It was mentioned right in the beginning that the doctor said it is not DID but something close to it bcoz it looks…
I highly disagree because even looking past the type of diagnosis, they are still manipulating a woman with a known mental illness. Listen, if you like it, you like it, I'm not here to stop you, but I AM here to emphasize they are romanticizing and trivializing DID, and that's just a fact. Not to mention how they keep calling alters "personalities" when DID isn't a personality disorder.
It was mentioned right in the beginning that the doctor said it is not DID but something close to it bcoz it looks…
Wanting to merge the "personalities" is already romanticizing and trivializing it. I also already said they treat it seriously sometimes in an earlier comment.
The director confirmed she doesn't haven't DID. I really do wonder what happened to the girl's mother. It would…
Yet they constantly refer to it as DID and even if it's supposed to be a fictional diagnosis, it still trivializes and romanticizes DID. Even looking past the type of diagnosis, they are still manipulating a woman with a known mental illness. That's not something that should be romanticized either. I don't know why they thought this was a good idea.
I am SAT. I absolutely love it when they do something different with dynamics, especially when it comes to these fixed pairings. This, IMO, is an excellent representation of how positions are just a preference in a relationship, and has nothing to do with any external factors, while also letting us as viewers experience a NatMax dynamic we haven't seen before, and I am so here for it!
What is very interesting to me about Gaga subs, is that you get the most inconsistencies early on (especially…
Oh, definitely! That kind of mistake is very indicative of machine translation, but the funniest part is that it's not even that consistent. It's like there are several translators working on different parts of the same episodes and some are more reliant on machine translation than others. I notice this with some iQIYI subs as well.
In case anyone's wondering, the translation is not good (as often with Gaga). At this point, I wouldn't be surprised…
What is very interesting to me about Gaga subs, is that you get the most inconsistencies early on (especially in regards to names) and then it may/may not improve further down the line, which makes me believe that the subs are most likely not only created from a transcript alone, but likely also from a Mandarin transcript while also probably being (at least partially) machine translated.
Same! I've seen a few BLs where they're implied to be verse, but I have rarely seen it explicitly stated/shown, and it's even rarer within the same couple.
Yeah some people don't understand that the terms "Top" and "bottom" only apply within people's intercourse and…
Positions in the bedroom literally just comes down to preferences at the end of the day, and some don't even have them. It has nothing to do with their "vibes", their "energy" or their size, and that's what some of these people can't seem to understand. Not to mention how I often see people conflate top/bottom with dom/sub when they don't even mean the same thing.
It was mentioned right in the beginning that the doctor said it is not DID but something close to it bcoz it looks…
Yes, they did say that—then proceeded to call it DID and represent DID in an awful way. At the end of the day it is still trivializing and romanticizing DID, whether it's a fictional diagnosis different from DID or not.
People in the comments are learning that kinks are uncomfortable when you don't have said kink. Well, duh.
Also, I understand having preferences for dynamics, but the way some of you guys talk about these characters and their dynamics, is just not it. News flash, bottoms can be dominant, and I also do not know what the hell "top energy" is supposed to mean. Some people here view BL and gay relationships in general in a specific way, and it shows.
Majority of BL out there follows the same bigger dominant top x smaller submissive bottom dynamics, so go watch those instead if this bothers you so much.
With that said, however, I can kind of understand the alpha thing, because that's a set trope, but also at the end of the day I really do not care and I embrace any time a BL tries to do something new with their dynamics. Sure, the execution may not be the best, but I still find it refreshing all the same.
I was worried it would be like that. I haven't watched it because it seemed offensive, so thank you for the confirmation.…
There are times when they treat it seriously within the series, but for the most part it feels romanticized and/or trivialized. I personally also have an issue with how they're trying to manipulate this woman with a known mental illness because her father wants his daughter back after she witnessed her own mother dead when she was a child. He has this theory that making all 5 "personalities" fall in love with the same person will make them all "fuse back together"...
Not to mention how they keep calling alters "personalities" when DID isn't a personality disorder.
Also, I understand having preferences for dynamics, but the way some of you guys talk about these characters and their dynamics, is just not it. News flash, bottoms can be dominant, and I also do not know what the hell "top energy" is supposed to mean. Some people here view BL and gay relationships in general in a specific way, and it shows.
Majority of BL out there follows the same bigger dominant top x smaller submissive bottom dynamics, so go watch those instead if this bothers you so much.
With that said, however, I can kind of understand the alpha thing, because that's a set trope, but also at the end of the day I really do not care and I embrace any time a BL tries to do something new with their dynamics. Sure, the execution may not be the best, but I still find it refreshing all the same.
Before episode 7, he's only present in two scenes from episode 2, and at most you see the back of his head IIRC.