"La pédophilie est une paraphilie caractérisée par l'attirance sexuelle ou par des sentiments amoureux persistants…
Her parents approval and behaviour are irrelevant. It does not matter if her parents were good parents or bad parents. If they loved her or not.
What is relevant is that a 28 yr old man was grooming a minor who was 15 yrs old.
Essentially you are arguing that if you come from a broken home, then you deserve to be a victim of crime. Or that children born in poor family households deserve to be exploited. Your argument is pathetic. And I am tired of this type of reasoning.
Also tired of the argument that her parents did nothing when she was alive. If someone injures me that it may not be worth my while to pursue any action as the damage is not significant enough. If later I find out that I have more serious injuries and its more costly then I have every right to pursue legal action.
There was no point in going after him when she was alive. He did not break any legal law by grooming her. When she committed suicide they become aware of the damage done to her and they want to address the issues. They may also be acting now to honour their daughter and what she experienced because they regret not being aware or feeling they had not done enough to protect her. These are valid reasons to pursue action.
But dont forget. What is relevant is that a 28 yr old man was grooming a minor who was 15 yrs old.
Drugs are not a problem - the big problem is the rape accusation. Lack of sufficient evidence does not mean he…
If he is innocent then I do feel sorry for him and what he has to go through. And the bullying by the public makes it even worse.
I based my opinion of three points re the prosecution rape cases/drug use . I dont have any bias re drug use (I have indulged) / homosexuality (have friends).
ONE. Lack of evidence does not prove innocence. It means you were not found guilty because there is not enough evidence. The police deciding to not send it to the prosecutor does not mean that he is innocent. It means there is lack of sufficient proof to get a conviction. (And even with a lot of proof it is still likely that most rapists get away with it. How many rapists have argued that she wanted it as she was wearing a short skirt. ). It is scary how low the conviction rate is for rape. That is the reason why so few are sent to prosecutor and even fewer get a conviction.
TWO. Very few victims make false allegations about rape (this is a statistical fact). Its not a pleasant experience for the victim because it is a crime hard to prove and its humiliating. Its even harder for men to come forward.
THREE. In a situation where drugs are involved, its very likely that certain boundaries can be crossed very easily. It is highly likely that there may not have been consent. It is highly likely that there are no reliable witnesses for obvious reasons (they were also high or don't want to implicate themselves).
You are a fan and emotionally invested. There are fans defending KSH and not believing he groomed a 15 yr minor (which I understand is not illegal in SKorea before 2020). You would argue that he did not do it.
He could've said the last line to stay away from defamation, right?
He answered honestly. He is not a psychologist/medical expert who counselled her and is in a position to give an opinion about her mental state/causes. It makes him more credible I think.
Edit: She died on his KSH birthday which is her testimony to what affected her. Now that is fact.
Drugs are not a problem - the big problem is the rape accusation. Lack of sufficient evidence does not mean he…
As per Wikipedia there was evidence of sexual assault but not enough to prosecute. Were you there? If you have FACTS then go and change the wiki page to that he is 100% innocent and the victim lied. Otherwise you are talking cr@p and full of bias
Drugs are not a problem - the big problem is the rape accusation. Lack of sufficient evidence does not mean he…
Objectively speaking it does not mean he is innocent either. They found evidence but not enough to proceed with criminal charges. Stop showing your bias and focus on the facts.
Drugs are not a problem - the big problem is the rape accusation. Lack of sufficient evidence does not mean he…
Its discussed on his wikipedia page : Sexual assault-related investigations and results.
He was cleared due to lack of evidence (not because he didnt do it). Its extremely difficult to prove rape or to prosecute. About 1% of reported rape lead to conviction here in England. I imagine male rape would be even less (and fewer would be reported).
This is more serious that an ex saying some bad things about him. I think there is fire with this smoke.
I have never heard of this actor before, but googled him to find out why Netflix delayed the release.
Netflix deserves some blame too. They're cowards and they also decided not to distribute movie The Match because…
Really. He was accused of rape - but charges dropped due to lack of evidence. Its a big deal if its true even if there is not enough evidence to proceed with criminal charges.
now why are you generalising 💀 as someone from hk, me and my family, my friends, etc all despise him for what…
Curious - does public opinion in HK support him. Generally speaking. Are brands still backing him in HK?
Here in the UK there have been very few articles but not much attention has been given to this. I dont think S Korean artists are such a big deal here or talked about generally speaking.
I do have a feeling that there would be disapproval of the age gap and the fact that she was a minor if this reported here (and people cared about Korean actors).
Apparently genocide, and paedophilia are not as evil as being antisemitic.You become anti semitic the moment you…
I did not say that genocide was less evil at ALL.
Its not about being Jewish. I have a problem with anyone who supports ANY genocide whatever their race/nationality/ethnicity. And manipulating the narrative.
Not all Jewish people support this genocide. Huge respect for those who speak out against the atrocities. Actually there are a lot of right wing christians support this genocide.
My last attempt to respond to the evidence question was to explain that Prada—using one example—can cancel…
Even a legal professional cant answer the question on what basis Prada terminated the contract unless they look at the specific contract clauses / details.
Unless you have privy to the contracts and have insider information/ or you are a legal expert dealing with the contracts then don't pretend to be an authority on the legal positon. Stick to the facts you know.
People should not parade as legal / medical / tax experts unless they have that background - and are familiar with case/facts.
There is enough bullying and misinformation from so called "experts". Not disputing the fact that he groomed her at 15 yrs or that he sent her demand notices, or that GM has been caught being dishonest. Those are facts.
But stop giving "expert" opinions when its personal opinions.
That is why I am wondering what laws he actually broke when it was legal to have sex with someone over 13. Otherwise the police would be on involved now. (I read that is why her family cant press charges or go after him as easily)
Grooming is a subjective definition - based on our values.
If a child is over 13yrs old it would not be considered grooming in the eyes of the law before 2020.
If you are arguing that what he did was illegal then why are the police not involved? Why cant the family press charges. You know why. His actions of grooming and having sex with a minor over 13 were totally legal prior to 2020.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia
What is relevant is that a 28 yr old man was grooming a minor who was 15 yrs old.
Essentially you are arguing that if you come from a broken home, then you deserve to be a victim of crime. Or that children born in poor family households deserve to be exploited. Your argument is pathetic. And I am tired of this type of reasoning.
Also tired of the argument that her parents did nothing when she was alive. If someone injures me that it may not be worth my while to pursue any action as the damage is not significant enough. If later I find out that I have more serious injuries and its more costly then I have every right to pursue legal action.
There was no point in going after him when she was alive. He did not break any legal law by grooming her. When she committed suicide they become aware of the damage done to her and they want to address the issues. They may also be acting now to honour their daughter and what she experienced because they regret not being aware or feeling they had not done enough to protect her. These are valid reasons to pursue action.
But dont forget. What is relevant is that a 28 yr old man was grooming a minor who was 15 yrs old.
I based my opinion of three points re the prosecution rape cases/drug use . I dont have any bias re drug use (I have indulged) / homosexuality (have friends).
ONE. Lack of evidence does not prove innocence. It means you were not found guilty because there is not enough evidence. The police deciding to not send it to the prosecutor does not mean that he is innocent. It means there is lack of sufficient proof to get a conviction. (And even with a lot of proof it is still likely that most rapists get away with it. How many rapists have argued that she wanted it as she was wearing a short skirt. ). It is scary how low the conviction rate is for rape. That is the reason why so few are sent to prosecutor and even fewer get a conviction.
TWO. Very few victims make false allegations about rape (this is a statistical fact). Its not a pleasant experience for the victim because it is a crime hard to prove and its humiliating. Its even harder for men to come forward.
THREE. In a situation where drugs are involved, its very likely that certain boundaries can be crossed very easily. It is highly likely that there may not have been consent. It is highly likely that there are no reliable witnesses for obvious reasons (they were also high or don't want to implicate themselves).
You are a fan and emotionally invested. There are fans defending KSH and not believing he groomed a 15 yr minor (which I understand is not illegal in SKorea before 2020). You would argue that he did not do it.
I dont know if he is guilty or innocent.
Edit: She died on his KSH birthday which is her testimony to what affected her. Now that is fact.
He was cleared due to lack of evidence (not because he didnt do it). Its extremely difficult to prove rape or to prosecute. About 1% of reported rape lead to conviction here in England. I imagine male rape would be even less (and fewer would be reported).
This is more serious that an ex saying some bad things about him. I think there is fire with this smoke.
I have never heard of this actor before, but googled him to find out why Netflix delayed the release.
Here in the UK there have been very few articles but not much attention has been given to this. I dont think S Korean artists are such a big deal here or talked about generally speaking.
I do have a feeling that there would be disapproval of the age gap and the fact that she was a minor if this reported here (and people cared about Korean actors).
Its not about being Jewish. I have a problem with anyone who supports ANY genocide whatever their race/nationality/ethnicity. And manipulating the narrative.
Not all Jewish people support this genocide. Huge respect for those who speak out against the atrocities. Actually there are a lot of right wing christians support this genocide.
You become anti semitic the moment you point out the apartheid, genocide of Palestinians, the concentration camps they have set up etc.
Unless you have privy to the contracts and have insider information/ or you are a legal expert dealing with the contracts then don't pretend to be an authority on the legal positon. Stick to the facts you know.
People should not parade as legal / medical / tax experts unless they have that background - and are familiar with case/facts.
There is enough bullying and misinformation from so called "experts".
Not disputing the fact that he groomed her at 15 yrs or that he sent her demand notices, or that GM has been caught being dishonest. Those are facts.
But stop giving "expert" opinions when its personal opinions.
That is why I am wondering what laws he actually broke when it was legal to have sex with someone over 13. Otherwise the police would be on involved now. (I read that is why her family cant press charges or go after him as easily)
If a child is over 13yrs old it would not be considered grooming in the eyes of the law before 2020.
If you are arguing that what he did was illegal then why are the police not involved?
Why cant the family press charges.
You know why. His actions of grooming and having sex with a minor over 13 were totally legal prior to 2020.