gingerkiss

Yeah, this. At first I was really scratching my head over the villain but I think he's not the usual type of villain we expect. Let's hope he gets more interesting.

Yeah, the villain right now is a bit unconvincing. Let's see.

So in the trailer, there was this scene of Yo Han shooting at PTJ on a bike. I was wondering where that came from so it's part of the game.

I thought I would watch 1 episode per day but ended up, I just couldn't stop. I think cos in the movie, they also featured him in action playing games and that was pretty cool. Different feel here but I like. JCW is really immersed in the role and that hooks most of us right in too. I hope you'll give the rest of the episodes a shot and will enjoy it more like most of us.

Same. I dropped BOY on first watch. Picked it up after watching Dashing Youth. But can hardly remember the story now.

An Yo Han is actually quite an interesting character. This character is a bit underwhelming now because the focus was on PTJ but that should change from next episode onwards when we see more of him interacting with others. What's interesting is how they make him look childlike...he looks like a kid, and his dressing is also youngish (with a backpack), and he also highlighted his "youth" to the head of police. There is also his habit of eating M&Ms and playing with lego. So his outward appearance belies his inner thoughts...which are dark and twisted. So I'm quite intrigued by what the writer wants to portray or convey through this villain.

Yes, I think so. And Yo Han is protecting him by cleaning up his act and framing others. I think the man at the auction might be LKS's dad in the show.

I didn't expect his brother too. Someone is speculating that the gf might have been involved. IDK. But if she is...PTJ was really screwed big time.

Some of the synopsis are even wrong. Ha. Anyway, I think it's a combination. They might read the synopsis and then look at the ratings or even the comments. Not everyone does that...that's why I said "might". Some people don't give a hoot about the ratings. Anyway, I was really trying to answer to the original poser.

The original poser asked: Does MDL rating affect a Drama in anyway and I answered to that. It does not have bearing on awards of course.

Sorry, doing a good job at what? Synopsis only tells you what the show is about. It does not tell you if it's worth watching. Many people go by rating to gauge, or ask in the comments.

I think a low rating might deter more people from watching.

Well, say what you want, rate what you want. Who knows what's really true? The fact was I saw the edit sometime after I posted my comment. It's your words against your words. Anyway your comments already gave you away...denying that you are meta-policing when you were. It's out here. Everyone can read.

4 ratings after having watched 4 episodes. I couldn't help but think it was 1 rating for each episode. Haha.

Fair enough. But winning is more your agenda. I'm done with you too. Thanks for contributing to the 7.9 rating of this show when only 4 episodes were shown so far.

If this is not your first language, why do you want to write a comment to criticize other commenters? Like seriously, keep your comments to yourself. So you save yourself from having to edit what you wrote or backpedal.

Since English isn't your first language, don't use strong words like "police" because that changes the entire tone. And FYI, meta-policing means criticizing or calling out the act of policing itself. It’s “policing the policing" which was exactly what you did. You probably didn't like/agree with my usage of this word on you. So do you think others would have liked that you use the word "police" on them when they were simply crying that they think the rating is not fair?

This person is now backpedaling after being called out. He/She even edited the original comment after reading my response. Sounds like a bigot who thinks he/she knows it all.

You did say it doesn't deserve. This is from your original comment: "It will probably end up above 8 (and not because it deserves it)."

Oh now you edit your comment after reading my response? Huh. So much for your credibility and your "fair" rating.

Saying what’s “fair” or “not outrageous” is still a form of judgment on how others rate. That’s why it came across as meta-policing. Anyway, you’re entitled to your opinion and your rating, but others have the right to comment on it too. So there’s really no need to be snarky about people pointing it out...especially when your own low rating helped pull the average down below most expectations.