Kn0cturnal

I checked back and noticed they don't look wooden so nice point.

But then explain how he got into that next door room to break the wall in the first place ?

His room is 408 and not next to the room he was getting into.

And if he had to break down the door to get into that next door room then it made no sense to go around. So door was unlocked by chance in that next door room ?

I am talking based on webtoon which this is sourced from.

Kids story we got in first 7 episodes was already way more then in source material and in future they are side characters to parents.

In present we will get more about relationship with parents then anything else and friendship between kids unless they change it and make it into romance.

Them taking time with each of these characters is making us care for them. Condensing the story doesn't have the same effect.

As to your question on why they decided to go that way with kids in initial few episodes I am gonna asume it's to bait in larger demographic and at same time create mystery with gaps that can be filled in later episodes.

Initial shift is probably surprising but I don't see there being issue in being able to follow episodes if they are fully dedicated to one story. It should actually make it very easy to follow.

Parents are the leads, kids are minor characters so in future you will only be disappointed if you expect major focus on kids again.

The thing standing between him and her was a door that he walked away from to take the longer route and harder method. It made no sense other then it looked better.

There was nothing discrete about either method and he prob broke down door in next door apartment because his apartment was 408 and not the one next to it.

Well he was initially at the door so if you lose yourself and go into rage you will prob knock down the door not semi casually walk away and go around to take down the wall which takes way longer 🤣

I am just wondering why he would punch down a brick wall instead of kick in the wooden door ? Lol

It's neither of what you mentioned.

It's very good show that I highly recommend and super powers are just element of the show.

Cinematography and story telling is top notch.

If I had to pick marvel then closest one this one is in terms of vibes and some direction is prob daredevil series especially later episodes. Ep11 definitely inspired by Oldboy.

Idk my mind is prob dirty and I found it funny because I imagined 2nd hand is somewhere else at same time based on his facial expressions.

I liked this one more because lines are more blurred and while we have comedy and dark stuff it still feels like we are warching one cohesive product.

In that other one scenes seem disjointed and out of place so it takes me out of the moment. It's not only constrast of slapstick comedy to tragedy but the whole way of how it is shot and handled with tone it feels like different genre. Imo murders and crimes in that show should be done in more dark comedy way not thriller/ crime show.

I had issue with show identity in that kdrama running rn where FL touches butts to have vision. The transitions of slapstick comedy to kidnapping/murder/ etc. was jarring af especially because the tone also completly shifted and didn't feel as one cohesive vision.

After seeing that show this one seems kinda fine in comparison as it blends genres better and I didn't feel that jarring transition but I am gonna asume it's gonna be mostly comedic at start and then later go little into melodrama combined with flashbacks.

It's to early to see if it will fall apart but atm it seems decent tho 1st episode wasn't anything special it's still better then I initially expected.

What are the odds of having same bridge and fireworks and them walking towards each other as the 19th life drama this year. It seems almost like same shot for shot :S

I am talking about the netflix short trailer.

Well I said I disagree on CEO not deserving to be his friend. You didn't give any reasons on why he doesn't deserve to be his friend.

I didn't talk anything about CEO being good or bad or that I only see his good sides. I just said he is the only friend he has and while they both have positives and negatives their relationship is by far mostly positive and healthy while not ideal. Everyone can also be somewhat selfish and self preserving in relationship and they both display that and on other hand they also both display selfless acts. You just seem to root yourself very one sided from ML perspective instead as impartial outside observer.

I am not talking about me liking or disliking a character, I am talking about their relationship dynamic so if you personally dislike a character that doesn't matter here. CEO is more pragmatic, logical and can come of somewhat calculated and cold but that makes sense for someone in his position and I guess it can be mistaken by not caring or something. CEO also has wife, daughter and ton of employees who may suffer from ML doing reckless stuff that ceo went out on a limb and risked his association with him. What he was doing in this episode makes sense for him and for safety of ML.

I only made one remark and didn't judge you so don't make more out of this then it is. This is nothing personal and was used to demonstrate the absurdity of deciding friendship worth or being deserved in your case. I asume you made a comment on him not deserving to be his friend because they had 1 fight in last episode that was also somewhat a misunderstanding and neither expressed what they ment best and because you probably have biased dislike for his character which in this case doesn't make a good argument.

So tell me what makes CEO deserving and not deserving of being his friend and viceversa ?

Very well made kdrama. Exceeded my expectations for it.

You would probably cut off all your friends because they didn't deserve and fit your idealistic perfect vision of what friend must be.

CEO is the only friend he has that actually potentially cares for him and while he may not be ideal he is still there for him when needed as of now.

CEO is pragmatic and moraly gray so his logical approach may come off unlikeable to some people who expect character to be idealistic care free bubblehead.

I like his character because it makes for someone in that position to act like that or he wouldn't be as there. Idk how many people here don't understand that just because someone straight up isn't basically caricature of moral pure made up non exsistent person doesn't mean they are some evil master mind but actual real person.

I am not saying I like them but it's not like I won't watch next episode because of it is what I am saying..

I had ex who threatened me with self harm if I ignore her. Some people try anything to cling onto you and can't move on or see there are other options. Problem with Syaon is she thinks ML is her only chance for love so she got it twisted and does desperate stuff for attention. I must say it doesn't help that it's effective tactic to keep people around and make them doubt or guilt trip. It's very emotionally straining and if you try and break from it you could blame yourself if something actually happen.

Some form of manipulation was common in my past relationships but it was mostly when I was in 14-20 so it's a little more understandable to pull some stupid stuff as kids with hormone overload.

I don't know if its translated proper to english. Maybe in Korean sentence is structured different for that to make sense but saying you didn't kill someone is still true if they are alive so that makes no sense to be a lie. So it's either translation is not accurate or something else.

Cliffhangers work that's why you see them. Big majority of people don't drop series they are hooked on because of minor annoyance of cliffhanger on the other hand it keeps many more to keep watching who were on the fence or enjoying it.

I don't think what he does is reporter job. Atleast in my country you are definitely breaking ethical codex doing this and that guy even breaking some laws.

But it is something someone at magazine would do or paparazzi and I don't consider those reporters.