Living Tribunal

Is there anything wrong with the picture though? She just shared a intimate photo of them. We don't know about their relationship yet. And has Kim Soo Hyun done anything wrong yet. He is literally the cleanest actor in the Korean industry without any major controversies. So why are insinuating something is wrong with him?

It won't even affect the drama and Kim Soo Hyun. She is just trying to gain attention as the drama is getting more popularity.

Who?

I think everytime I will see her in a new drama, I will always feel she will turn evil at some point.

Yes, she was

I meant that you are only taking Hae In's side without even considering Hyun Woo's. Where did you see in the drama Hyun Woo saying that he is only treating her well so that he can get a part of her will? It was his friend's idea, not his own. If he wanted her wealth, the least problematic solution would have been to let her have an affair with Eun Seung (supposedly) and then blackmail her or get a divorce with proper alimony. But he didn't do that; he was trying to save her every time, which was visible to everyone, even Hae In. But the case with Hae In is that she does things for him, cares for him, but without showing it to him. The biggest problem between them is communication, but the way Hae In acts makes it worse. She doesn't see that her husband is being humiliated in her house, while in his house, his family members are treating her as their own. She was still maintaining her ice-cold persona when they lost their baby, without doing anything to show that she is grieving. Even in episode 1, she was so nonchalant about the baby issue as if they hadn't lost their baby before, which became a traumatic situation for both of them. In my opinion, showing is caring. In a relationship, no matter how much a person does for me in the background, if I don't see him/her doing anything substantial for the benefit of the relationship, I won't be sure they are in love with me or care for me.

So, did Hae In get to know about the divorce papers or not?

I think you didn't watch the episodes properly.

So, she is a good kisser on screen right?

I don't know. I haven't really watched her dramas. That's why I was asking.

It might seem like a weird question, but I just wanted to ask: How are ZLY and LGX in kissing scenes? Can we expect some decent kissing scenes, or not? If we can't, then there shouldn't be any kissing, like those dead fish kisses we often see in dramas.

Ok thanks

Did Shen Li get married?

In the case of SFL, they are always portrayed as evil, while SML are most of the time portrayed as a walking and talking green flag. So I don't think they are equally balanced. And if old writers were portraying ML as having many wives and pursuers, it doesn't mean that new writers should also do that. I believe "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."

You are referring to Sushant Singh Rajput, right? We still don't know if he committed suicide due to pressure from big actors snatching movies from him or some other reason. I don't understand why people are being so mysterious about SSR's death. People sympathize with him after his death, yet they didn't even go to watch most of his movies in theaters, except "MS Dhoni: The Untold Story," which, by the way, had more appeal to audiences due to its director, Neeraj Pandey. He struggled to attract audiences to theaters, which is why he wasn't getting good roles in Bollywood. To be honest, Bollywood is a profit-making industry, not one that should engage in charity by giving roles to people not related to them. Btw CBI is still investigating what happened to him. If it's true that he committed suicide due to pressure from Bollywood big shots, then I'm sure they will be punished. However, I don't believe in this theory. Yes, perhaps SSR wasn't getting good movies, but it doesn't mean his roles were being snatched. There are many self-made actors in Bollywood from his generation who are doing well despite being outsiders, like Kartik Aaryan, Rajkumar Rao, Ayushmann Khurrana, etc. These individuals don't have any godfathers, yet they are thriving. So, blaming his suicide on Bollywood without any proof is not acceptable.

You are discussing the SFL in "Marry My Husband." Yes, she wasn't getting good roles and dramas despite having great acting skills, but you can't solely blame the production houses and other wealthy actors. Her past dramas didn't perform well among audiences, failing to generate hype or profit for the makers. Chungmuro is a profit-driven industry and won't provide opportunities solely based on talent or popularity. Take Lee Yi Kyung, the SML in "Marry My Husband," for example. He comes from a Chaebol family and despite his acting skills, he isn't widely recognized among the masses. He hasn't starred in any popular dramas except "Welcome to Waikiki." Audiences themselves are not supporting these actors, so we can't solely blame production houses for their limited roles in dramas.

You said that you liked "Branding in Seongsu," I agree it was good. But just because it has new actors doesn't mean that you can overlook its flaws. The story in the drama was good, but there weren't enough romantic moments between the leads to sell us their romance. Also, what was that about the last-minute breakup thing? Do you expect someone to wait for you just because you have some lingering traumas without any contact? The helpers of the antagonist, mainly Jung Woo and Yoo Mi, didn't even get proper punishments. How did Yoo Mi's heart change all of a sudden? She suddenly becomes chummy with Na Eon just because of a sorry, whereas previously she was trying to ruin her life. The plot wasn't cohesive, and the only saving grace of the drama was the leads, their chemistry, and their hot kisses. So before commenting about how "Queen of Tears" is bad and overhyped, which, by the way, hasn't even properly aired right now, think about the flaws of the drama you are comparing it to.

Kim So Hyun was also a rookie at one point. He proved himself with his script selections and acting, which is why he is the highest-paid actor. He didn't have a chaebol father or connections in the industry, but still, he thrived and proved himself again and again. Supporting new or small actors is not wrong, but if they themselves are not doing good work, then it doesn't mean that you have to support them because of the inherent sympathy you have for them.

You are literally saying that Queen of Tears is overhyped and bad just because it has popular actors. However, here you are contradicting your previous statement . Don't attach money, corporate problems, or small actors not getting a chance to the dramas. They are polar opposites to each other. You should watch dramas for the acting by the actors, the way the story is presented, and how everything comes in full circle.

I think you are the type of person who likes things just because they're cheap rather than something good, even if it's more expensive. You know capitalism is everywhere; every industry has to make a profit, and rich actors are generally more popular among the masses and will bring more money to production houses. Why would they use their money on unpopular actors if they aren't going to give them profit? I think you are probably one of those people who hates nepotism in Bollywood, but if someone close to you strongly referred you for a job or you are probably using your parents' connections, you would probably be fine with it.