Paunitka

I guess you summarised the situation quite accurately. Shane is a good boy, but his understanding of what might hurt other people is rather limited. To me, this is realistic, especially that we know that he had some behavioural problems as kid.

In the copy I watched, this book title is translated as "Theory of Gender" - I guess that makes more sense.

There are many movies about simple characters, who are either 100% straight or 100% gay all the time, and that's that. Shane's feelings are more complicated , which is the most interesting part of the movie. Why did he have sex with Jonathan? It is for the viewers to try to answer. Gives you food for thought. As for the girl - she loves them both, so no easy answer here either. I don't see, what she did wrong.

It looked like they were preparing a ground for revealing that he raped someone, or at least embezzled all the club funds. [facepalm] This show deserves all the rant it got from you. :D

IKR? Maybe this is because they had this one-child policy? Having children became a taboo? Or maybe taking care of a child would be OK for a woman, but Solo was a man and should be more "macho"? We would probably need a culturally-consious Chinese to explain that.

I am really curious if this is some sort of a cultural difference? Is it typical in China to see childcare as demeaning? :-/ Because stalking is definitely seen as a "nice way of showing love" there - it gets depicted as such in too many shows! [facepalm]

@foxyjo The team is shown as good friends at first. Then Solo has a difficult situation - he has to take care of a child he did not even know he had. As the saying goes, friend in need is friend indeed. The fact that ML did not support Solo in this situation shows that he was not a dependable friend. The fact that ML bore grudge against Solo in this situation - where Solo was just acting decently - is beyond my comprehension. It is Solo who could be angry with ML, not the other way round.

I might actually watch that one. DT is such a lovable character! He shows that you can be smart and successful, but modest and amicable at the same time.

"In what world does a grown man guilt someone else over taking care of their child??" - wow, so not only I have noticed that? This aspect of the plot was so absurd...

Indeed, from the technical perspective, there are numerous plot-holes, e.g. when he noticed that the phone was missing, he would probably remotely block it and wipe its content - I mean, I know, it's possible, so a prodigy would know too. Still, if you are not really interested in mobile technology or IT, you probably wouldn't care (I didn't, ignorance is bliss). As for his stupid behaviour - he clearly has a social phobia, so it's stress that does not let him think and act rationally. He is a totally different person over the phone and confronted face-to-face . Also with that girl's phone the mistake resulted from stress - to me that was clear.