KJCTdramafan:

Yay!  Questions:  does the fiancé die and who kills her?  Does Jing die and who kills him?  Does FL ever regain her powers (get unsealed)? 

 XL vampire demon (lol) : when his bird is small and chubby he has the peach blossom inbetween his eyes. does that have any connection to XY or ever mentioned?  

Thanks!!

It's Jing. It's always been Jing <3

XY poisoned herself, also poisoned CX but the dose wasn’t much for him, so he lived. Jing didn’t die, but was in a coma for 7 years, he didn’t know until he woke up and found out 7 years had passed.
Xiao Yaos powers were weakened due to the fox demon who captured & tortured her for decades.

@MTH123 

Wow. That's a particularly great point. It's sad. I have heard that war can become more about fighting for your fellow brothers than the cause. But, in this case, they did have a cause originally. So, apparently, they lost the forest through the trees at some point. War doesn’t require people to fight to their certain deaths with no other option. A normal response would have been to be happy that their people were living in a better world and to go back to live with them. Then, XL would automatically have been free to pursue XY.

Tong Hua does seem to like the concept of undying loyalty to an army. XL did this for his rebel army. In the prequel, XY’s father did this for his army too. It made XY’s parents enemies on the battlefield and caused them both to “die” in the same battle. Come to think of it, there are other parallels between XL’s situation and XY’s father’s situation too that caused them to be undyingly loyal.

It took me the longest time to figure out that XL would never have pursued a relationship with XY, because of his commitment to his army. I was also slow to realize that XL knew that he would be fighting to his certain death. For example, XL could have asked ZX for anything to save XY’s life. He could have asked him to leave the rebel army alone. But, he didn’t. He asked for a burial place. Why? So, his fellow soldiers could die honorably on the battlefield? But, is it really honorable to die in this case? I would say that it’s more sad than honorable.

The concept of being filial to elders in ancient Chinese culture can be strong too. TSJ pushed back hard against his grandmother. But, he ultimately lost to her on every count. XY readily understood every time he lost too. (I think you’re right about XY.) XL probably didn’t even have an opportunity to push back against Gong Gong, because he had become delusional. So, XL was stuck too.


I think the idea  / philosophy is  that if you fight only for things you can win, it's about gaining a result -- it's an intellectual exercise.  If you fight for a lost cause, it can only be about principle and sacrifice -- it's a test of heart and soul.  The ideal of sacrifice, both for the greater good and for principle carries more weight in Asia than it does in the West, I think.

In Japan, Chūshingura aka 47 Ronin is a popular and enduring story that illustrates some of the motivations of Xiang Liu and the rebel Chenrog army and even Gong Gong (I can't say for sure since we haven't seen in the drama and I haven't read the book).  After their lord was forced to kill himself, under shady circumstances, these samurai retainers, who swore personal loyalty to their lord, don't seek new lords, but endure hardship and wait years before taking revenge and killing the noble responsible for their lord's death, knowing they will die for doing so.  Likewise, because of personal loyalty, because Gong Gong is his lord (or his father), XL has to follow him to death.

In modern times the idea of dying for a principle or honor isn't viewed well, for obvious reasons, and it can be seen as selfish.  I mean, they don't talk about what happened to the families of the 47 Ronin.  It was one of the interesting debates of Game of Thrones' first season, with Ed Stark's refusal to compromise and dying.  He kept his honor and died with his principles, but so much of the death and destruction that  happened afterwards could by laid at his feet for this decision.

 Kokuto:
The ideal of sacrifice, both for the greater good and for principle carries more weight in Asia than it does in the West, I think.

You made so many great points! Thank you! I did watch 47 Ronin long ago. I found it entertaining, but sad to say, most of the larger concepts were over my head. :( I need to think more... lol?

 MTH123:

You made so many great points! Thank you! I did watch 47 Ronin long ago. I found it entertaining, but sad to say, most of the larger concepts were over my head. :( I need to think more... lol?


NP!  I'm sure there is more to it, that may be explained in the novel.

If it was the Keanu Reeves version, it doesn't really deal the historical story or emphasize those ideas.   I enjoyed the old 60s version with Toshiro Mifune, but it was slow, and I have to be in the right frame of mind for it.  The wiki article talks about the ideals, the influences / origins in Confucianism, political opposition, etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ch%C5%ABshingura

 Kokuto:
If it was the Keanu Reeves version, it doesn't really deal the historical story or emphasize those ideas. I enjoyed the old 60s version with Toshiro Mifune, but it was slow, and I have to be in the right frame of mind for it.

Which Keanu Reeves are you referring to?

 Kokuto:

The American movie from a few years ago.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1335975/

Oh, I'm surprised I never watched it! I was an American-movie-aholic until I discovered Chinese romance dramas in 2020 (or late 2019).

On Edit: I probably did watch it and wasn't impressed. So, I don't remember it much.

 MTH123:

Oh, I'm surprised I never watched it! I was an American-movie-aholic until I discovered Chinese romance dramas in 2020 (or late 2019).

On Edit: I probably did watch it and wasn't impressed. So, I don't remember it much.

It was generally panned. :)

I thought it was ok as a generic fantasy movie, but it wasn't 47 Ronin.

 Kokuto:

It was generally panned. :)

I thought it was ok as a generic fantasy movie, but it wasn't 47 Ronin.

I have never understood remaking movies if you don't make it just as well. Examples that leap to my mind are Charade and Sabrina.

Seriously. 

What actor has the cojones to think they are going to do better than Audrey Hepburn and Cary Grant?

 hahahahahahahah!

 Kokuto:

Seriously. 

What actor has the cojones to think they are going to do better than Audrey Hepburn and Cary Grant?

 hahahahahahahah!

Exactly! :D As much as I like Harrison Ford... And, the FL was the first time I ever saw her in anything. Wow, did she have humongous shoes to try to fill. She wasn't even close!

On Edit: Cary Grant was my favorite actor of that era. Audrey Hepburn was one of my favorite actresses of that era.

This is so funny, hope they'll keep it for S2!

(Ch.35) - Xiang Liu earnestly said “You know I have nine heads and at most I eat more than others. Since I was small I scrounged around for food and my days were absolutely the pits. I’d get beaten and chased and almost killed. My nine heads would sometimes fight with each other. One time I was so hungry one head almost ate another head……..”

Xiao Yao’s eyes widened into saucers “Really?”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  (XD!!!)

 Symbolika1:

This is so funny, hope they'll keep it for S2! 

(Ch.35) - Xiang Liu earnestly said “You know I have nine heads and at most I eat more than others. Since I was small I scrounged around for food and my days were absolutely the pits. I’d get beaten and chased and almost killed. My nine heads would sometimes fight with each other. One time I was so hungry one head almost ate another head……..”

Xiao Yao’s eyes widened into saucers “Really?”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  (XD!!!)

Me too! I need more funny banter between them. 

That is hilarious!  I do love their banter.

长相思  Lost You Forever was the last of Tong Hua's historical novels written in 2012.  According to an interview with 书生说 The Scholar Speaks, she felt at the time that it was the most well-written of her works, but upon reviewing it after many years,  she felt that that it was lacking in some areas.  As such, she published a revised edition in 2019 which she tried to address the areas that she regretted in the original. 

May I know whether anyone has read both the original version and the revised edition? If so, can you please share the areas that she revised? It would be interesting to see the progression in her thought process after 7 years. I recently bought the 2023 edition, which should be the revised edition. Have not had a chance to read it properly yet but a quick glance  shows that the epilogue remains unchanged. Thank you in advance!