etoks21

"I'm not going to be baited by your theatrics," says the person who was just baited by my "theatrics." lol

"...her (alleged) pain..." ...at being "inappropriately touched." I'm sure this person is in desperate agony at being "inappropriately touched." lol
In a sane world, free of ME TOO! hysterics/fanatics, she would have responded to being "inappropriately touched" (which he has denied in court and plead not guilty to) by slapping him across the face and throwing a drink to follow, and that would have been the end of it. And if he then escalated the situation, we might have something to talk about.

But oh no, we must run to the cops and alert the press because it's an idol, and not at all in the hopes of suing him for big bucks later Had she been groped by some average Joe, she would have punched him, kicked him in the nuts, and walked away.

I repeat, WHO IS SHE? We know who KK is, why does she get to remain anonymous? Don't you want women to fearlessly stand up for themselves and proudly make accusations when warranted? What's the shame? YOU are the shamer here. I'd grant this person some credibility if she had the ovaries to identify herself, rather than hiding behind a cloak of MeToo anonymity. You see women as helpless victims, not people.

BTW, stop putting words in my mouth and then arguing against them. I repeat, I had no idea who KK was before his BL and didn't give him another thought afterwards until this bogus accusation and KK's subsequent pre-trial crucifixion came to pass. Quit attempting to dismiss sane, non-hysterics by claiming they're fanboys/girls when they're not.

Try not to be "baited by my theatrics" again. BTW again...you're pretty damn theatrical yourself.

lol !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I repeat: You think you're clever. You're not.

Spoilers aren't opinions, they are spoilers.
I have watched this film five times.

Reported

Reported

It's clear you are deliberately being a jerk about this, but I'll try anyway: Yes, it is a 2008 movie, but there will always be people coming to this page before they watch it for the first time. This is true for thousands of older films and series. People discover and watch them for the first time five, ten, 20 years later.

You think you're clever, but you're not. Put your spoilers behind a spoiler button.

I feel bad for these Asian actors, who have to struggle to answer interview questions without saying much out of fear of being canceled by Knetz, should they say an interesting word, that will promptly be misinterpreted. Their phrasing and word choices, carefully vetted by their agency, come off as childish and often, a bit dim-witted.

Love So Ji Sub though, and glad to see him back in another show.

Just finished my fifth watch of this film. It gets better, deeper, richer with every viewing.

Commenters here making black/white pronouncements about the characters, motivations, actions, and most of all, about who is most to "blame," are too modern-minded to appreciate this movie, which is about as close as it comes to being a "masterpiece" (a word tossed around like confetti here on MDL) as it gets.

In truth, I think I watched several scenes through more fingers, and wept more this time than I did during my first viewing, and that's saying a lot because the first time I kept falling out of my chair. There is no more gasp-inducing, dramatic scene in cinema than the penultimate one in the library about 3/4 way in. My god.

11/10

lol Sure you're not.

This film, with its layers, complications, and shades of gray, is far over your head. Stick to Disney.

SPOILERS! Use the button.

Multiple exclamation marks don't make your assertions any more coherent or your homophobia any less clear. As I mentioned above, movies like this aren't for people who think in as simple terms as you do.

There is no such thing as "a gay."

Did you think the Chief looked "helpless" in those early make-out scenes with the King? Ever hear of bisexuality, or the fluidity of the sexual continuum?

This flick is far too layered and complicated for your uncomplicated mind.

Your comment is a collection of massive spoilers. Please use the button.

He set things in motion, yes AND they both, but especially the Chief, lied to and betrayed him multiple times after that...

Shades of gray, like the real world.

I think it had been a few months by then. Remember, she was barely _________ at the time of the wild-ass library scene. When he returned, she was as big as a house.

You can tell from your comments here who has a black-and-white perspective on the world. This film is over your head.

lol

"Regardless of the nudity and the sexually explicit scenes, the film is worth watching. It's too painfully awe-aspiring."

What do you mean, "regardless?" The nudity and sex are big pluses! :D

I just finished my fifth watch of this film in about as many years. It gets better every time. I find significant details I missed before with each new viewing. One of the best films of all time, in my book. 11/10+