
abilities, or their efforts. So, instead of rebelling against the economic system, the individual
autodesvalida and guilt, which creates a depression, one of whose effects is to inhibit its
action. And, without action, there is no revolution!
10. Getting to know the individuals better than they know themselves
Over the past 50 years, advances of accelerated science has generated a growing gap
between public knowledge and those owned and operated by dominant elites. Thanks to
biology, neurobiology and applied psychology, the “system” has enjoyed a sophisticated
understanding of human beings, both physically and psychologically. The system has gotten
better acquainted with the common man more than he knows himself. This means that, in
most cases, the system exerts greater control and great power over individuals, greater than
that of individuals about themselves.
"Media manipulation refers to orchestrated campaigns in which actors exploit the distinctive features of broadcasting mass communications or digital media platforms to mislead, misinform, or create a narrative that advance their interests and agendas."
"How does this kind of online manipulation work?
D. C.: Expanding an online presence, through accounts managed by robots or humans, gives the impression that more people support or reject a given idea than is actually the case.
When we are undecided, we have a natural tendency to look at what others are thinking to form our own opinion. Suggesting that many people around you are supporting a given cause increases the probability that you will endorse it yourself. In addition, the artificial amplification of online activity makes it possible to manipulate the digital platforms’ recommendation algorithms, which then spread your content well beyond the circle of users who already share your ideas."
A very interesting study on manipulation techniques.
2. When there is an investigation, it only means that there are suspicions, so the presumption of innocence remains.
3.When there is sufficient evidence, arrests are made. But even after that, there is a possibility that the opposite could be proven at trial; the presumption of innocence also governs the trial.
4. Any statement that leads to the interpretation that a person is guilty of committing a crime, which turns out to be untrue, is a FALSE STATEMENT and is punishable by law.
5.The other speculations and assumptions, as they have been exposed so far, prove to be MANIPULATION TECHNIQUES. These techniques are mastered by specially trained people and consist of reporting real circumstances but through an exposure made in a way that leads to the induction of a FALSE impression, intended to win public opinion by the one who makes the statement.
The first manipulation, the one in Eden, to induce doubt: "did God say?" YES, God had said! That "did he say?" is the serpent's manipulation technique.
Then the AFFIRMATION appears: "determined that you will not die..." Who had determined that they would not die?
Journalists learn the technique of manipulating public opinion at college.
An investigation means nothing! It's a group that is being investigated for tax evasion. Goldmedalist led the group's acquisition but you can't say that Goldmedalist is being investigated. So again, sparks...they're just lighting a fire.
So, putting the two companies together in the context of a scandal is a manipulation technique.
The first manipulation took place in the Garden of Eden.
And the claim that Garosero will make another revelation is nonsense since all the revelations so far have been false. Why isn't anyone investigating this?
Again, assumptions, opinions and rumors. So far, nothing concrete and decisive.
Some crumbs for those who crave them.