they reaally went all in on the NC scenes oh my gawrddd!!... but the episode's ending?? like y'all can't be dih hoppin' one minute and then the next is suddenly a scary cliff hanger ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜
i desagree. Why do you hink you have to decide for other people and judge them? As far the series shows, there…
a 14 year old consenting to another 14 year old is not pedophilia, but if a 14 yo was with an 8 yo then that would be pedophilia, it's about the power dynamic.
age of consent doesn't define whether or not it's okay to be with a child, because it's not. and I think that countries where the age of consent is below 18 are sick, of course it can change depending on the situation and can sometimes be 16, in my country it varies between 16 and 18.
but the thing is, even though an 8 year old is not as developed as a 14 year old, it doesn't make it any better to groom that 14 year old just because they're older. that's still a child? it doesn't make them old enough to consent just because they are slightly more developed. because grooming an 8 year old is JUST AS BAD as grooming a 14 year old, even if one is more developed. you're saying that it's better to groom a teen because they're more developed? no it is not any better. no child should be groomed. and that 14 year old is a child. teens are just as vulnerable as any other children. it's always equally as bad. every child will be traumatised, it really doesn't matter what age they are. because by obsessing over the definition you're telling me that you think it's better to groom teens. when in reality it's still just as bad as grooming a younger child. I don't think it's trivialising the term at all. because keeping every child predator under that one term, is telling them that it doesn't matter if the child is 10 or 15, it's still a child. to me it's more trivialising the grooming against teens and how it's seen as less severe.
there shouldn't be different terms for liking children. that just excuses child predators. because then it'll be seen as less severe to groom a teen.
They're 3 or 4 years apart in age.Akira is a minor, not a child.Grow up.
all you know is gooning and grooming ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ you're also self-contradicting yourself in your sentences lmaoo, I'm "sex-phobic" but also a "panty-sniffer" and "trying to take us back to the 1950s"? mate I watch gay dramas and defend children from child predators? and again it's not about when an 18 year old turns into a full grown adult, it's about the power dynamic. a 14 year old child is severely more underdeveloped than an 18 or 19 year old. the adult has more power over a child, hence why it is not okay. a child cannot consent because they are not as developed as an 18+ year old. teens have rights over their own sexual choices but it's not the same as them being groomed by an adult. the "gray area" exists within the people who are in the same age range, for example 17 and 18. a 14 year old is not in that age range.
People posting comments on this series love to toss the words Pedophile or pedo (which is actually a prefix which…
by this definiton you're telling child predators that it's not as bad to groom teens as it is to groom younger children. they're all children, and why does there need to be different terms for liking children? I think that it's weird to obsess over a term and it's definition when overall liking children is bad, it doesn't matter what age they are IT'S STILL A CHILD. grooming is still as life altering and traumatising for every child, it doesn't make it better just because their age ends with "-teen". all of them are children and all of it is just as bad. it should all be treated as pedophilia, it doesn't matter what age the child is, it will be just as severe as any other age.
i desagree. Why do you hink you have to decide for other people and judge them? As far the series shows, there…
I'm sorry but by this you're saying that r/pe against a 14 year old is not as severe as r/ping another child, but the child is just younger? I am tired of people telling others that the term "pedophilia" can only be used on younger children, as if it is not just as bad to like teens, who are still children at the end of the day. it can make actual child predators think that it's not as bad to groom a teen than a young child, when in reality both of them are as bad. it's still as life altering and traumatising, no matter what age it occurs, they're all children. why does there need to be different terms for liking children? because to me it feels like you're saying "it's only bad to like young children but not older children", even though they're all children. I think that it's weird to obsess over a term and it's definition, when it's children they're attracted to.
They're 3 or 4 years apart in age.Akira is a minor, not a child.Grow up.
I'm atheist and I really don't know what religion has to do with this? lmao ok. kind of ironic to tell me that I keep repeating all of the same things since you are aswell?? calling everyone church girls??????? what kind of reasoning or comeback is that?
maybe because the other people are right, and that's why the same things need to be repeated to you, since you are in the wrong here.
a child and an adult should not be in a sexual relationship, an adult has more power over a child. and a child cannot consent to an adult, since the child is not as developed as the adult is. the adult has more power over a child and they can manipulate the child and make them think that it's normal and okay, when it's not. it doesn't matter if the adult doesn't have a fully developed brain yet, it's about the child not being nowhere near the maturity and age, and the child is severely more underdeveloped.
what the fuck is wrong with you. seriously 😠"embrace the freak inside you"?? Ok, so not everyone is a fucking groomer? but you clearly are a groomer and a sick individual.
They're 3 or 4 years apart in age.Akira is a minor, not a child.Grow up.
no they don't, but that's also not how it works. it doesn't matter if they're not a "mature adult" to groom a child. it is very much gross and weird to groom a child and take advantage of them when you yourself are an adult AND SHOULD KNOW BETTER even if your brain hasn't fully developed yet, you are still older and more mature. AND YOU CAN ALSO GROOM A CHILD WHILE BEING A CHILD YOURSELF. it's about the dynamic and how one is clearly more powerful in a relationship. and kanda CLEARLY has more power over him, because HE IS A CHILD. it's not like a child suddenly turns mature because their age ends with "-teen".
their relationship IS NOT NORMAL and SHOULD NEVER BE NORMALISED.
They're 3 or 4 years apart in age.Akira is a minor, not a child.Grow up.
when they met akira was in junior high 12-14 years old, currently he is in high school (11th grade? since akira's brother says he's going to be a senior) which makes him around 17 years old and his brother is in graduate school which makes him 22 years old or older and if we assume kanda is the same age, their age gap can be 5 years or more. if we assume that akira was a 14 year old CHILD when they met and kanda was 19, pretty sure it's illegal for them to have sexual relations. he was grooming him, akira was and is still a child. even if it was 4 years, that's still a huge age and maturity gap. anyone under 18 in japan is a child. it is not normal, stop telling me to grow up.
I am so fed up with the freaking groomer... GET HIM OUT OF HERE ALREADY... I don't wanna see that guy anymore, their relationship was NOT NORMAL AND AKIRA WAS BEING GROOMED!!!!! why are they normalising their relationship when it's literally an adult grooming a child, I hate that in this series.
I really liked the gl couple and fortpeat was alright in this series, I just sometimes couldn't get behind the series' logic 😠and as someone who has done sh it was a little scary but I guess pretty accurate.
1 
age of consent doesn't define whether or not it's okay to be with a child, because it's not. and I think that countries where the age of consent is below 18 are sick, of course it can change depending on the situation and can sometimes be 16, in my country it varies between 16 and 18.
but the thing is, even though an 8 year old is not as developed as a 14 year old, it doesn't make it any better to groom that 14 year old just because they're older. that's still a child? it doesn't make them old enough to consent just because they are slightly more developed.
because grooming an 8 year old is JUST AS BAD as grooming a 14 year old, even if one is more developed. you're saying that it's better to groom a teen because they're more developed? no it is not any better. no child should be groomed. and that 14 year old is a child. teens are just as vulnerable as any other children. it's always equally as bad. every child will be traumatised, it really doesn't matter what age they are.
because by obsessing over the definition you're telling me that you think it's better to groom teens.
when in reality it's still just as bad as grooming a younger child.
I don't think it's trivialising the term at all.
because keeping every child predator under that one term, is telling them that it doesn't matter if the child is 10 or 15, it's still a child.
to me it's more trivialising the grooming against teens and how it's seen as less severe.
there shouldn't be different terms for liking children.
that just excuses child predators. because then it'll be seen as less severe to groom a teen.
you're also self-contradicting yourself in your sentences lmaoo, I'm "sex-phobic" but also a "panty-sniffer" and "trying to take us back to the 1950s"? mate I watch gay dramas and defend children from child predators?
and again it's not about when an 18 year old turns into a full grown adult, it's about the power dynamic. a 14 year old child is severely more underdeveloped than an 18 or 19 year old. the adult has more power over a child, hence why it is not okay. a child cannot consent because they are not as developed as an 18+ year old. teens have rights over their own sexual choices but it's not the same as them being groomed by an adult. the "gray area" exists within the people who are in the same age range, for example 17 and 18. a 14 year old is not in that age range.
they're all children, and why does there need to be different terms for liking children?
I think that it's weird to obsess over a term and it's definition when overall liking children is bad, it doesn't matter what age they are IT'S STILL A CHILD.
grooming is still as life altering and traumatising for every child, it doesn't make it better just because their age ends with "-teen". all of them are children and all of it is just as bad.
it should all be treated as pedophilia, it doesn't matter what age the child is, it will be just as severe as any other age.
I am tired of people telling others that the term "pedophilia" can only be used on younger children, as if it is not just as bad to like teens, who are still children at the end of the day.
it can make actual child predators think that it's not as bad to groom a teen than a young child, when in reality both of them are as bad. it's still as life altering and traumatising, no matter what age it occurs, they're all children.
why does there need to be different terms for liking children?
because to me it feels like you're saying "it's only bad to like young children but not older children",
even though they're all children.
I think that it's weird to obsess over a term and it's definition, when it's children they're attracted to.
kind of ironic to tell me that I keep repeating all of the same things since you are aswell?? calling everyone church girls??????? what kind of reasoning or comeback is that?
maybe because the other people are right, and that's why the same things need to be repeated to you, since you are in the wrong here.
a child and an adult should not be in a sexual relationship, an adult has more power over a child.
and a child cannot consent to an adult, since the child is not as developed as the adult is. the adult has more power over a child and they can manipulate the child and make them think that it's normal and okay, when it's not.
it doesn't matter if the adult doesn't have a fully developed brain yet, it's about the child not being nowhere near the maturity and age, and the child is severely more underdeveloped.
"embrace the freak inside you"?? Ok, so not everyone is a fucking groomer? but you clearly are a groomer and a sick individual.
it doesn't matter if they're not a "mature adult" to groom a child. it is very much gross and weird to groom a child and take advantage of them when you yourself are an adult AND SHOULD KNOW BETTER even if your brain hasn't fully developed yet, you are still older and more mature.
AND YOU CAN ALSO GROOM A CHILD WHILE BEING A CHILD YOURSELF. it's about the dynamic and how one is clearly more powerful in a relationship.
and kanda CLEARLY has more power over him, because HE IS A CHILD.
it's not like a child suddenly turns mature because their age ends with "-teen".
their relationship IS NOT NORMAL and SHOULD NEVER BE NORMALISED.