ella

How does he still have 20.2mill followers. (pedo followers?)

thank you

Even a legal professional cant answer the question on what basis Prada terminated the contract unless they look at the specific contract clauses / details.

Unless you have privy to the contracts and have insider information/ or you are a legal expert dealing with the contracts then don't pretend to be an authority on the legal positon. Stick to the facts you know.

People should not parade as legal / medical / tax experts unless they have that background - and are familiar with case/facts.

There is enough bullying and misinformation from so called "experts".
Not disputing the fact that he groomed her at 15 yrs or that he sent her demand notices, or that GM has been caught being dishonest. Those are facts.

But stop giving "expert" opinions when its personal opinions.

Exactly.


That is why I am wondering what laws he actually broke when it was legal to have sex with someone over 13. Otherwise the police would be on involved now. (I read that is why her family cant press charges or go after him as easily)

Grooming is a subjective definition - based on our values.

If a child is over 13yrs old it would not be considered grooming in the eyes of the law before 2020.

If you are arguing that what he did was illegal then why are the police not involved?
Why cant the family press charges.
You know why. His actions of grooming and having sex with a minor over 13 were totally legal prior to 2020.

Grooming is a subjective definition. If a child is over 13yrs old it would not be considered grooming before new law was passed in 2020.

We would call it grooming, the law would call it legal prior to 2020

Its all very well quoting current law but you missed the point.

Actually the law was changed in 2020 I believe. Before that the age of consent was 13. So the grooming was very much legal. Otherwise the family would sue him directly and the police would be involved.

Serious legal question. I wonder if there was a morality clause for the Disney production.
Still I do hope Disney loses money as well. They are known for exploiting child actors and sexual for abuse of minors. They have also hired child molesters ( Brian Peck, Bryan Singer) and protecting them.

Would they be able to get damages? KSH did not break any legal laws - and from my understanding grooming of a 15 year old minor was allowed under Korean Law, and sending letters of demand for payment outstanding is not illegal). Would he be subject to Korean or international /US law.

I wonder if the terms are well defined, or broad regarding scandals and violations of ethics.
Brands are terminating relationships. How do they argue "morals or ethics" when he played by the legal rules.

His mistakes were the lies after revelations came out (he could have apologised) and handling of the situation with KSR (showed some compassion re debt etc). Otherwise he would have gotten away with it and society would not have blinked.

It sucks how many do get away with it.

We dont know if she was married. Is this confirmed?

So he is admitting that he is the man in the picture - the adult man that groomed a child.

The fact that a lot of companies (Prada included) are dropping him says a lot. They would have consulted their legal and PR teams. They are not associating with someone who is a groomer and who lacks morals. (not that companies really they care about morals - but they care about public perception and their brand.

lol Lesbians /homosexuals can also be paedophiles. What is your point?

Nothing changes the fact that KSR (chose) committed suicide on KSH birthday, and that he (an adult nearing 30) pursued and groomed her when she was 15yrs old. She was exploited and abused.

But her parents need to address the recent allegations that she was married/abortion - or at least issue a statement that due to legal proceedings they cant discuss anything further.

They started on this path of transparency and exposing the truth - so they need to address any uncomfortable rumours

It could be a distraction but they should address it either way. The family are fighting for the truth and for transparency. Thus they should be transparent with the facts - favourable or unfavourable.

They should continue to file the defamation complaints.

As I said the fact that she may have married/aborted is irrelevant to the fact that there was grooming and exploitation and defamation.

Have her parents addressed the recent allegations that she was married/abortion. Are they going to address this. I do think that they should set the record straight (because they started on this path of transparency and exposing the truth).

The above does not change the fact that she (chose) committed suicide on KSH birthday, and that he (an adult nearing 30) pursued and groomed her when she was 15yrs old - and exploited and abused her . That exploitation/abuse ended with her death.

I think her trauma with KSH negatively affected her life decisions going forward.

I agree that it does not change the fact that she was groomed and exploited by KSH. And that his agency exploited, and financially/legally threatened her, and most importantly that she committed suicide on his birthday.

I'm sure her life decisions were influenced by her KSH trauma . Her DUI, her future relationships etc.

However it could influence public perception and his team will use it do distract. If she had not died on his birthday it could more easily be spun that her current relationship/issues were the problem.

thanks for this info.

I agree - its just as prevalent in other countries (and it could be worse). However I was only focusing on the KDrama industry as discussion is about this powerful evil individual.

There is a lot of South Koreans on this list. What is wrong with the men in S Korea?

I also think she was suffering and hurting from a broken heart. He was her first partner and six yrs is a long time. He manipulated her, used and abused her and then discarded her. But even after discarding her he still wanted to control her.
He was unbelievably cruel.