I hate it when adults do something really hurtful to a child, and when they realize their fault, rather than apologize, they just pretend like everything is good. Miho deserved an apology from Nam-mo's mom. She didn't need to kneel of beg, just a simple "I'm sorry" would've sufficed.
I was really liking this in the beginning, but the fact that every single thing they ever do something goes wrong…
First of all, it's predictable, not predictive. Second, I quite like that they constantly get beaten down cos it's never just for plot. Each setback advances the story meaningfully and develops the characters. If you notice, each time they lose, a certain character or group of characters has meaningful growth in their arc. Like with Majin in Thailand.
I think there's a difference between Character Watchers and Plot Watchers. Character watchers are here for the…
So true. But I'm kinda both. I can watch a show with mediocre characters if the plot is great. and i can watch a show with a mediocre plot if the characters are great. i think the plot and characters are equally important in a show.
Ugh again female stupidity plot... when a big fire breaks out, you RUN FOR HELP!!!! you dont try to put it out…
if you had your entire livelihood burning in front of your eyes, would you just run? you'd try to save it. she didn't expect it to escalate that quickly, and when it did, she tried running. but she had to try and save it first. do you know how much those goods were worth? she wasn't being stupid. she was doing what most people would do when their extremely valuable possession are in danger .
First 4-5 episodes were good indeed, Taepoong's transformation from a spoiled brat to someone who's capable to…
Personally, i dont think he was "ignored". i think the writers are just intentional about giving each character time to shine, and naturally, that's gonna take time away from the leads. the upside is that we get a set of well-written and well-developed characters all across the board.
can someone who understands better please talk me through this. do junseo and jaeoh have lives on their own? it's like they live and breathe to serve Ah-Jin. junseo has literally been dating a girl for a whole year just to watch her and make sure she doesn't hurt Ah-Jin. Jaeoh only appears when Ah-Jin needs him to do something. the first four episodes made them seem like distinct individuals, but since then, it's like they only exist in Ah-Jin's world. like they're her foot soldiers. I get that Ah-Jin is like a drug to them and they're addicted, but dont they have anything else to do with their time???even junseo's life's work is all about Ah-Jin. Is it that I dont understand how obsession works, or are they just one dimensional now?
honestly, I never doubted Ah-Jin for a second. the writers wouldn't go that far. having her kill a poor, helpless grandma is a surefire way to get the audience to hate her. but they don't want us to hate her, they simply want is to understand Ah-Jin. And I have no understanding for people who push Grandmas to their deaths.
“You'll never make me hate a girl who's trying to survive and climb her way up after suffering and going through…
y'all know she's using women too, right? installed herself in Heo's grandma's life and manipulated her just to get close to Heo. and she will continue to use more innocent women and men.
Heck no, newer aired one I watched was Walking On Thin Ice - 12 episodes and everything wasn't fleshed out properly,…
I honestly think this is a personal take. Do you watch western shows. Lots of very popular shows span between 5-10 seasons. Sure, some are trash, but they wouldn't keep making new seasons if they weren't getting lots of viewers. Maybe you like short shows and that's okay. ive always preferred the 16 episode format, and found show with 12 episodes or less to be inadequately fleshed out.
I’ve not caught up with all the episodes yet. But I just need to gush, so here we go.(I’ve only watched till…
this is such a beautiful take. i love that the story is so character centric. it's been a really long time since I've watched a drama with such intentional character writing across the board. It's usually well written leads and shallow supporting characters, but in Typhoon Family, everyone is a main character just trying to live their own story.
I solemnly stand with the FL, but if the story with HIG is true — and I haven’t read the webtoon — and she…
she's not evil to you? have you watched episode 4 or do you just have a skewered sense of morality? you know she intentionally manipulated an innocent man into going to jail for her, right? basically destroyed his life. she doesn't care who she has to hurt to get what she wants and she'll continue to hurt more innocent people.
The reviews are people's personal opinions and you dont have the right to say which is true or untrue because…
i don't like the drama. in fact, I utterly detest it. but i would never say that anyone who likes it is wrong, or their opinions are untrue because when it comes to art, it's all about personal sentiment. no one is right or wrong. just different.
The reviews are people's personal opinions and you dont have the right to say which is true or untrue because…
You’re absolutely allowed to think the reviews are exaggerated — that’s your opinion, and I’m not trying to take that from you. What I’m saying is that when you claim the reviews ‘aren’t true,’ you’re no longer giving an opinion, you’re stating it as a fact. People’s personal experiences with a show can’t be called ‘untrue’ just because you disagree with them. That's not how opinions work. You even stated that the 'only truth' is your own personal opinion of the show. Truth is fact, and no one person's opinion can be considered factual, unless back by universal laws or proof. Sorry to get all extra. I'm really just trying to get point across. So yes, have your opinion — I’m only correcting the way you framed other people’s subjective opinions as objectively false.
The reviews for this drama are not true and are overexaggerated!!! The only truth was that the drama is very predictable…
The reviews are people's personal opinions and you dont have the right to say which is true or untrue because everyone receives art differently. You can have your own views without invalidating someone else's.
What I’m saying is that when you claim the reviews ‘aren’t true,’ you’re no longer giving an opinion, you’re stating it as a fact. People’s personal experiences with a show can’t be called ‘untrue’ just because you disagree with them. That's not how opinions work. You even stated that the 'only truth' is your own personal opinion of the show. Truth is fact, and no one person's opinion can be considered factual, unless back by universal laws or proof. Sorry to get all extra. I'm really just trying to get point across.
So yes, have your opinion — I’m only correcting the way you framed other people’s subjective opinions as objectively false.