Details

  • Last Online: Feb 3, 2024
  • Gender: Female
  • Location: Hong Kong
  • Contribution Points: 0 LV0
  • Roles:
  • Join Date: December 28, 2014

Jia M

Hong Kong

Jia M

Hong Kong
Completed
Chungking Express
7 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Apr 6, 2016
Completed 0
Overall 8.0
Story 7.0
Acting/Cast 8.0
Music 8.0
Rewatch Value 7.0
Chungking Express is probably Wong Kar-Wai's ode to romance, longing and 90s Hong Kong. Kar-Wai is known as an auteur for his visual work and Chungking Express is another example why. Instead of working on Ashes of Time, he took some time off and...made another film: Chungking Express.

Written during the day and shot by night is impressive and makes the film an exciting one that adds to Kar-Wai's pool of Asian work. While not his opus, Chungking Express is fascinating on its own. It's a film that's not plot driven but rather pulled and told by jarring cinematography, takeaway-meals and serendipitous tales.

An exotic bright colors and cinematography that's a combination of cris-cross, fast-moving shots that seems like a huge powder of euphoria has been splashed all over the screen. It's not your-typical-romance. It's more about storytelling, dialogue and narrative that's shown through the visuals that allures you.

It's the shakey cameras, the close-ups and the movements that guide you as you want. It's cinematic freedom that speaks pure Kar-Wai style of emotionally resonating narrative, visual uniqueness and stylized touch.

This is a intertwining stories of two cops, both of which are getting over a heartbreak on their own ways yet are told in similar ways through the use of visuals and small references and even candid symbolism that reflect Kar-Wai's poetic storytelling. It's really the second story that shows more of Kar-Wai masterpiece with cinematic sequences, engaging dialogues and great contrast and after effects. It's the little details of slow-motions or Faye's dancing in no. 663's apartment that pulls the cinematographic storytelling forward.

As such Chungking Express just like Kar-Wai's films about love is showing that love-can't really be described. No words. Instead, he shows it through visuals and details and such. This makes the film pure, not romanticized and a alluring ode to Asian cinema.

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?
Completed
All About Lily Chou Chou
7 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Mar 31, 2016
Completed 0
Overall 8.5
Story 7.0
Acting/Cast 9.0
Music 10
Rewatch Value 6.5
Where do I even begin? All About Lily Chou-Chou with its 160 minutes running time has probably been the longest film I have ever watched. Was I exhausted after? No. (But my legs and back were aching as I watching this on my bed on a bright Thursday afternoon...)

With such a long running time, it's difficult to wrap my head around what I feel about this film. It's also my first Shunji Iwai film (and it wouldn't be the last). Iwai, cinematographer, Noboru Shinoda and music director, Takeshi Kobayashi are able to beautifully portray something so brutal through the colors, the shots and the music. That's cruel. You see something so terrible happening in front of you but you're so mesmerized because it's done so beautifully. They romanticized teenage angst so well.

The plot is simple and it doesn't try too hard. The narration is easy to follow despite it not being linear...it makes you more intrigued to watch. But perhaps a problem lies with the plot's simplicity yet carries an almost riddle-like script writing with its overwrought and difficult-to-decipher black screen, white text repetitions. It's poetic but together it's words that don't make sense... generally to just normal watchers. (What is Lily's Ether????) It's trying to be philosophical in a coming-of-age film which in one hand, captures this change but at the same time, leaves you baffled and scratching your hand. There's just a lot of vagueness, a lot of interpretation (You decide the identity of those posting in the board too) of you to do that it creates a miscommunication between director and audience in the expense of telling his characters' stories.

We have an amazing pool of young characters that drive the story forward with Shugo Oshinari whom I think has the most interesting character. It seems like he underwent some kind of ephiphany (though not really in a good way) during a trip to Okinawa and just...changes. Just snaps. Kikeru - sudden fits of rage. It's interesting but at the same time the "why" isn't explored. Or maybe it doesn't matter. Maybe it's not the why but the what.

Hayato Ichihara is your typical wimpy loner that allows himself to be bullied. It's pathetic and not fun to watch. You don't feel bad but Ichihara plays his character like he doesn't want you to pity him...instead he wants you to slap him awake. I think that is engagement with the audience. For a film with such a simple plot and long running time, we need that.

And again, cinematography is just great. The colors are bright and crisp. The setting is in Ashikaga in the Tochigi Prefecture and the film captures the setting (not in the hussle and bustle of busy Tokyo) so well and it just perfectly wraps itself in the context of the film.

Most of the scenes are shot probably using a lightweight camera especially in the Okinawa scenes with shaky shots and hand-held shots. This is to establish a sense of connection with the audience...as if you're watching a home video. It's effective (and profanely beautiful) but it could be too much in a 160 minutes run. The music is superb, sang by fictional-idol Lily Chou-Chou (Salyu in real life) and it reflects the mystic and visual allure of the film.

I think that this film has some underlying social commentary to it. A film that's full of mystic and vague messages. Is it simply to show the extreme lengths of youth violence that is fueled by teenage angst which would cause bewilderment especially in a society such as Japan's? A society that boasts of politeness (highlighted in the film too), of social order, or discipline, of stability and of staying true to its norms and roots? Is there a place for rebellious teenagers? What about worshiping an idol to the point that you believe her songs exists even in the normal realms of reality? Idol-worshiping and virtual reality and to an extent, escapism are big things in Japanese society. Does the internet offer refuge from the horros of the reality especially in that kind of society?

Like one commentator said, "Lily Chou-chou is just human." Or is this film simply to show human life as what it is? Iwai's message is simple but it's up to you to decide what's your take on it.

Finally, if you're expecting a satisfying conclusion after watching so long. Don't. That too, is up to you. This film isn't for everyone. So if you can sit for 160 minutes and watch a romanticized story of teenage angst then this is for you. Or if you want to think about life...this might be for you too. In the end, it's the way the story was told through amazing visuals that got me. It's a powerful, haunting and honest coming-of-age film.

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?
Completed
Himizu
7 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Mar 16, 2016
Completed 0
Overall 8.5
Story 6.0
Acting/Cast 10
Music 8.0
Rewatch Value 6.0
Sion Sono is a helmer in the Japanese industry with 25 projects and TV series done in the past 10 years. Needless to say, this is my first Sono film. Here, he adapts a 2011 manga, Himizu, about a teenager who's thrown into the edge of despair. Sono added the 2011 Tsunami and earthquake to this adaptation.

This film is not for everyone. If you're looking to be entertained, don't expect. It's an emotional roller coaster of a mindfuck, for the lack of a better word. It's a dark coming-of-age story. Not your wishy-washy type. It's just keeps driving down and down and down. (But does have a light at the end of the tunnel.) For a 2-hour feature of violence, madness and despair, it's an exhausting watch. One that drags on and on and on and you just want to put these characters out of their misery. But Sono captures these daily struggles with graphic scenes, staggering images and in-your-throat drama that sometimes seem to hyperbolic for your own taste. But effective in delivering the message.

It's a film about the youth. About brokenness. About a bleak future. Although it depicts a rather negative image of Japan and the burden of the youth to paint a future for the emotionally broken adults even if that future is bleak. This negativity is meant to allow viewers to reflect a broken system. Sono's symbolism, repetitive images, long cuts and foreshadowing makes for a masterful play on this rather dark and tragic tale. The music/soundtrack is playful. It's flirts with the cinematography and blends in so well. The low sounds echo that of the tragic story and the catastrophe left by the March 2011 incident. This is a tragedy. Even the bubbly, laughing Keiko (played by Fumi Nikaido) is also dragged into the hellhole.

Shota Sometani (husband of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress nominee, Rinko Kikuchi who is 10 years his senior) and Fumi Nikaido (both have also worked in other films together before and after this one; hence, the undeniable chemistry between the two) are versatile and experienced actors show why they deserve their Marcello Mastroianni Award. Sometani 's performance as a angst-ridden Sumida is a tour de force. It's difficult to believe he plays a 14-year-old character. It's sickening and pitiful as much as it's admirable to watch him. Despite keeping a stone face, it's acting that's not dead fish. The screaming, the mere falling down, the rolling in dirt, the crying in the rain, it's all delivered with such extreme clarity. Nikaido is amazing as well. But like what I said about her in "My Man", she has this innocence that's scary and I also feel that here. But she adds an edge to her acting, there is more tears and that actually complements Sometani's "zombie" character.

The underlying social commentary about a sickness prevalent in society is the film's most important giveaway.

It's the desire of youth, seen as the hope for the future to do good. Even if they can't do good for themselves, they'll do it for society because that's what we're expected to do right? Adults mess it up and we have to find ways to fix it. Adults run away and we have to solve it even if we ourselves also want to run away. That's what Sumida is truly running away from. That's why he wants to be ordinary. That's why he just wants to be normal.

I know this is not a romance but Sumida's bleakness is complemented by Keiko's optimstic nature even if her love is a masochistic, almost obessessive one, there's still a tinge of light in it as she pushes Sumida forward. A distorted version of a manic-pixie dreamgirl you could say.

But as such, it luads more instead, to be hopeful. As Sumida shouts, "Don't give up!" Have a dream!" Yes, it's portrayed tragically, the entirety of the film is but it also provides you a resolution at the end. Thus, this film being Dylan Storm's favorite (taking a line from it to justify his action) misses the take and point that it wants to deliver.

P.S. The recitation of Villon's "Ballade" of the characters is perfect. Of course, the whole poem isn't recited but it carries a meaning that the film has. It's even said by one of the characters. "I know everything but myself." For a film about loss, future and tragedy, it's difficult to find who you really are at the end of the day. Or if you ever will.

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?
Completed
My Man
7 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Mar 6, 2016
Completed 0
Overall 8.0
Story 7.0
Acting/Cast 10
Music 7.0
Rewatch Value 5.0
Kazuyoshi Kumakiri is well-known for exploring stories and characters at their lowest, at the ruins of disaster, violence, death and examining them at emotional extremes. My Man, based on Kazuki Sakuraba's novel "Watashi no Otoko" truly lives up to an extreme: incest, a truly taboo topic that I think has been explored in Asian cinema much more than its Western counterparts (does that make Asian cinema more daring? Well, that's up for another discussion).

If you think Vladimi Nabokov's "Lolita" was difficult to stomach or Stanley Kubrick's film adaptation was daring enough at the time it was released...well, expect My Man to level that up. With not only touches and kisses but straightforward intimate, sexual scenes between Nikaido and Asano will probably leave you disgusted, angry or just pure disturbed. But that's probably Kumakiri's goal. It's not the dialogue that will make you feel the emotions rather it's the actions with dripping rains of blood that symbolize this forbidden passion.

A lot of watchers compare this with The World of Kanako (which Nikaido also played a part) but I tell you, this is nothing like Kawaki. If Kawaki is fast-paced and overwhelming, My Man is slow-paced, ant-climatic yet its in the actors' performances that pulls you in and pulls the story in. Kumakiri omits a lot of explanation, how the characters feel, what they think, what others think, etc. which gives us, as viewers freedom yet it could also cause confusion especially in a film that explores such a story.

There are some foreshadowing, some repetition and more importantly, contrast. A lot of it. That's what makes each character stand out and it snowballs the plot (a good sentiment as the film is set in Hokkaido, the coldest region in Japan, expect to see lots of snow here). That setting makes you feel colder towards these characters (instead of warm) and it creates that distance to feel sympathize for Nikaido and Asano's relationship even as their characters start to descent into chaos and madness.


Nikaido as Hana is amazing (I mean she's only 1 year and 1 day older me and her boldness with this role). She deserves to be the "It" dramatic actress to watch out for (I heard she is amazing in Himizu as well, which I will watch after this!). She has this ability to portray a bubbly, energetic schoolgirl that LOOKS innocent yet holds deep secrecy (of the forbidden relationship and a traumatic past) and in some way, that makes her scary. And effective as an actress. She is able to portray Hana's deterioration because of this relationship not verbally but emotionally. Later on, she becomes a independent woman yet holds a sense of distant and quiet destruction inside of her but not with such a dull expression rather with the eyes. She carries herself and not let her older co-actors do that.

Asano works well with Nikaido (weird to say that but yes). He doesn't provide Jungo's character with anger or destructive features. Yet he also doesn't soften his character, through his actions we hate him. Through them, we don't feel bad at his dismay yet we can't utterly hate him because Asano doesn't make Jungo hate-able. In some ways, Nikaido's Hana carries his character as he becomes dependent on her yet Nikaido's performance blends in well with his.

This movie is not for everyone, definitely. Yes, it can be disturbing and not an easy watch and definitely twisted. But it's also such films that portray things that happen in society especially those who went through so much (whether it's right or wrong is up for debate and up to you). Though, if you expect a conclusion, don't. It seems that Asian films don't really have a solid one. Instead, focus on the journey of these two.

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?
Completed
Our Little Sister
8 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Jul 22, 2016
Completed 0
Overall 8.0
Story 6.0
Acting/Cast 10
Music 10
Rewatch Value 7.0
Our Little Sister, comparing to Hirokazu Koreeda's other films, doesn't come quite as strong. Instead, Our Little Sister focuses on mere storytelling without an actual goal that it seems to want to achieve. Koreeda gives us a tale of sisters and their life after they adopt their half-sister from their father's extramarital affair. It's still about family but this time, it focuses more on sisterhood. But that's not to say that parenthood isn't as important. After all, it is the parents' decisions that led to what happens to the sisters.

It's subtle but as with Koreeda, it's nothing new: it's about the little details and the little things. I say that Our Little Sister doesn't come as strong because it's less sentimental and it's less melodramatic. The conflict here is not as jarring as say, Nobody Knows or Like Father Like Son. That's one aspect that makes it seem directionless but if you look at it from another way, maybe that's the intention: not to have such a big conflict (the fact that the sister is another woman's is the central conflict) but to just tell a story. And one that's still touching. As someone who doesn't have a sister (I have two brothers and the middle child), I felt the bonds of sisterhood even just a little.

Koreeda trademarks are still present: music pacing (this time, not much piano), long shots showing the beauty of the setting hence, not much close-up and the little details (e.g. the umerashi). Though this time, we don't have young actors (save for Hirose Suzu who is around 17 years old when she filmed this), but the cast including Haruna Ayase, Kaho, Masami Nagasawa (who was also in I Wish) still delivers incredible performances. All three of them were nominated in Japan Academy Award for their performances.

I actually liked the contrast between the four sisters, Ayase plays the eldest, the mother figure, Nagasawa plays the carefree, stylish one, Kaho plays the oddball, happy-go-lucky and Suzu plays the quiet, simple one. It's such a treat to watch all these different personalities go together and interact. There is undeniable chemistry between the four.

Suzu (who won Breakthrough Star in Japan Academy Award), a current rising young star, whose two TV dramas I've seen, can act but sincerity lacks (like her eyes, it's shallow, it doesn't speak the emotions, you get what I mean? Some call her a deadeye actor but she can cry alright) although here because it's less melodramatic, her character fits her well, comparatively speaking. (But with more roles being given to her currently and working with talented actors, perhaps it's bound to change.)

As with Koreeda, lines are so natural and everything flows so well. The cinematography is so beautiful and the beauty of the countryside has been highlighted in the film. It also competed for Palme d'Or at Cannes 2015 (Suzu at Cannes at 17!!)

Our Little Sister isn't bad, I enjoyed it for its simplicity and beautiful visuals. But perhaps its unsentimental approach makes it a lackluster watch compared to other heavy Koreeda's dramas. Indeed, it doesn't have the feels but it has a calming effect as you watch: the setting helps, and the natural acting helps. It won't break your heart but it will touch your heart.

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?
Completed
Strange Circus
8 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Jul 5, 2016
Completed 0
Overall 7.5
Story 5.0
Acting/Cast 8.0
Music 8.0
Rewatch Value 1.0
Described as Sion Sono's "most disturbing" film, one that pushes the boundaries of storytelling itself, any Sono fan would be curious to watch this film. The themes in the film are indeed very very disturbing. Sono, an unorthodox filmmaker himself tried to tell a story that shows people at their extreme, darkest and one of the most insane portrayal of human identity. Though done in a disturbing way, it's still shows the caliber of a bold and daring director.

With themes dealing with incest, molestation, rape, depersonalization, mutation and transexuality, Sono takes you to a dark and disturbing journey. An unforgettable one. I've always seen Sono's works as ambiguous, weird and bizarre. Strange Circus might have just brought that to another level, rivaling even that of Takeshi Miike's standards.

This film deals a lot with the deconstruction of collectivism which really is a trait of Japanese society compared to the more individualistic trait of western society. You destroy one, you destroy the other. You create one, you take the other. The use of a traditional family (father, mother and child) is an example of that. Their home, one that looks more Western also shows that.

And Sono deconstructs family here, ultimately, to find individual identity for the characters. It's not an entertaining film. It's poetic in the most disturbing and weird way. There's a lot of metaphors, a lot of dark and bloody visuals. The white walls symbolizing innocence and purity is tainted with the horrors that unfold. And that last scene. So much symbolism. Anyone would think it's weird. But it actually meant a lot (and a satisfying close too) to the film's overall story.

Ultimately, the very ambiguous ending and non-linear storytelling tests the audience. Presenting you a disturbing way to tell a story, it asks if you indeed, as a viewer, were paying attention. Can you tell what's real or not? Sono takes you in, tries to make you think you understand it, only to stab you in the back with a plot twist that makes you question your own judgement. That part reminded me so much of Satoshi Kon's Perfect Blue. That psychological mindfuck.

Perhaps, the only problem that I have is the ambiguity of the story seems like it's going no where. The story itself doesn't have a goal, at least it wasn't established until the last 40-30 minutes of the film. You, the audience have a goal which is to figure out what the heck is happening. And if you don't know what's happening because of the huge ambiguity, that's a problem too.

Was I disturbed? You bet I was. But it's not because of the blood and gore. I was much more disturbed watching Miike's Audition. But the themes here are ones that will put a lot of people off. The rather surprising (and at the same time) cliche plot twist as well. It's a film that's a lot to take in, it's not enjoyable. But the masterful storytelling is one to applaud this film for.

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?
Completed
Picnic
6 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Jul 22, 2016
Completed 0
Overall 8.5
Story 8.0
Acting/Cast 10
Music 9.0
Rewatch Value 7.5
Such a nice decision for Shunji Iwai to use walls as a symbol/metaphor than what it's normally being used for. Instead of walls being something that keeps these three main characters out, it becomes a way for them to see the world and experience freedom outside of the mental asylum.

Iwai's portrayal of mental illness is not wishy-washy nor is it romanticized. Instead, he gives us something real. These characters speak with the desire to be understood. Often, their words carry more than one meaning -- one that many misunderstand. When Satoru says, "Save me" while being strangled by blankets left to dry, he meant 1) literally save me 2) save me from this world and from myself. These little details are so nice and appreciated.

Picnic is a simple tale. With just an hour running time, Iwai embraces the cinematography with such beautiful visuals and light soundtrack, it tugs at your heartstrings. Despite being confined to wall within the walls, you feel like you are also exploring the world with the three main characters. Their stories are disturbing but that's precisely what makes it feel real. Carrying a picnic basket while watching the end of the world is such a simple act, it makes the "end of the world" feel as if it's just an every day thing.

While the theme of religion play here, I don't think Iwai is preaching. Instead, he gives the message that our life is dictated by us as much as we believe in God or not.

The final scene, black feathers contrast with the pink/yellow sun as it's about to set is so beautiful I will remember it forever.

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?
Completed
Love Exposure
6 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Jun 19, 2016
Completed 0
Overall 9.0
Story 9.0
Acting/Cast 10
Music 7.5
Rewatch Value 7.0
I watched Love Exposure on a 11 hours plane ride to Vancouver (my first ever out of Asia trip) so the thing is 1) I was sleepy 2) I was sleepy 3) I was sleepy. I watched Love Exposure knowing absolutely nothing about it except two things: it's by Sion Sono and it's 4 hours long. But other than that, I don't know anything else. And boy, was I in for a surprise.

4 hours didn't feel like 4 hours at all. In fact, it made my 11 hours flight seem...so short. To summarize what Love Exposure is is difficult. But that's very Sion Sono-like anyway. He's an auter that way. I enjoyed Love Exposure because it was different, because it was refreshing. It's a combination of all these things that normally don't fit well together but Sono does just that -- very Sono-like again. You have religion in one area and then sexuality on the other. You have panty shots on one hand and blood on the other. You have sinning in one hand and confession on the other. They're not things that go hand in hand yet Sono makes a perfect combination out of them.

I don't know what Love Exposure wanted me to get out of it. But it doesn't matter. In fact, I think Sono doesn't even want to make you think too hard. You're not suppose to undergo some epiphany just because of it. It's just a mash-up of different things that keeps you entertained and also think but not to the point of overanalyzing -- much like Sono's other works anyway. Sono doesn't try to hard to insert things, he shows it to you.

The divisions of 4 chapters was cleverly done and balanced well enough. There are loads of characters but each of them are given their own screen time that it doesn't seem so lopsided. It's 4 hours alright, but I felt like everything mattered and needed to be there...no matter how bizarre and weird they seem.

Truly, it's a romantic comedy that isn't subtly one. Above all, I think it aims to reflect the whole parent vs. child conflict of how parents carve their children into their own ideals, ultimately abandoning who they truly are in the process. It's about bad parents raising "bad" kids. But mostly, it's about how love, above all, conquers. At the end of the day, you lose your memories, you fell out of the line...but love it could save you.

Great soundtrack, exciting, funny, amazing cast and acting and most of all entertaining without trying too hard. 4 hours? It'll pass by so fast you won't even notice it.

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?
Completed
Cold Fish
6 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Apr 6, 2016
Completed 0
Overall 7.0
Story 7.0
Acting/Cast 9.0
Music 9.0
Rewatch Value 7.0
Watch Coldfish with classic Sono Sion style in mind. Dark comedy, jarring music, long cuts and blood. After all, Sono is known for the extreme weird and freakish themes in his films. But this film is not for everyone. It's for the gore-seekers, the midnight madness, the avid supporters for cult-cinema which can either be a hit or miss audience to satisfy. With that though, Sono proves himself a master at his chosen niche market, though not perfect but shown with satisfying quality.

He opens the film with fast cuts paired with marching music that immediately sets the tone and the setting. The plot develops not through the revelations (the cliche way) but through dialogues, action and small details wrapped around in one perfect blanket. The clever way of using music that contradicts the scene is very Sono style but nevertheless, effective in bringing out the scene.

Dark, gray tones dominate the film with lots of red. Still, tropes like the typical-weak-salary man is still played and stretched towards the end that somehow makes the film repetitive. And with a 140 minutes running time, it's too long for a crime-thriller drama of this sort. The pacing is just too long, the narrative too dragging that at times, you just want to get to the excitement (and they aren't many). Expect blood and guts but don't expect excitement. Expect weirdness and undermined representations of women but don't expect excitement.

I'd praise the actors for their excellent portrayal though. Veteran actor, Denden plays the energetic-everyone's-uncle role so well mixed with humor and sadistic tendencies. Asuka Kurosawa (whom I've seen play a similar role in The World of Kanako) plays the seductive wife well and Mitsuru Fukikoshi plays the pathetic average man so well and that transformation at the end. Silent but deadly. He played it well.

It's more disturbing that the film is loosely based on the "Saitama murder of dog lovers" as you watch the film and have that in mind (though Sono makes a point that it's based on a true story in the beginning), it helps to establish the "credibility" and "sincerity" of what you're actually watching rather than just a make-believe murder tale because murder can be overrated.

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?
Completed
Why Don't You Play In Hell?
6 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Mar 20, 2016
Completed 0
Overall 8.0
Story 7.0
Acting/Cast 9.0
Music 7.0
Rewatch Value 7.0
Japanese auteur, Sion Sono's style has always been compared with Quentin Tarantino. I can't agree or disagree (because I haven't watch much of their films) but after seeing Why Don't You Play in Hell, I can at least understand the comparisons. Tarantino's only film that I've watched is Kill Bill and this is my only second Sono film (after the heavy drama, Himizu). I totally see the resemblance of style with these two films but that's not to say that Sono doesn't add his own allure for this movie.

If you're looking for entertainment at face value then Why Don't You Play in Hell is for you, compared with Sono's other psychological films like Himizu or epic, Love Exposure. WDPH is full of pleasure. It's an action-comedy guerrilla style, sometimes a teenage love story, sometimes a violent off-with-the-head shot or sometimes just...whatever. And that's totally okay. If it doesn't make sense, if it can't be explained, that's okay. WDPH is just that. It's a mish-mash of things that's suppose to be entertaining for everyone. Action, comedy, love story, friendship..yada, yada.

I especially love how all the sub-plots and story line just come in together and blend in towards the later part of the film. First, a yazuka story. Then, a rebellious young adult who meets a man that has loved her...for 10 year after seeing her in a commercial. Then an amateur-yet-passionate film crew that just wants to make the movie of the century. And all these story lines come in because of one thing: film. And here you are, watching a film too. Film-ception?

Everyone here is great. Angry, sad, crazy, all these emotions portrayed by the actors were great. Some of them I'm seeing the first time on screen. Everyone has such good chemistry, you can't really hate anyone...even with all the killing and blood. It's just so hilarious how Sono combines all the blood with comedy, all the killing and still make it feel so...light and heavy at the same time. The thing is, as you watch, you're always in for a surprise. You'll never know what to expect because of this mish-mash and unorthodox style. That's what's going to keep you hanging.

A slight comment on Fumi Nikaido. This is the third film that I've seen her in and yet again, she proves how much of a versatile actress (who got nominated for her performance here in the Asian Film Awards) she is. Heavy drama in Himizu, forbidden love in My Man and now a rebellious fighter. But she still keeps her signature acting that I totally love: that secrecy in her eyes that actually makes her scary (and very fun to watch).

Cinematography, sound and mere 35mm comparisons to digital is tackled and very much in sync with the overall film. If I can describe WDYPH, it's creatively entertaining. This is probably Sono's ode to Asian cinema and proves just how much amazing it can be.

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?
Completed
I Hear Your Voice
11 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Jan 7, 2015
18 of 18 episodes seen
Completed 0
Overall 8.5
Story 8.5
Acting/Cast 8.5
Music 7.5
Rewatch Value 8.0
The Plot/Setting:

It really is simple. Yet as you know with Korean dramas, the plot can never really just stayed simple. So as it progresses, it digs deeper. And effectively at that. I love how the series starts off smoothly, already presenting the plot and its backstory by Hye-song's storytelling during her public defender's interview. This to me, was a great way to introduce everything because we didn't have to go through a painful full-on flashback but rather telling it in a way that contributes both to the present happening and the establishment of what happened back then. It, in a way, also created suspense. And it also made me, as a viewer, connect the dots myself.

I really really do love how I Hear Your Voice made a great connection with all its character. One way or another, each character is affiliated with another. And even if it's just a little, it's central or it contributes to the plot. This connection is really cohesive, concise and very tight. Of course, it may not be perfect but it makes sense and upon discovery, it makes it much more exciting. Hye-song's past is connected to Soo-ha's and Joon-gook. Hye-song is also connected to Do-yeon, Do-yeon is connected to Dal-joong's. Lawyer Cha is connected to Lawyer Shin's in the past and that's only a minor detail yet it's great because it establishes the present relationship of the characters and the chemistry between all of them.

Now, I do love the flow of the story. The connection with the past to the present is strong and has always been reinforced. I liked the time span of the story as well. However, I wasn't really a fan of the time skip (the one year gap). I'm not a fan of time skips in general. To me, it always feel like there's something missing even if it does get mentioned or solved in the future, I want to see everything for myself. And that's exactly what I felt especially with what happened to Soo-ha. But I did like how the story played out. I think the drama's court and law elements is really a great treat for me, I've learnt a lot and my interest in law just intensified. But those elements itself really helped a lot with how the twists have turned out, it allows engagement with the audience to help in figuring out together with the lawyer. To some extent, it addresses what it means to be a lawyer and a public defender especially (even a prosecutor or a judge). There's a lot of value conflict and morals as well as surprising plot devices that you do not see coming. It's a mixture of comedy, romance, drama and even thriller and mystery.

But, I'm sad with how the series failed to really address its biggest plot device: Soo-ha's mind-reading. Given that everything in the plot is in touch with reality, his supernatural ability is in isolation. So it has to be addressed. Like, how? And why him? I'm sure it's not just some random decision to have that ability. It's true that it's very crucial and helpful to the plot and the characters, so for something so important to have no background at all really doesn't sit well with me.

The Characters:
This drama provides me with a deep set of characters that have their own individual characteristics which were explored. The thing is, every character that is in the drama had their roles and they needed to be there no matter how small that role is. Every character compliments one another, every interaction has chemistry even between the antagonist and the protagonist. You see, Min Joon Gook is not the meanest of the meanest but of course he, too is horrible. However, that cruelty is justified, not accepted but at least there are reasons for the way he is. This in a way, makes us as an audience understand his character despite being the villain.

His character compliments Park So Haa's and brings out the "beast" within him. There is great chemistry, I'm telling you. Even between Park So Haa and the two policemen. Every interaction feels like a crucial factor. You can basically come up with a ship for all these characters, they just have a great atmosphere together. One of my favorite is between Hye Song and Prosecutor Seo. It's such a bittersweet friendship. Like these two go way back and have such a long history together (an unpleasant one at that) and they're bickering towards each other is as much fun as how they try to hide their care for each other. It's such an interesting friendship. The subplot for Prosecutor Seo is also great, not only did it give her character depth and development but it also tied in the connections between the characters that no one is left out.

The Romance:
I get it. Lee Jong Suk has great chemistry with anyone. Be it a male or a female. (Okay, maybe I'm being a bit biased because I love Jong-suk but still) I know that age doesn't matter. I know that Park So Haa and Jang Hye Song are wonderful together and I ship them. Though, this tandem is not a romance for all. It has its audience. It appeals to some, it's weird to some. Some would not sit well with their almost 10 years gap. Some wouldn't care at all. That's just what I would say about it as a whole.

But as for me, this romance is not exactly 100% forbidden. There is a tendency to be. But it just depends on your own personal taste. I think that this romance is meant-to-be. It's much more fated than Cheon Song-Yi's and Do Min-Joon's in My Love From Another Star or at least it seemed much more like fate with how their story was presented. The connection, the history and all that are much more cohesive and united. Not to mention that yes, despite the fact that they can seem like brother-sister or pass on as a mere admiration, there is a stronger chemistry with these two. Of course, it is similar in some way to Song-Yi's and Min-Joon's, So Haa is more like the older and mature one of the two, the protector but that itself is great because it shows that differences can bring out the best and change in people. All I can say is, Lee Jong Suk is such a bae.

The Themes:
Do not live with hatred and revenge. Hate is heavy. Revenge can make you a monster. But you have the choice not to be a beast. You have the choice not to be slave to your past. As a whole, that's the drama's main focus. But to some extent, it also focuses on the value conflicts of lawyers. What is moral or immoral? Will you defend someone even if you think they commit a crime? Would you actually have to care about that or just do your job? It deals with a lot of themes regarding the past and regrets and it presents it well despite the tangled lives of its characters.

As much as I love the series, it doesn't shy away from the ever-so-cliche, alone and loneliness theme. Though it doesn't heavily focus on that, it does at some point become Min Jook Goon's driving force or at least contributed to it in some way.

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?
Completed
Confessions
7 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Mar 30, 2016
Completed 0
Overall 8.5
Story 8.0
Acting/Cast 9.0
Music 7.5
Rewatch Value 7.0
This review may contain spoilers
Well, it made the final shortlist in the Best Foreign Film category of the 83rd Academy Awards for a reason. From Kamikaze Girls and The World of Kanako director, Tetsuya Nakashima, Confessions is considered his opus. And with good reasons. This is based on the thriller novel by Kanae Minato.

With a strong 20 minutes opening monologue, Confession quickly establishes itself. It sets up the scene, introduces characters and creates conflict within 20 minutes with elaborate control and pristine intrigue. It's not perfect. It's not as detailed or as convincing especially actions coming from mere junior high school students but it enters a new type of fascination as a viewer. While the immoral practices presented in the film will make you question, it delivers the shock factor it needs. Perhaps the reason why it chooses that age group as its major protagonist (or should I say, antiheroes).

Confessions is a revenge thriller that is cleverly wrapped into a psychological film. Yes, the actions will cause shock (perhaps not even for the lighthearted) but it's the mental manipulation, the monotone, the poker face and the polite words that Moriguchi (played by Takako Matsu) that makes everything a perfect blow, up until the end, almost pulling a perfect Chekhov's gun.

While the intertwining confessions benefit viewers in giving a different perspective and a two-side of the story narration, it suffers from inconsistency especially in terms of clarity and length. Given the context of the story though, it makes you question how plausible the writing is. You can applaud Moriguchi's clever plotting but you question just how much, especially having junior high school kids here, how of much of what happens makes sense...in reality (being vague to avoid spoilers).

A contrast in terms of style with Nakashima's The World of Kanako which incorporates fast cuts and heightened overtones, Confessions is slow, filled with slow motions that adds dramatic effect but renders the stab to the heart effect. Irony and contrast is a recurring theme. Lots of irony. Contrast in overall cinematography with dark colors against white background reflect the melo-dramatic feel, sometimes emo ballad curled in psychological mindfuck that the film tries to take. Lots of dark gray tones creating a gloomy ambiance. Contrast with English music with ironic lyrics and dramatic scenes make the scenes stand out.

Ai Hashimoto, often called as an acting prodigy because of the massive pool of films under her belt at the age of 20 puts on her signature smug look that shows a character filled with secrecy. Yukito Nishii executes his character well, playing an innocent genius with dark secrets. His actions surprised me and I least expected that. He has great chemistry onscreen with Hashimoto. It's probably mean to say but Kaoru Fujiwara fits the stereotypical wimpy loner look which makes his acting effective and his eventual collapse all the more heartbreaking.

Overall, Confessions is not a perfect film but the acclaim it gets is the way it handles the psychological factors it imposes on its viewers. It tries to ask you teach you a lesson about life, but actually you don't need that lesson. That's a red herring in the film. Everything it "tries" to tell you, you already know. And I think the film is just showing these underlying "lessons" out in the open using young teenagers for elaborated effect. It's not a film about evil per say but the little hidden dark side in all of us. But I'm just glad that it wasn't the least bit romanticized.

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?
Completed
The Twilight Samurai
5 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Jun 8, 2016
Completed 0
Overall 9.0
Story 8.0
Acting/Cast 10
Music 8.0
Rewatch Value 8.0
Don't let the title put you off by thinking that you'll get some samurai action. You will. But not at the kind you're used to. Famed director, Yoji Yamada, known for his Tori-san works, delivers a melodramatic slow-paced film that carries weight and beauty in simplicity in The Twilight Samurai. It is an Oscar foreign nominated film for a reason. It won 12 Japanese Academy awards for a reason. This is inspired by the short story, "The Bamboo Sword" by by Shuhei Fujisawa.

Two hours did not feel like two hours. It's slow-paced but it's not the kind that drags on into unnecessary details. It's also not the metaphorical tale that other try to be, the story is straightforward, simple yet there's also something so enthralling about it. You'd want to see Seibi's character and how he'd go about his life as a petty samurai with two young daughters and a senile mother to look after. He's portrayed in a pitiful way but not in the way that makes you feel sad for him but at the same time, makes you root for him. He's neither depicted as likable or unlikable, just the way he is. Raw and real.

I definitely loved the aesthetics of this film. It's set in mid-19th century Japan and everything about it feels like that -- even the Japanese that they use. I guess it's the dialect (?) but it does give off a very historical feel even the way the characters act down to the little details of the clothes, hair and such. But the colors aren't crisp that it evokes a nostalgic and dramatic feel that echoes the overall tone of the film. It's a tale of mundane life that's amplified but still concise.

Hiroki Koreeda cites his style as more of Yamada to which this having my first Yamada film, I can finally see now. The attention to details, the simplicity and the subtle dramatic tension makes the film all more beautiful. Seibei and Tomoe's formal courtship is filled with dramatic tension -- just perfect for its time. While the lone "action scene" is stretched to the last 30 minutes or so, Yamada tries to keep us at the edge of our seats as the two characters (hero and villain) talk things out before launching into battle mode, only to force us to take deep breathes as he suddenly lunges at us.

All in all, The Twilight Samurai is ultimately about family. And while a mundane tale, Seibei and the narrator (the daughter's) words make it a poetic, almost poignant one.

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?
Completed
Hana & Alice
6 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Jul 13, 2016
Completed 0
Overall 8.5
Story 8.0
Acting/Cast 9.0
Music 9.0
Rewatch Value 8.0
When it comes to cinematography, Shinji Iwai and his films are my absolute favorite. Whenever I watch his work, I'm always hit with a raging wave of nostalgia. There is so much simplicity, so much pureness and delight that just tugs at your heartstrings. Hana and Alice is filled with so much beauty and a simple tale of friendship and growing up that I couldn't help but smile and laugh like I'm a teenager all over again.

Watching this (as many other reviewers noted) was like reading a love letter. You see the story of two best friends, liking the same guy. That probably sounds shallow but it's something that happens in real life especially as you grow up and experience the wonders of a first love. And that's precisely why I love Hana and Alice. It's simplicity as a story calms you. It's nothing more than a simple tale that doesn't try to be too much than that it originally intended.

Iwai just delivers everything with such beauty. The colors aren't exotic nor are they bright but in a way, there's so mellow (but not in that dark way) and so refreshing to the eyes that you also fall in love with what you see on screen. These colors makes you feel closer to the characters and their story. Each scene, each setting is filled with visual beauty, I cannot praise it enough. Add some amazing soundtrack, the feels are everywhere. Especially for me, who has just entered her twenties.

The balance between Hana and Alice's life is also a nice touch, the other doesn't outshine the other. After all, this is about them. The similarities (absence of a male figure in their life, ballet) but also the contrast (Alice's house is filled with messy things while Hana's house is filled with flowers) shows the attention to details, the delicate choice that Iwai made. Also, Anne Suzuki and Yu Aoi just have such amazing chemistry together.

Yu Aoi's ballet dance sequence is so mesmerizing, I can watch her all day long. Anne Suzuki's heartbreaking confession is so pure, so heartfelt so evident of growing up, it brings back loads of memories.

Shinji Iwai is a great director that really does deserve more praise. He cares about setting as much as he cares about story as much as he cares about character. There's a fine balance of that here. (Always love his works with Yu Aoi too!)

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?
Completed
Pieta in the Toilet
4 people found this review helpful
by Jia M
Sep 20, 2017
Completed 0
Overall 8.0
Story 7.0
Acting/Cast 8.0
Music 8.0
Rewatch Value 7.0
Hilariously titled, Pieta in the Toilet marks RADWIMPS frontman, Yoji Noda's acting debut. And what better debut than to work alongside rising young Japanese actress, Hana Sugisaki, who at her young age has been garnering awards including a best supporting actress at the Japan Academy Awards.

Pieta in the Toilet is a mix of arthouse feature and an indie flick. Daishi Matsunaga crafts a beautifully poignant film that feels very raw and honest. He does this with simplicity. Forget dramatic sun flares or slow motions, the use of sound, dialogue and camera work makes the emotions overflow.

Noda and Sugisaki have an interesting dynamic much like their respective characters—a struggling painter and an angst-ridden teenager. In them, an unusual friendship forms. It's actually such a treat to see these two interact. Noda embodies a just-get-by character, soft spoken and at times, even delicate and Sugisaki counters that. Loud, headstrong and jarring, she delivers with such fluidity, it's lovely to watch her on screen.

Pieta in the Toilet doesn't patronize. In fact, it doesn't try too hard given its somewhat melodramatic plot. Instead, its characters are the highlight. I would have just probably wanted for the characters to be fleshed out more. And instead of speaking between the lines, it's much more better to be direct. I feel like that part leaves too much blanks to feel.

But nevertheless, the cinematography is to love. And the overall aesthetic and colors are very flat—embodying the film's very characters. Powerful ending.

To those who don't understand the title and say it has nothing to do with the film. Actually, it does. Especially in the final moments.

Read More

Was this review helpful to you?