Of course he is acting for money, that's his job. He will not do it for free...No seriously, why ? I'm curious…
I'm fine, I was just genuinely asking. ^^ Well, I don't understand this kind of comments (the way it's written at least). It's not a universal truth, it's just personal tastes and opinions. Ji Chang Wook chooses his projects for good reasons, his own. I don't get why people also put the blame on agencies and managers when they don't like actors choices, that doesn't make sense, especially for seasoned ones.
At this point his drama selection prove that he's acting for money.
Of course he is acting for money, that's his job. He will not do it for free... No seriously, why ? I'm curious about why you think that. Because it means that you also think he is a really despicable person who deliberately lie and deceive people, as he talked many times, in countless interviews, about his reasons for acting and choosing his projects.
I'm rewatching season 1, I prefer now than first time. There are many funny situations I didn't noticed (I was…
Season 1 was good, but I wasn't convinced by Ahn Bo Hyun acting and his character, so I enjoyed the drama more for others characters relationships and the depiction of the cells than the main romance and relationship. Now I also enjoy the romance, at least the start, so it's even better.
Just the start, but far more better than season 1 for me so far. Obviously it depends on ones preferences, and for me there is no doubt that Jin Young is much more charming and his character Ba Bi far more appealing and interesting than Woong. Can't wait for the next episodes.
The more I watch, the less it's good. First I really don't get why they decided to mixed two different love stories. There is really nothing that makes the parallel interesting, they should have done two separate series. And second, this scenario is bad, very predictable and really not original. Too bad because the actors are good, there was potential but it's just an average one finally.
I was a little bit disappointed when it started, but I'm quite happy that it keeps getting better and it made me change my ratings over the episodes. That's not often the case. The cast is very good, and I'm quite fond of the Queen Dowager character.
kinda see where you're going but this is just a fiction and anyways, there are some angles of his faces where…
Of course it's a fiction, but it doesn't mean that it shouldn't be realistic. For me he never looks like a woman. But I'm not surprised, Korean cross-dressing is no matter what almost always bad in sageuk. I only saw Japanese productions doing a good job with that.
Really ridiculous. At least there are men who are really androgynous but that's really not the case here so the cross-dressing and the fact people believe the character is a women is nothing believable.
Many sageuk added to this list should not be here but in the Historical list because they are based on Joseon kings or set during Joseon reigns. If there are real historical figures or elements in the drama, even if they are not the main characters, it belongs to the Historical list, not the period one.
I enjoyed this very much! (Genuine artistic, lovely music, kinda realistic- (don’t expect sucker punch or pans…
Actually no, in Korean the most common words people would say for magic are "수리 수리 마수리" (suri suri masuri). It's the equivalent of abracadabra. "Annarasumara" is a creation of the author of the webtoon I think, because I never saw or heard of it elsewhere.
Soo i know up there it says KBS2 Netflix but do you perhap know if it is for sure going to be on Netflix? I'm…
"up there" ? Where ? I haven't read anything about Netflix personally. It seems a domestic drama, it will aired only on KBS 2TV in August. The rights might be bought by a platform later but not for the first airing in August I think.
I watch a lot of movies, and especially a lot of Korean movies, but my personal ratings are rarely similar to the average ratings here so it don't really care about it. The same goes for dramas actually. I usually follow people's recommendations rather than ranked lists, especially when it comes to popularity, because as it is explained in the article, the way popularity is measured here is kind of stupid (in my opinion at least). And also because the "sociology" of the viewers should be taken in consideration too. If 80% of the viewers are women under 30, it's not very objectively representative. It's only relevant for this segment of the "population". Good job for the article, it's a lot of work, but I personally think these lists in general (it's the same for dramas) are useless because in the same top 10 you can have a movie rated by more than 15 000 people and one by 3 000. So the value of ratings is totally different and they shouldn't be ranked together. Ranked lists should be the result of a mix of overall ratings and percentage of viewers to be a little bit more objective.
1 
Well, I don't understand this kind of comments (the way it's written at least). It's not a universal truth, it's just personal tastes and opinions.
Ji Chang Wook chooses his projects for good reasons, his own. I don't get why people also put the blame on agencies and managers when they don't like actors choices, that doesn't make sense, especially for seasoned ones.
No seriously, why ? I'm curious about why you think that. Because it means that you also think he is a really despicable person who deliberately lie and deceive people, as he talked many times, in countless interviews, about his reasons for acting and choosing his projects.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toghon_Temür
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeongjo_of_Joseon
Can't wait to hear him sing again, especially on this great TV show.
Confirmed to be airing in August on KBS 2TV. Yes !
I usually follow people's recommendations rather than ranked lists, especially when it comes to popularity, because as it is explained in the article, the way popularity is measured here is kind of stupid (in my opinion at least). And also because the "sociology" of the viewers should be taken in consideration too. If 80% of the viewers are women under 30, it's not very objectively representative. It's only relevant for this segment of the "population".
Good job for the article, it's a lot of work, but I personally think these lists in general (it's the same for dramas) are useless because in the same top 10 you can have a movie rated by more than 15 000 people and one by 3 000. So the value of ratings is totally different and they shouldn't be ranked together. Ranked lists should be the result of a mix of overall ratings and percentage of viewers to be a little bit more objective.