Editorials Details
- Last Online: 19 days ago
- Location: In Moran's chamber
- Contribution Points: 9 LV1
- Roles: VIP
- Join Date: December 4, 2021
- Awards Received:
7
34
2
1
4
1
1
1
2
1
Editorials
K-Drama
Editorials
7
34
2
1
4
1
1
1
2
1
Your point about the inner monologue is such a good one too. Japanese dramas usually aren’t shy about letting us sit inside a character’s head, so skipping Sugiki’s thoughts at that exact moment felt like a strange restraint 😭
The sequel bait was definitely intentional and I hope it actually leads somewhere. If they do continue, I think it could really elevate the whole story in retrospect. Fingers crossed 🥰
I don’t think ratings should be about honoring intention. That’s what analysis, essays and film school discussions are for. A rating, at least for me is a gut-level summary of the experience I actually had while watching. How engaged was I? How often was I bored? Did I feel something? And this isn’t about me throwing a tantrum because I “didn’t get enough romance.” That framing kind of flattens the critique. A slow burn only works if the burn is doing something to you. Here, I understood the emotional restraint, I saw the tease but it didn’t land emotionally for me. Frustration can be an artistic tool, yes, but it’s also a risk. Sometimes frustration is productive. Sometimes it just disconnects the viewer. For me, it was the latter.
I did appreciate the art. That’s why I spent so much time praising the performances. But appreciation and enjoyment aren’t the same thing. I can admire a painting and still not want it hanging on my wall. My rating reflects whether I wanted to stay in that experience and honestly, I didn’t.
Also, I don’t think “rate it for what the creator intended” is a neutral standard. You’re saying people should rate a film based on the writer/director’s intention rather than on what they personally wanted out of it… but then you literally docked points because Machida’s facial expressions annoyed you. That has nothing to do with intention and everything to do with personal response which is exactly what you’re criticizing me for.
If we’re being consistent, someone could just as easily say, “Well, maybe those expressions were intentional, meant to convey intensity and you should appreciate them as part of the artistic vision.” But you didn’t because they pulled you out of the experience. And that’s valid.
What I actually rate is my enjoyment. Full stop. And my enjoyment here was low.
Yes, it was beautiful. Yes, the actors were great. Yes, the dance was technically impressive. None of that changes the fact that I was bored for at least 50% of the runtime. And for me, boredom is a way bigger problem than an unfinished ending. If I’m checking out mentally halfway through a movie, that’s not a small issue for me. Also, my disappointment isn’t about the manga being unfinished. I’m fully aware this is an adaptation of an ongoing work. An open or abrupt ending isn’t automatically bad and I never said it was. But “signaling the start of something new” doesn’t magically make the journey up to that point more engaging. A movie still has to stand on its own within its runtime, unfinished source material or not. Calling my expectations “childish” feels lazy tbh. Expectations are personal. I went in expecting more emotional momentum and a stronger romantic payoff so I can intellectually appreciate what the movie was doing and still feel emotionally underwhelmed by it. Those two things aren’t contradictory.
If anything, I think it’s more honest to dock 1.5 stars or even more while still clearly articulating what the film does well, than to inflate a score just because it’s “objectively” good or faithful to its source. So yeah, I stand by my rating. Not because the movie is bad, it isn’t but because it didn’t move me, didn’t grip me and didn’t keep me engaged. And for my system, that matters more than polish ever will.