1
4
1
1
A Summary, Not a Story (Actual Rating: 0.5)
Watching this drama was like watching a very long recap - a surface-level overview that prioritizes conceptual ideas over meaningful execution. If you are expecting a compelling psychological study of a complex villain, set against the rich backdrop of a post-war Japan rebuilding itself, you will find yourself disappointed.
The show tried to do too much, and decided to solve their problem by heavily relying on us having prior knowledge of the public figure. Instead of, oh I don't know, focusing on active storytelling. The script spends barely minutes on the titular character’s actual formative years, immediately thrusting us into Hosoki Kazuko's adulthood when her persona is already fully established. From there, the plot settles into a repetitive, superficial cycle:
A business is established -> The audience is abruptly told the venture was a success in the next scene -> A hardship occurs that barely lasts and has our Hosoki still looking as impeccable as ever, then is followed immediately by another pivot to a new enterprise -> Rinse and repeat
Because we are not permitted to witness the labor behind her success or properly see the emotional fallout of her failures, Hosoki's supposed moral descent carries no dramatic weight. Not that there even IS a semblance of a moral descent to explore in the first place. By the time the drama reaches its crude conclusion, we are once again simply told that she is the villain, rather than being allowed to witness her evolution into one. Heck, we don't even get into fortune telling, her actual big business, until the last couple of episodes. And even then, it is just breezed through like it is a mere footnote.
Speaking of, the show starts off with Hosoki fiercely criticizing a woman for relying on men, advocating instead for female independence (ironically, in real life, Hosoki propagated that it was women's duty to serve men). Yet, despite this opening stance, the narrative anchors all of Hosoki's struggles to her romantic entanglements. While romantic conflict can be a valid vehicle for character exploration, the relationships in this drama lack emotional resonance onscreen. Because Hosoki is written as a mere image rather than a fleshed-out human being, the emotional weight that these conflicts carry are as light as a feather.
As for the acting, Erika Toda herself delivers a great performance, but she is visibly constrained by the material. I don't think Erika herself knew just who she was portraying or wanted to portray. The direction and script leave her characterization fragmented; rather than portraying a cohesive, evolving individual, Erika is left navigating a series of disjointed emotional states dictated by the plot's immediate needs.
Historical context? Despite the immense potential of the post-war setting, the historical backdrop functions as mere window dressing. Aside from well-crafted period sets and sporadic news snippets, the socio-political climate has zero impact on the actual story.
I only stuck around until the end because a non-MDL reviewer said that the last few episodes were juicy enough. But I was ultimately left sorely disappointed there as well.
The show tried to do too much, and decided to solve their problem by heavily relying on us having prior knowledge of the public figure. Instead of, oh I don't know, focusing on active storytelling. The script spends barely minutes on the titular character’s actual formative years, immediately thrusting us into Hosoki Kazuko's adulthood when her persona is already fully established. From there, the plot settles into a repetitive, superficial cycle:
A business is established -> The audience is abruptly told the venture was a success in the next scene -> A hardship occurs that barely lasts and has our Hosoki still looking as impeccable as ever, then is followed immediately by another pivot to a new enterprise -> Rinse and repeat
Because we are not permitted to witness the labor behind her success or properly see the emotional fallout of her failures, Hosoki's supposed moral descent carries no dramatic weight. Not that there even IS a semblance of a moral descent to explore in the first place. By the time the drama reaches its crude conclusion, we are once again simply told that she is the villain, rather than being allowed to witness her evolution into one. Heck, we don't even get into fortune telling, her actual big business, until the last couple of episodes. And even then, it is just breezed through like it is a mere footnote.
Speaking of, the show starts off with Hosoki fiercely criticizing a woman for relying on men, advocating instead for female independence (ironically, in real life, Hosoki propagated that it was women's duty to serve men). Yet, despite this opening stance, the narrative anchors all of Hosoki's struggles to her romantic entanglements. While romantic conflict can be a valid vehicle for character exploration, the relationships in this drama lack emotional resonance onscreen. Because Hosoki is written as a mere image rather than a fleshed-out human being, the emotional weight that these conflicts carry are as light as a feather.
As for the acting, Erika Toda herself delivers a great performance, but she is visibly constrained by the material. I don't think Erika herself knew just who she was portraying or wanted to portray. The direction and script leave her characterization fragmented; rather than portraying a cohesive, evolving individual, Erika is left navigating a series of disjointed emotional states dictated by the plot's immediate needs.
Historical context? Despite the immense potential of the post-war setting, the historical backdrop functions as mere window dressing. Aside from well-crafted period sets and sporadic news snippets, the socio-political climate has zero impact on the actual story.
I only stuck around until the end because a non-MDL reviewer said that the last few episodes were juicy enough. But I was ultimately left sorely disappointed there as well.
Was this review helpful to you?
