People posting comments on this series love to toss the words Pedophile or pedo (which is actually a prefix which…
by this definiton you're telling child predators that it's not as bad to groom teens as it is to groom younger children. they're all children, and why does there need to be different terms for liking children? I think that it's weird to obsess over a term and it's definition when overall liking children is bad, it doesn't matter what age they are IT'S STILL A CHILD. grooming is still as life altering and traumatising for every child, it doesn't make it better just because their age ends with "-teen". all of them are children and all of it is just as bad. it should all be treated as pedophilia, it doesn't matter what age the child is, it will be just as severe as any other age.
i desagree. Why do you hink you have to decide for other people and judge them? As far the series shows, there…
I'm sorry but by this you're saying that r/pe against a 14 year old is not as severe as r/ping another child, but the child is just younger? I am tired of people telling others that the term "pedophilia" can only be used on younger children, as if it is not just as bad to like teens, who are still children at the end of the day. it can make actual child predators think that it's not as bad to groom a teen than a young child, when in reality both of them are as bad. it's still as life altering and traumatising, no matter what age it occurs, they're all children. why does there need to be different terms for liking children? because to me it feels like you're saying "it's only bad to like young children but not older children", even though they're all children. I think that it's weird to obsess over a term and it's definition, when it's children they're attracted to.
They're 3 or 4 years apart in age.Akira is a minor, not a child.Grow up.
I'm atheist and I really don't know what religion has to do with this? lmao ok. kind of ironic to tell me that I keep repeating all of the same things since you are aswell?? calling everyone church girls??????? what kind of reasoning or comeback is that?
maybe because the other people are right, and that's why the same things need to be repeated to you, since you are in the wrong here.
a child and an adult should not be in a sexual relationship, an adult has more power over a child. and a child cannot consent to an adult, since the child is not as developed as the adult is. the adult has more power over a child and they can manipulate the child and make them think that it's normal and okay, when it's not. it doesn't matter if the adult doesn't have a fully developed brain yet, it's about the child not being nowhere near the maturity and age, and the child is severely more underdeveloped.
what the fuck is wrong with you. seriously π "embrace the freak inside you"?? Ok, so not everyone is a fucking groomer? but you clearly are a groomer and a sick individual.
They're 3 or 4 years apart in age.Akira is a minor, not a child.Grow up.
no they don't, but that's also not how it works. it doesn't matter if they're not a "mature adult" to groom a child. it is very much gross and weird to groom a child and take advantage of them when you yourself are an adult AND SHOULD KNOW BETTER even if your brain hasn't fully developed yet, you are still older and more mature. AND YOU CAN ALSO GROOM A CHILD WHILE BEING A CHILD YOURSELF. it's about the dynamic and how one is clearly more powerful in a relationship. and kanda CLEARLY has more power over him, because HE IS A CHILD. it's not like a child suddenly turns mature because their age ends with "-teen".
their relationship IS NOT NORMAL and SHOULD NEVER BE NORMALISED.
They're 3 or 4 years apart in age.Akira is a minor, not a child.Grow up.
when they met akira was in junior high 12-14 years old, currently he is in high school (11th grade? since akira's brother says he's going to be a senior) which makes him around 17 years old and his brother is in graduate school which makes him 22 years old or older and if we assume kanda is the same age, their age gap can be 5 years or more. if we assume that akira was a 14 year old CHILD when they met and kanda was 19, pretty sure it's illegal for them to have sexual relations. he was grooming him, akira was and is still a child. even if it was 4 years, that's still a huge age and maturity gap. anyone under 18 in japan is a child. it is not normal, stop telling me to grow up.
I am so fed up with the freaking groomer... GET HIM OUT OF HERE ALREADY... I don't wanna see that guy anymore, their relationship was NOT NORMAL AND AKIRA WAS BEING GROOMED!!!!! why are they normalising their relationship when it's literally an adult grooming a child, I hate that in this series.
I really liked the gl couple and fortpeat was alright in this series, I just sometimes couldn't get behind the series' logic π and as someone who has done sh it was a little scary but I guess pretty accurate.
I'm kinda surprised that they actually hired a japanese actor π because from what I've seen most of the time they just pick a thai actor, who looks super thai and not east asian at all lol. I really liked this story though! π₯°π«Ά
everyone is a little too crazy in this series, it makes me so so uncomfy when kelvin is literally raping him and kinda wish they toned that down. I like toxic yaoi but this seems too toxic... I love the wlw pair though! π₯°
I love these mini series so much, this one has also made me love SurfJava more!! This story is so silly and cute, plus the chemistry is literally perfect. π«Άπ
I think that the story is interesting but the bl is kind of random? They have time to flirt at work while there are people getting murdered? π I love JoongDunk but their characters in this series aren't that amazing. And also agree that directing and editing is not the greatest.
they're all children, and why does there need to be different terms for liking children?
I think that it's weird to obsess over a term and it's definition when overall liking children is bad, it doesn't matter what age they are IT'S STILL A CHILD.
grooming is still as life altering and traumatising for every child, it doesn't make it better just because their age ends with "-teen". all of them are children and all of it is just as bad.
it should all be treated as pedophilia, it doesn't matter what age the child is, it will be just as severe as any other age.
I am tired of people telling others that the term "pedophilia" can only be used on younger children, as if it is not just as bad to like teens, who are still children at the end of the day.
it can make actual child predators think that it's not as bad to groom a teen than a young child, when in reality both of them are as bad. it's still as life altering and traumatising, no matter what age it occurs, they're all children.
why does there need to be different terms for liking children?
because to me it feels like you're saying "it's only bad to like young children but not older children",
even though they're all children.
I think that it's weird to obsess over a term and it's definition, when it's children they're attracted to.
kind of ironic to tell me that I keep repeating all of the same things since you are aswell?? calling everyone church girls??????? what kind of reasoning or comeback is that?
maybe because the other people are right, and that's why the same things need to be repeated to you, since you are in the wrong here.
a child and an adult should not be in a sexual relationship, an adult has more power over a child.
and a child cannot consent to an adult, since the child is not as developed as the adult is. the adult has more power over a child and they can manipulate the child and make them think that it's normal and okay, when it's not.
it doesn't matter if the adult doesn't have a fully developed brain yet, it's about the child not being nowhere near the maturity and age, and the child is severely more underdeveloped.
"embrace the freak inside you"?? Ok, so not everyone is a fucking groomer? but you clearly are a groomer and a sick individual.
it doesn't matter if they're not a "mature adult" to groom a child. it is very much gross and weird to groom a child and take advantage of them when you yourself are an adult AND SHOULD KNOW BETTER even if your brain hasn't fully developed yet, you are still older and more mature.
AND YOU CAN ALSO GROOM A CHILD WHILE BEING A CHILD YOURSELF. it's about the dynamic and how one is clearly more powerful in a relationship.
and kanda CLEARLY has more power over him, because HE IS A CHILD.
it's not like a child suddenly turns mature because their age ends with "-teen".
their relationship IS NOT NORMAL and SHOULD NEVER BE NORMALISED.