Not feeling this one - he comes over as an irritating smarmy smart ass and she well, every time I start liking her she moons off into weird decision land.
Loathed the lead characters and in the end pretty much skipped all their scenes for the supporting cast. Thoroughly enjoyed the support relationships and would have been quite happy if SolJiwan were the leads instead. So I can't really judge this as a whole but the mardy, maudlin relationship of the leads might as well have been what I don't like 101.
First few episodes were a fun but then it just became a grind. So many characters barely used - the grandma, the same shirt chap (where did he go?) NJ, just about every one. Got tired of the main couple too - just why? The original documentary parts were the best bits. Shame! great cast and production values, even the OST was ok and yet it just bored me. Got to 10 with FF and then gave up.
Found the ML creepy and the FL uninteresting and together they had no chemistry. Seen them both in other dramas and rated then so I assume it's just the writing and direction in this. Definitely a miss for me.
Here here! I'm still upset about Well Intended Love years after dropping it.
Consent is important and poor behaviour passed off as 'romance/fluff' should be called out at every opportunity. If I think about the differences in attitudes towards consent, equality, LGTBQ rights and so on from what they were in my teens, 40 years ago, to now; most of it came from having these conversations, from making people think about their behaviour.
Who are these adults who are feminist that like it? By what definition are they feminist? By what right do you…
What questions? "But you didn't tell me about the abuse part and also the other appreciated shows which did not get criticised for racism or homophia (sic) in today's time." The next comment I made addressed the 'abuse part' and why should I tell you about "other shows"? You are the one that said "And secondly there are maybe one or only 2 racist or homophic (sic) content that got more appreciated than criticised in this day and time."
"you still have to tell me about shows where homophia (sic) and racism were widely celebrated." Again not my point, yours.
"What's the point of discussion with a person like you then." If you think that then why are you still discussing it with me?
"what do you know? What did you get from above?" I know all sorts of stuff about all sorts of things. Not much as you just make statements without anything to back them but 'feelings'.
Were there any other questions you asked? Will you answer mine now?
Who are these adults who are feminist that like it? By what definition are they feminist? By what right do you…
Rather than just say, 'hey it might be wrong but I like the show' you have to make up reasons for that to be ok. You make outrageous claims but say it isn't up to you to fact check them. You constantly try to turn the conversation with ad hominem attacks and strawmen.
Subjective well-being is a part of mental health I believe that's what's confusing you. The actions which comprise 'bullying' as per any number of references including the one I gave above are not changed by the intentions behind them. Address these points and I'll answer you.
Who are these adults who are feminist that like it? By what definition are they feminist? By what right do you…
In fact would you send me a paper - preferably peer reviewed - on how having affection for and a desire to better someone negates the effect of bullying on mental health as well as one on mental health being subjective. Only two and then we can discuss them? I've been proved wrong before and whilst I don't like it I will (grudgingly) admit it. So why not try?
1 
The original documentary parts were the best bits.
Shame! great cast and production values, even the OST was ok and yet it just bored me. Got to 10 with FF and then gave up.
Definitely a miss for me.
Consent is important and poor behaviour passed off as 'romance/fluff' should be called out at every opportunity. If I think about the differences in attitudes towards consent, equality, LGTBQ rights and so on from what they were in my teens, 40 years ago, to now; most of it came from having these conversations, from making people think about their behaviour.
"But you didn't tell me about the abuse part and also the other appreciated shows which did not get criticised for racism or homophia (sic) in today's time."
The next comment I made addressed the 'abuse part' and why should I tell you about "other shows"? You are the one that said "And secondly there are maybe one or only 2 racist or homophic (sic) content that got more appreciated than criticised in this day and time."
"you still have to tell me about shows where homophia (sic) and racism were widely celebrated." Again not my point, yours.
"What's the point of discussion with a person like you then." If you think that then why are you still discussing it with me?
"what do you know? What did you get from above?" I know all sorts of stuff about all sorts of things. Not much as you just make statements without anything to back them but 'feelings'.
Were there any other questions you asked? Will you answer mine now?
Subjective well-being is a part of mental health I believe that's what's confusing you.
The actions which comprise 'bullying' as per any number of references including the one I gave above are not changed by the intentions behind them.
Address these points and I'll answer you.
I won't find papers for you though I mean goodness me why should I have to prove what I say?