mooc

Unless you failed at school, it's not a comparison.
It's basically the law when it comes how sex must be conducted in a marriage.

You all conveniently shout the first part of law & willfully forget and some even blatantly lie about the other part, the cruelty of denying love and affection in a marriage.

Only perverted animals would be ok with one and not the other,

She is NOT a morally grey character, if she was a man in any kdrama, she would be the villain.
She is a horrendous kunt.

again, you need to go and read the law.
Similar to how it's rape to have sex with an unwilling wife, it is cruelty if wife stops having sex with her husband.

Just because the FL is a cheating kunt, does not mean you all need to support that said kunt and her cruel and insane actions.

it is dear.
You need to check the laws.
It is under section called 'cruelty' and a valid reason for a divorce.

If one is marrying and telling their spouse 'no sex in our marriage' a minute after the marriage, that person needs to be destroyed and be made an example, publicly.
And only completely insane people would ever say 'it's ok to never have sex in a marriage'.

Funny thing is, if it was the ML who did this in the drama where he fked the FL in the morning, married another perfectly innocent woman for money in afternoon, told his new wife to fk herself and was looking to shag the FL in the evening - then we would have seen what you really thought of the whole thing.

It's just disgusting to read the crap being posted here just because the FL is cheating kunt.

There are gay men in few countries, who hide it, get married and end up destroying the wife's life.
It happens regularly, do you think the woman whose life was destroyed by a gay man should just accept her fate and smile about it?

You got few facts and you imagined few facts.
Let me give you sequence of events.

6AM - FL is fking a dude
11AM - FL is marrying another dude
11PM - FL is trying to fk a dude who is not her husband

next day
11PM - FL actually shoves her tongue down another dude, husband catches her.
11.05PM - Fl tells her husband, she will keep fking another dude while being married to him since he wants the shares and also wants her fk buddy
11.10PM - husband pissed, slaps her and she breaks his leg.

Where does the husband force himself on this cheating kunt?
There is only one thing happening, the cheating kunt of the FL forced herself into the marriage to a poor cucked sod while having no shame fking another man.
A perfect definition of a wh0re. Even a child when you describe what this woman did can say this is a pathetic kunt and wh0re.

I don't disagree with your first para. Except you forgot to add one very important part. The husband if even lays a finger is a rapist - true. the woman who married the man without telling this 'no sex' is a horrible cheating kunt. You can't just say, it's perfectly ok for woman to not tell a man about 'no sex' policy before marrying him!!

it's the other way around. When you agree to marry, it means, you are agreeing to basic agreements that a marriage comes with, unless there is an explicit contract signed. Did FL and her husband sign an explicit contract which I missed?
This is the most brain dead logic I am reading. Who in their right mind would enter a marriage thinking 'no sex is perfectly fine with me'!!

Regarding conscription, show me where MEN MADE THE RULES?
Show me a poll conducted anywhere in any country which asked men if they are ok to be conscripted and then based on the poll conscription happened.
Some men and women made the rules which 99.999% men never agreed to and never had a say.
You are either unaware or pretending NOT TO KNOW, for most part of human history, neither men, nor women had any power. It was very few men and very few women who had power and wealth.
FFS, most men and women could not vote until the start of 20th century. In fact most men and women were not free as people until the end of WW2.
Forget power, voting happened in very few countries prior to WW2. And even in this instance for most of the time, not all men could vote either.
You really need to brush up your history.

I am not angry at conscription laws. I am only pointing at the deception of society as whole when it comes to how it treats men as disposable. I did not bring up the broader narrative until you made the point.

Traditional men are the best thing to ever have happened to women.
Look at these dramas you are watching. The best man, the greenest one is a traditionalist who is a pure virgin and loved only one woman in his life.
Modern rich handsome men would have fked hundreds before ending up marrying a feminist who herself would have fked hundrds of men.

It's funny how you talk down on traditional men, when these dramas themselves wants traditional men who open doors for women, respect them, do the right things and man up.

The non-traditional are the ones who are ok with men dressed as women entering women's bathrooms and shoving their erect penis in women;s faces.

You seem to misunderstand something about me.
I am a very realist.
I see the world and I see a place where the most horrible people in society are 99.9999% men and .00001% women.
That's why I balk when I see Kdrama FL's getting piss drunk and passing out in random places. You know the danger in these kinds of scenarios.
I balk about how casual Kdramas are about violence against men. It's not because I am against men getting beaten up by women. It's because it sends a message to most women that beating up men does not have consequences. In real life the consequences can be devastating.

My default setting for any women is to be absolutely weary of all men except the very few you trust with your life. Be smart, be safe and be weary.

one of those dramas where I was all for ML to be institutionalized, not just for his own well-being but also for the well-being of his family and FL.

Just like those morning kisses you see in these dramas..
Try having those morning kisses and you would be puking in each other's mouths.

Some people here are fraudulently stating that FL and her husband had a business marriage.
NO, they did not have a business marriage. They had an arranged marriage, which is infinitely different from a business marriage.

https://seoullawgroup.com/marriage-contract-in-korea/

A business/contract marriage is one where both parties before the marriage come to an agreement as how the marriage and if inevitable, a divorce would proceed. This is standard practice not just in Korea but in most western nations. This is documented and signed by both partied and in this case it would have been the FL and her husband.
This drama does not show FL and her husband signing any agreement to that affect.

So, all they had was a normal marriage with normal expectations, obligations and responsibilities, even legal ones.

What this means is, if the wife on the day of marriage says 'no sex' to her husband and forces a divorce, the poor sod would part with up to 70% of his wealth to his newly wed wife refusing sex.

Now in this drama, even if the husband divorces the wife, he is pretty much fked.
He does not have business/contract to fall back on and the FL is known to be a sucker for money and power.

So, some of the members were pulling crap out of their posterior when they said this was a business marriage when it clearly was an arranged one.
And they are still pulling things out of their posterior to justify the kunt of a FL who has been a horrible wench not just to the person who loved her but also to the person who married her.

so, a man gets married and as part of his marriage, expecting sex makes him a rapist..

thanks for setting it straight.

And, just remind me which scenes in the drama shows FL telling her husband prior to the marriage that it's a deal and there wont be sex?
tell us.

by default if one is getting married they assume the responsibilities that comes with it.
You don't discuss defaults, you discuss EXCEPTIONS.
not having sex is an exception, wanting to suck other men's things is an exception. If FL wanted these as part of her marriage deal, she should have discussed this BEFORE the marriage.

there are horrible men in this world as well as horrible women.
the FL in this one is a horrible kunt and a borderline wh0re.

regarding war and conscription, WTF are you again talking about?
Men DID NOT make these rules. Few Men and Women made these rules for most of the men.
Most men 99.999% of men for all history had no rights, dont confuse few men having power to all men having it.
History and even today dragged men to their deaths without their agreement.
just go and watch videos of men being dragged to their deaths in Ukraine.
lol @ feminists wanting equality. Most ukranian women have run away. Men jailed and foced to fight.
the women had a choice and except few brave ones, all ran away.
men on the other hand had no option.

just asking, women who divorce men, get their hard earned wealth as part of it, are they wh0res? Afterall by your logic, sex is not an entitlement and expecting sex makes men rapists.
So, expecting weath out of marriage makes women what?
I think they are entitled wealth as part of divorce but your logic makes these women wh0res...

the right to fight is not the same as being conscripted and forced into war.
when men have the same right as woman where they can choose or not to fight, then your point has a leg to stand on.
Until then, it reeks of disgusting hypocrisy when in Ukraine it's only men who are conscripted and most deaths on frontlines are men.

grow up.

denying sex is cruelty is law in most countries. You can scream all you want but it is enshrined in law as base for divorce and is explicitly called 'cruelty'.
You should not saying 'get divorce'.
Instead you should be saying, don't get married if you don't want to have sex.
No one in this world is forcing you to marry some one. it's your choice. When it;s your choice, stop being cruel to your spouse.

No one is entitled for sex. sure but marriage entitles expectation of sex. It's like a man saying, we are married but I am not entitled to provide you food, shelter, security etc...and if you get pregnant, you and our kid is NOT my responsibility.
is the man entitled to do all these things? In my opinion, he MUST.
as per you. even though he is expected to do, he does not need to do and he is still a good decent man..

What a fked up logic!!

Bro, are you even watching the drama?
No one informed the husband that she was fking another man the morning of their marriage and it's purely a business marriage with zero sex and affection.
Unless I missed something, bro, show me the scenes where the husband was informed of all these stipulations?

Oh dear, the FL does not suck.
She is a filthy kunt.
The whole she 'sucks' and is a poor thing who wants revenge, business marriage etc etc are being used to downplay the filthy kunt of a FL in the drama.

Like I said, if this man that man would be trashed even worse than what I am doing now.

let me know which part of what is shown in the drama makes the husband as toxic?

Cool, someone forgot to say all this to the ONE PERSON THAT NEEDS TO KNOW...

The husband.

He should have known about all of this.

The disgusting FL, her even more disgusting family and the villainous heinous uncle of the husband all knew FL was sucking another man dry even on the morning of the marriage.
They all lied to the poor sod who was under the impression he was actually getting married, rather than being cucked.

Again, reverse the gender and imagine if this an innocent girl who was lied to and got married to a b@stard who was shagging another women the morning and evening of the marriage.
And everyone knew except the poor girl knew that this man was a b@stard for a long time and still lied to get the girl married..

Don't make excuses for the dirty, foul, filthy kunt of the FL.
The more people try to make excuses for this wench, the worse the truth of her action come across as.

I am not abusing women. You are a liar and in these matters it's to disgusting to lie since it paints me as something I am not.

I am only abusing the FL.
Imagine this was a man instead of FL, who was fking another woman on the morning of his marriage to another innocent woman. Then deny any affection or normalcy to his newly wed wife, proceeds to cheat with his lover on his newly wed wife, I would calling that man a b@stard and an Asshole as well.
I am DAMN SURE you would be abusing such a despicable b@stard as well.

This FL in this drama is that despicable.

The fact that so many downplay, including you, what this kunt has done and want to hide behind the identity of woman is even more despicable.

you use the words like 'suck'.
No, this FL is a cheating kunt who for her own desires screwed one man and completely destroyed the man she married.
Like I said, if it were a man doing exactly the same thing FL has done, the tone and discussion about that man would be a worse than what I am calling the FL.

'everyone is taking issue at you abusing FL'.
These dramas have FL's abusing the ML in much filthier language. Stop playing holier than though when discussing dramas where the ML gets abused with words like Asshole, bastard etc etc in most dramas by the FL.

Don't complain about amnesia until you have watched 'Young Lady and Gentleman'. The ML in that one had triple amnesia and few other conditions that don't exist.

Husband caught the cheating hoe, confronted her. she probably gave him the finger and reaffirmed that she would keep sucking the other guy dry while blue balling the husband.

the slap from him and the kick from her followed.

WTF are you talking about.
Most modern countries have special rights for women.

If you got any doubts look at Ukraine, only men are being dragged to fight and die against their wishes. Women are not touched.

Denying sex is extreme cruelty.
Your logic is very similar to a rapist saying, fking wife against her wishes is not a crime.
It is a crime and on flip side denying sex is cruelty.

No one is entitled to sex but marriage comes with expectation of sex, unless before the marriage there is a contract for NO SEX.
Otherwise, you are entitled to have expectation of sex. It's not just the law but also social norm.

Look, if a kunt does not want to have sex, don't marry. Why marry and destroy the man?

Sure, the husband can dump the kunt and marry someone else. But, the woman who is denying sex is kunt. Both are true.

Finally, your last point is right.
This is usually discussed BEFORE MARRIAGE.
NOT dump on your husband AFTER MARRIAGE.

More importantly, in this case, this kunt of FL is happily fking another man, even the morning of her marriage. So, we are not talking about this case.

It's astounding to see people justifying that getting married and telling the husband that there won't be any sex is OK since the FL is a cheating KUNT.

Funnily there are kdramas where the exact same thing happens and the dramas justify public humiliation of husbands who cheated because the wife was not putting out.

Yes, even in scenario 3 the husband can get a divorce, where did I ever say he should not or cannot?

I was pointing to the fact any woman who marries and after that informs her husband she won't ever have sex & is fking another man is a KUNT.

And then I keep pointing to the fact that SEX IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF MARRIAGE.
The strange thing here is even in dating you lot are ok with sexual acts but because the FL is a cheap KUNT, you support no sex even in marriage..

Do you lot even know the meaning of word marriage and meaning of vows you take during marriage?

You know what, people can get married for any number of reasons. And if sex is not supposed to be part of it, you discuss it with your partner BEFORE MARRIAGE, not AFTER MARRIAGE.

You lot seem to intentionally pretend to be brain dead for some reason. I said even in my posts even if newly married couples have no sex it's still fine as long this was discussed before marriage.

And I repeatedly mentioned a specific scenario where the FL in this a cheating KUNT, who fked another man the night before the marriage and then goes about not having sex with her new husband.

THAT is the scenario I am talking about.

Yeah, husband can get divorce from this cruel KUNT anytime...but that still does not hide the fact that woman like these collosal KUNT's

sometimes you get a nice one.

in reality, most guys, especially if they are single, and especially if they are as good looking, rich and successful as Kdrama ML's would have shagged hundreds of women by the time they reach 20.

You seem to think just because a man is in love with a woman he won't have sex with other women.
men don't even need to like anything about a woman to have sex. They will just have it because they are horny and at young age, they will shag any woman who is willing.

If you think men are like Kdrama ML's who are aloof and don't look at women lustily, you are living in some other universe.

if any of you think there are men who are different and are like Kdrama ML's, let me bust your bubble.
All men are horn dogs. Unless they are tied in a relationship, they will fk any woman who is willing.

Another Kdrama romcom that has gone to shitters by the usual Kdrama tropes.
This one had potential but as drama progressed, the tropes are reaffirmed and reconfirmed multiple times.

It's just cringe to watch this shit as an adult.

Let's get to ML and FL characters..

ML is confirmed pure virgin who never looked at any woman except the FL. he loved her as young boy and then as adult even he did not know her identity. Basically the drama confirms ML's purity by showing us that his pecker only moved for the FL in his life.
This man never wanked, never for a moment had another woman in his mind.

The FL on the hand has no compulsions, she is now going on dates.

It's just the same crappy pure virgin ML and the same Fl who has options when it comes to men.

These characters can't seriously be written by adults at this point.
Which adults writes these same cringy ML and FL in each and every drama?!!