I liked this season, maybe because I'm a bit biased about milli 😭 been a fan of hers for a long time, so I was excited to see her perform ^^ liked her songs and perfomances a lot, but I am already a fan so I guess that's why. I liked kim haon as well, but I was not expecting the voting gap to be this huge.
No more GLs in BLs, please, they`re just there as props most of the time. I’m so tired of it. If I wanted to…
ok so, you're just homophobic and it seems like you fetishise gay men! 😊 women who love women deserve to be represented, like it or not. yuri is here to stay! 😁❤️🥰
they reaally went all in on the NC scenes oh my gawrddd!!... but the episode's ending?? like y'all can't be dih hoppin' one minute and then the next is suddenly a scary cliff hanger 😭😭😭😭
i desagree. Why do you hink you have to decide for other people and judge them? As far the series shows, there…
a 14 year old consenting to another 14 year old is not pedophilia, but if a 14 yo was with an 8 yo then that would be pedophilia, it's about the power dynamic.
age of consent doesn't define whether or not it's okay to be with a child, because it's not. and I think that countries where the age of consent is below 18 are sick, of course it can change depending on the situation and can sometimes be 16, in my country it varies between 16 and 18.
but the thing is, even though an 8 year old is not as developed as a 14 year old, it doesn't make it any better to groom that 14 year old just because they're older. that's still a child? it doesn't make them old enough to consent just because they are slightly more developed. because grooming an 8 year old is JUST AS BAD as grooming a 14 year old, even if one is more developed. you're saying that it's better to groom a teen because they're more developed? no it is not any better. no child should be groomed. and that 14 year old is a child. teens are just as vulnerable as any other children. it's always equally as bad. every child will be traumatised, it really doesn't matter what age they are. because by obsessing over the definition you're telling me that you think it's better to groom teens. when in reality it's still just as bad as grooming a younger child. I don't think it's trivialising the term at all. because keeping every child predator under that one term, is telling them that it doesn't matter if the child is 10 or 15, it's still a child. to me it's more trivialising the grooming against teens and how it's seen as less severe.
there shouldn't be different terms for liking children. that just excuses child predators. because then it'll be seen as less severe to groom a teen.
They're 3 or 4 years apart in age.Akira is a minor, not a child.Grow up.
all you know is gooning and grooming 😭😭😭😭 you're also self-contradicting yourself in your sentences lmaoo, I'm "sex-phobic" but also a "panty-sniffer" and "trying to take us back to the 1950s"? mate I watch gay dramas and defend children from child predators? and again it's not about when an 18 year old turns into a full grown adult, it's about the power dynamic. a 14 year old child is severely more underdeveloped than an 18 or 19 year old. the adult has more power over a child, hence why it is not okay. a child cannot consent because they are not as developed as an 18+ year old. teens have rights over their own sexual choices but it's not the same as them being groomed by an adult. the "gray area" exists within the people who are in the same age range, for example 17 and 18. a 14 year old is not in that age range.
1 
buddy, he just told you that he killed someone.
I liked kim haon as well, but I was not expecting the voting gap to be this huge.
age of consent doesn't define whether or not it's okay to be with a child, because it's not. and I think that countries where the age of consent is below 18 are sick, of course it can change depending on the situation and can sometimes be 16, in my country it varies between 16 and 18.
but the thing is, even though an 8 year old is not as developed as a 14 year old, it doesn't make it any better to groom that 14 year old just because they're older. that's still a child? it doesn't make them old enough to consent just because they are slightly more developed.
because grooming an 8 year old is JUST AS BAD as grooming a 14 year old, even if one is more developed. you're saying that it's better to groom a teen because they're more developed? no it is not any better. no child should be groomed. and that 14 year old is a child. teens are just as vulnerable as any other children. it's always equally as bad. every child will be traumatised, it really doesn't matter what age they are.
because by obsessing over the definition you're telling me that you think it's better to groom teens.
when in reality it's still just as bad as grooming a younger child.
I don't think it's trivialising the term at all.
because keeping every child predator under that one term, is telling them that it doesn't matter if the child is 10 or 15, it's still a child.
to me it's more trivialising the grooming against teens and how it's seen as less severe.
there shouldn't be different terms for liking children.
that just excuses child predators. because then it'll be seen as less severe to groom a teen.
you're also self-contradicting yourself in your sentences lmaoo, I'm "sex-phobic" but also a "panty-sniffer" and "trying to take us back to the 1950s"? mate I watch gay dramas and defend children from child predators?
and again it's not about when an 18 year old turns into a full grown adult, it's about the power dynamic. a 14 year old child is severely more underdeveloped than an 18 or 19 year old. the adult has more power over a child, hence why it is not okay. a child cannot consent because they are not as developed as an 18+ year old. teens have rights over their own sexual choices but it's not the same as them being groomed by an adult. the "gray area" exists within the people who are in the same age range, for example 17 and 18. a 14 year old is not in that age range.