ella

Thank you for the analysis and insight. Disregarding Mhoks issues, and his character, cheapened the show. In the later episodes I could not buy into this relationship. Too much one sided fawning over Day.

They made it like Mohk is ugly, uncharismatic, or so lacking that he should be grateful that he has Day. Its not like Day is a 10/10 and Mohk is a desperate 4/10..

It left me wondering what Mhok saw in Day - when his needs were not being met. Mhok is running around buying Day presents, giving 100% of himself but what does Day give back. It felt too much one sided. Day has a playmate that gives him affection.

I understand why Mohks psychology, experiences and trauma would make him get involved - but that is not what I am discussing here. As the show progressed, the characters became more superficial.

I appreciate your point (good points that made me think) but don't get your argument. Sexual content can have a narrative value. What has narrative value can also be subjective.

But irrespective we are willing to watch "moral failings" like violence but not something that titillates - for that we add an age restriction. I avoid violence /brutality in films for my mental hygiene (irrespective of the narrative), I am not negatively affected by films showing toxicity in relationships, unhappy endings, sexual content or nudity (i dont watch porn -that is a diff category).

I dont see the problem with "sexual" content inserted to titillate.

Disagree - im loving it and already rewatched it. Finding it so cute. Also loved Mike pettiness in latest episode. Loving the comedy.

Funny how people pay to see murder, bulling, violence but avoid sex like its the biggest sin out.

They used to be exciting and different. But now the same tropes - the amnesia, the meeting of leads in childhood, the evil mother in law, the love triangle... and its the same plots, Sometimes the first few episodes are good but it goes downhill midway and I am bored.

Korean dramas are becoming like the western dramas I got bored off.

Sometimes I come across something good (Mr Plankton, Secret Garden, etc) but for the most part they are becoming repetitive.

Thank you - you have expressed my thoughts exactly.
I dont want to be unkind towards a celebrity who has been harassed unfairly on many other issues (when I dont know the truth). But I feel for this victim who is powerless to get any justice if the allegations are true.

I would not bother watching this. It is not completed.

I enjoyed the concept, the actors etc but left unfinished.

I loved green flag Jay so was not expecting that twist and pettiness in episode 4. The show just got more fun and interesting with Jimmy coming into the picture.

Its getting so good that I regret starting the show before all the episodes are aired.

If there is money to be made it will be released internationally by somebody -its a matter of negotiation.

I dont know how Gaga does not know what is happening / being produced in the industry. This is a potential "product" so I dont buy that they are that clueless. (they may not have been approached )

I work as an analyst (in non media industry) and we keep tabs on what is happening in the industry and market, and what competitors are doing.

I think they are still negotiating with various parties re international distribution rights. I imagine that is why they cant say much.

You are right. It is fun. So glad I read your post and I am watching it ( on episode 5,).

It does deserve higher rating - but I think most viewers want more action or boring "good" characters. They vote on the morals of the characters.
Me - I like the dialogue and game playing and cheating, and imperfect characters. Also like that it has adults rather than high school kids.

The profile photo does not do him justice - its so different with how he appears in shows. Watching Cherry Magic, I see a good looking actor on screen - and I go to find out who the actor is - and I am surprised its Mark. He looks so much better than this photo. Same with Star & Sky.

Really like the couple but disappointed with this show. Enjoyed the first 4 /5 episodes but then it got boring. Did not dislike the GL part but found it not appropriate or necessary for this story. And they dragged it out.

To be fair i enjoy the "being enemies" part more - find the interaction more amusing and interesting than when its just lovers being nice (and boring) each other. I find shows like My Stand-in so much more interesting with more dimensions.

lol its pathetic from both sides. Its become an unhealthy obsession for a lot.

I commented initially (against KSH) but now it serves no purpose to go over the same points. And in the end, it does not matter how much you comment here - it wont make a difference except affect peoples mental health and waste their time.

I am excited to see one of the actors from "Every You, Every me (Director's Cut)" on this show.

I have just finished Every You, Every me (so underrated) which had a concept that was so different from other dramas. I enjoyed the production, and performance by Top Piyawat /Mick - so I eagerly waiting .

I feel this drama is underrated. It deserves more recognition. I enjoyed the concept as it is so different from other typical stories. Also the leads are so good looking. Would like to see more from the actors.

I found this production quality way above the average Thai BL drama. I am glad I watched this.

This show is so cute. Puppy dog in love lead, Moo is adorable.

It is worth watching . I was going to drop this but am so glad I saw it through. It is a well produced quality show. (there are a lot of others that look cheap and amateurish - still like some of them). This drama and "Every You, Every me" are overlooked.

Because I value facts and the truth. And I am ethical enough to stick to both.

He groomed her, he abused her psychologically and physically. She committed suicide on his birthday. Is that not enough that you need to create false statements and be dogmatic in your stand to misrepresent the truth . ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia).

I dont need to resort to KSH tactics and lies to win the fight - do you?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

I value the truth and facts.

And if you need resort to calling people "names" just to get them, then you are no better then the bullies who went after every celebrity with lies. But its something KSH is doing in his arguments and you are no better. You are resorting to his tactics.

Call him what you want. Its a bad reflection on your (lack) of character and values.

A paedophile has a very precise definition (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia).


Is calling me self-righteous the best you can do to hide your lack of ethics lies. Or do you not think that their is a solid case against KSH that you have to resort to hyperbole.

He groomed a teenager, she committed suicide on his birthday, he abused her psychologically, destroyed her future - does all those facts mean nothing to you so you have to resort to lies and name calling. Call me honey, and I am calling you a fool. And unethical one as well.