ella

Thank you - you have expressed my thoughts exactly.
I dont want to be unkind towards a celebrity who has been harassed unfairly on many other issues (when I dont know the truth). But I feel for this victim who is powerless to get any justice if the allegations are true.

I would not bother watching this. It is not completed.

I enjoyed the concept, the actors etc but left unfinished.

I loved green flag Jay so was not expecting that twist and pettiness in episode 4. The show just got more fun and interesting with Jimmy coming into the picture.

Its getting so good that I regret starting the show before all the episodes are aired.

If there is money to be made it will be released internationally by somebody -its a matter of negotiation.

I dont know how Gaga does not know what is happening / being produced in the industry. This is a potential "product" so I dont buy that they are that clueless. (they may not have been approached )

I work as an analyst (in non media industry) and we keep tabs on what is happening in the industry and market, and what competitors are doing.

I think they are still negotiating with various parties re international distribution rights. I imagine that is why they cant say much.

You are right. It is fun. So glad I read your post and I am watching it ( on episode 5,).

It does deserve higher rating - but I think most viewers want more action or boring "good" characters. They vote on the morals of the characters.
Me - I like the dialogue and game playing and cheating, and imperfect characters. Also like that it has adults rather than high school kids.

The profile photo does not do him justice - its so different with how he appears in shows. Watching Cherry Magic, I see a good looking actor on screen - and I go to find out who the actor is - and I am surprised its Mark. He looks so much better than this photo. Same with Star & Sky.

Really like the couple but disappointed with this show. Enjoyed the first 4 /5 episodes but then it got boring. Did not dislike the GL part but found it not appropriate or necessary for this story. And they dragged it out.

To be fair i enjoy the "being enemies" part more - find the interaction more amusing and interesting than when its just lovers being nice (and boring) each other. I find shows like My Stand-in so much more interesting with more dimensions.

lol its pathetic from both sides. Its become an unhealthy obsession for a lot.

I commented initially (against KSH) but now it serves no purpose to go over the same points. And in the end, it does not matter how much you comment here - it wont make a difference except affect peoples mental health and waste their time.

I am excited to see one of the actors from "Every You, Every me (Director's Cut)" on this show.

I have just finished Every You, Every me (so underrated) which had a concept that was so different from other dramas. I enjoyed the production, and performance by Top Piyawat /Mick - so I eagerly waiting .

I feel this drama is underrated. It deserves more recognition. I enjoyed the concept as it is so different from other typical stories. Also the leads are so good looking. Would like to see more from the actors.

I found this production quality way above the average Thai BL drama. I am glad I watched this.

This show is so cute. Puppy dog in love lead, Moo is adorable.

It is worth watching . I was going to drop this but am so glad I saw it through. It is a well produced quality show. (there are a lot of others that look cheap and amateurish - still like some of them). This drama and "Every You, Every me" are overlooked.

Because I value facts and the truth. And I am ethical enough to stick to both.

He groomed her, he abused her psychologically and physically. She committed suicide on his birthday. Is that not enough that you need to create false statements and be dogmatic in your stand to misrepresent the truth . ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia).

I dont need to resort to KSH tactics and lies to win the fight - do you?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

I value the truth and facts.

And if you need resort to calling people "names" just to get them, then you are no better then the bullies who went after every celebrity with lies. But its something KSH is doing in his arguments and you are no better. You are resorting to his tactics.

Call him what you want. Its a bad reflection on your (lack) of character and values.

A paedophile has a very precise definition (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia).


Is calling me self-righteous the best you can do to hide your lack of ethics lies. Or do you not think that their is a solid case against KSH that you have to resort to hyperbole.

He groomed a teenager, she committed suicide on his birthday, he abused her psychologically, destroyed her future - does all those facts mean nothing to you so you have to resort to lies and name calling. Call me honey, and I am calling you a fool. And unethical one as well.

I used to call him a paedophile until I was corrected by someone here.
He is most certainly interested in younger girls, in taking advantage of their naivete. He is a groomer.

However, I will however refrain from labelling him a paedophile because legally and clinically its not the correct definition. If I use hyperbole and lies to try and prove my argument and opens my up to misrepresentation of the facts. It makes me as dishonest as KSH and his agency Gold Medalist.

Precision is crucial in law and other areas to ensures that arguments and legal documents are clear and unambiguous, leaving no room for misinterpretation.

But hey, you do you and use hyperbole because you obviously don't think the truth is bad enough to judge him. I think the facts are enough without resorting to hyperbole.

Respect to anyone who quotes Desmond Tutu. I never paid much attention to him when I was younger and living in South Africa.

But as I grew older and paid more attention to politics, I admired and respected him for speaking out against any injustice even if it was unpopular at that time. eg opposition to the Iraq War, and Israel's treatment of Palestinians as apartheid etc.
He was a fearless and a great man.

Thank you. I also appreciate the exchange, and grateful that you took the time to educate me and to make me think about being less judgemental and kinder.

Sorry - I was wrong in making such an accusation.

I have looked at some videos about him on you tube because I didn't know anything about this person apart from the wiki page. (What I know about his is based on others opinion and what I heard from videos so it may not be true. ). I like what he is about, and what he stands for - a refreshing change from other Korean actors. (lol - so I am favourably biased now)

I do have empathy for him, and am aware unfairly he has been treated by the media, the public and judicial system for what are basically victimless crimes.

I wish they would prosecute those who make false allegations of rape - and make it clear when its a false allegation. I tend to usually support the victims because I know how impossible it is to prosecute rape.

I don't know either way of guilt or innocent -but he deserves the benefit of the doubt based on the limited information.

I have been using the term paedophile to describe him but you are 100% correct re the official definition of paedophile. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia)
The correct term would be "Ephebophilia "

I will use groomer instead of paedophile.