Mimicat

Bible said it will depend on everyone's perspective if this ends happy or sad but then he also mentioned that the only way you won't cry at this show is if you are heartless 🤡

They shouldn't generalize anyone like that. It's a bit odd to assume why people are watching; most of us genuinely love the show and find it interesting. It's fine if they don't, but they have no right to make assumptions about our reasons for enjoying it just because they don't resonate with the content.

The issue is that this person wasn't just sharing their own viewpoint; they also claimed that anyone who watches this show is only interested in gay sex, which is insulting. Also, they made a comment about incest among the actors because they look similar. It's fine to share an opinion about the show, but not with these kinds of attacks.

To be honest, I was really struggling to keep my response polite 😭. Their comment almost made me angry. I personally don't care about their rating, but they acted like everyone who watches 4 minutes is just a fetishizer looking for porn. Do they even think before speaking??

Haha yes Vegas and Pete were the secondary couple in Kinnporsche but if you were triggered by the assault I don't recommend looking into vegaspete, there was kidnapping, torture involved between them.

He did, zoom in the picture there is a pink bottle of lube in his hand that he closes after 😅

https://www.tumblr.com/biblelover78/758009241221103616?source=share

He did use lube, he opened the bottle and then closed it after using it

I appreciate constructive criticism, and I can understand your viewpoint about the series potentially being confusing or lacking in plot. However, when your critique veers into personal attacks or misconceptions, like implying incest based on superficial similarities, it detracts from a thoughtful discussion.

Let’s address your comments: One, your criticism about the age of the characters seems misplaced. There’s only a small age difference between them, and it’s not unusual for surgeon's to be of varying ages. The age gap does not substantiate the claims you’re making. Two, the perception of chemistry between characters is subjective. Some viewers might see a strong connection, while others do not. Both viewpoints are valid. Three, Incest specifically refers to relationships between blood relatives. Any resemblance between characters does not constitute incest, regardless of how similar they might appear to you. Finally, accusing fans for their enjoyment of the series is unnecessary. People have different tastes and interests, and there's no need to belittle others for enjoying something you do not.

I can somewhat understand this reaction with young, inexperienced adults, but I've also seen many older people label almost every BL show with a naked guy as "porn." That’s where I get confused or start to think they’re just looking for a reason to hate the show without a better argument.

Tonkla said "thank you" because, after Korn reached his orgasm, he gave Tonkla a hand job so that he could finish as well.

No, he used a condom. Although he didn’t verbally refuse, you can see the disappointment on Tonkla’s face when Korn tears open the condom. I guess Korn didn’t want to do that because he’s also involved sexually with other people.

I haven’t watched "Wandee" because it wasn’t really my thing, but I’ve seen enough edits to know there was a decent plot involved, and the sex scenes weren’t that graphic. So, I’m puzzled by the criticism. I’m not really bothered by it; I just wish I knew if people genuinely think that way or if they’re using it as an excuse to hate the show.

I’d love to understand what’s going through their minds when they write that.

It doesn’t really bother me, but I’m curious about what makes people think that way. I don’t understand it and even in the reviews, some people keep mentioning it. There are definitely many aspects of this show that can be criticized, and I'm sure it has its flaws in the eyes of some viewers. But I’m curious: how do people come to the conclusion that it’s porn lmao.

I don't get how this is considered "porn with no plot." There's one sex scene in the first episode that lasts less than five minutes, and a brief one in the second episode that's under a minute. What about the other 50 minutes of plot development? Calling this "porn" is like calling a spy thriller a rom-com because there's a kiss scene.

It's time for BOC to take notes

Thank you for clarifying. Initially, I thought you were referring to sexual submission, but I know that submission can manifest in various contexts, not just during sex. Great's character still puzzles me. He often appears assertive around others, yet when he's with Tyme, he becomes noticeably shy and overall submissive, as you described.

I think that in the original timeline, they met under circumstances that likely led Tyme to see Great in a negative light as you described him "morally corrupt" because without the changes he makes by reverting the 4 minutes, he does seem like a pretty horrible person. Now, maybe Great is trying to rewrite the past, creating a new scenario for their meeting. By doing this, he highlights his positive traits, ensuring that Tyme recognizes the good in him.

If their future interactions involve these little details I am sure ill die by the end of this show lmao, I saw in the trailer Tyme plays with Great's hair while he eats and I GIGGLED

ME TOO if I have to wait an other week for it I might just go crazy