Details

  • Last Online: 6 days ago
  • Location: London
  • Contribution Points: 0 LV0
  • Roles:
  • Join Date: January 13, 2025
Replying to ella Mar 9, 2026
Absolutely - there are laws in place and that official should be punished severely. As an individual he deserves…
society and man decide what they define to be a "Crime". Its not always fair or objective but its made by those in power and usually for their self interest.

In the UK you get more jail time if you damage property. If you murder and are convicted, you could be out in less years. Property rights are more protected. The upper class made these laws in the past and continue to do so.

Can you imagine how the tax laws are written. Can you imagine how some industries and companies get government subsidies/ tax benefits and other favourable outcomes due to lobbying.

I am a freelance worker and I work through a company so I can write things off and I benefit from this system. I can pay about 5% tax while earning sometimes 3x what my friends earn BUT they pay about 45% tax. And its all legal. But is it fair. There is more theft the higher up you go.

We have typical "Daily Mail" readers in the UK that freak out at benefits fraud, but they dont care as much about company fraud. Or that Amazon not only underpays its workers, but they have put so many smaller companies out of business, use UK infrastructure and hardly pay tax. They freak out that £20k is stolen but overlook the billions lost in revenue.
PS look up Panama files as well (although some was illegal)

If you trade shares - you are not allowed to profit from insider knowledge. Do you know that in the USA, Congress is allowed to trade shares using insider knowledge. Now that is not only unfair, but it means a conflict of interest.

The whole system is f^cked up.
1 1
Replying to ella Mar 9, 2026
Absolutely - there are laws in place and that official should be punished severely. As an individual he deserves…
I think a lot of people in the west would agree with you. But some are stupid and fight on the side of billionaires - especially americans.

I dont despise tax evaders as MUCH as those that make the laws that are unfair to someone who earns an average salary. They determine what is legal tax avoidance v evasion.

Billionaires and companies influence /bribe govts to make laws that have loopholes that they can take advantage off. Its crazy how many dont pay tax and its perfectly legal. They set up trusts and offshore companies allowing certain deductions to not pay tax. And they are not evading tax. They just dont pay tax like we do, and its legal. Focus on the big picture. The system is corrupted and instead we are distracted by a rich actor getting caught. While billions go unpaid and its legal.

As for cancelling actors - I feel sorry for them and I think its a bit extreme. I understand the anger but dont like to see people destroyed. Make them pay the tax and punish them by adding a premium for being "naughty".
1 7
Replying to ella Mar 9, 2026
Absolutely - there are laws in place and that official should be punished severely. As an individual he deserves…
I didn't see the program and not aware about content involved. Im not that invested in this actor (dont hate or like him enough) - its more the principles involved. I just read a post you made about this issue.

I think its unfair that certain tax advantages and loopholes are available for the more wealthy but not to the average person. I like that these issues are being exposed and that people become aware of the double standards in the law, and how the law is made by those who have money and power to be for their advantage.

lol - I know exactly what he has done (company and structure) is to avoid paying tax and I know what my verdict is. I should wait before passing judgement but I have common sense. I do feel sorry for him because of the situation he is in and the damage it will do to him.

I dont know korean law but if he got off, I would feel that the justice system is unfair. Anyway, the koreans are harsher critics then me.
1 9
Replying to ella Mar 8, 2026
He is. I wonder why MDL selects the worst profile photo - it does not do him justice.
lol must have been added by an antifan.
I guess its one way of trolling an actor/actress + fans if you dont like them. I do wonder how its decided - who posts a photo and who can edit because the photos dont change often.
4 0
Replying to ella Mar 8, 2026
He is. I wonder why MDL selects the worst profile photo - it does not do him justice.
the other actor who has also been shortchanged here is Mark Jiruntanin Trairattanayon. He is so good looking but i would not guess by his picture. I dont know who decides on pics.
2 2
Replying to ella Mar 8, 2026
He is. I wonder why MDL selects the worst profile photo - it does not do him justice.
Go to his page and select edit page.

I have never tried and not sure if you can -or if you need permission.
You can then see what happens next or if there are any more steps involved.
5 4
Replying to Sand Mar 8, 2026
DAYUM BRO BOOM IS SO DAMN PRETTYY AHHH!!!!!!
He is. I wonder why MDL selects the worst profile photo - it does not do him justice.
9 6
Replying to Jack Mar 8, 2026
Let me share my few cents, I think it's def different than season 1, but it explores problems and messines from…
Thank you for sharing. I just thought it would be interesting to compare the two and my thoughts so far. I agree with what you say.

The first one was raw with a lot of angst. I understand why its not an enjoyable to watch for so many and why people would prefer this season 2. The original or first one punched harder, made me feel that roller-coaster ride. It was emotionally draining. So far this one feels more playful and like you said more fun. To me this feels like a gmm bl drama. It may come across as a criticism but its what gmmtv do successfully which is to please their bl audience. And you are correct that this one should be treated as its own thing.
I wonder if the budget was higher for the first one?

Im curious and to see the mess going forward. I am enjoying season2 and i do like some of the actors .
6 0
Replying to kongel Mar 8, 2026
We're two episodes in, the history might yet reveal itself. Let's be patient and see.On the microphone: you can…
It would be nice if you could actually add value to the discussion.

Wow. I really did not know that we were only two episodes in and its too early to tell, and neither did i mention that in my comment. Or do you like being as derivative as....... Im not going to say it as its only two episodes in. (that is sarcasm by the way). But what is your excuse ?

And this is an opinion, my analysis so far. Just like everyone else's here. Do you only want opinions and feedback that you mirror yours?

You think having fun at parties means holding a microphone? I wouldnt be going to your party.
3 0
On Only Friends: Dream On Mar 7, 2026
So the original scores 8 while this one scores 8.3 on MDL. This season is probably more entertaining to bl audience.

I found the original more raw and authentic. It had depth and layers. It wasn't perfect but their were stories, it tackled some heavy themes and the characters were compelling.
I know its only two episodes. And its not like Im not enjoying it. Its just that this version feels like a GMM drama with actors playing their respective roles in another bl drama.
So for me Season1 had a story to tell. Season 2 is a bl drama to be produced. The word ersatz comes to mind.

Some questions so far: Why the Rome and Romeo play again? Why do they need the microphone when speaking in a small room to about 6 people .....
13 4
Replying to wildfire160 Mar 6, 2026
So why were their missiles hitting civilian airports and hotels and specifically the very airport she was flying…
Gaslighting is discussing everything else and not focusing on who attacked first. It was not Iran.

Its been acknowledge by the US that they attacked the school. They also attacked an unarmed ship and watched the sailors drown. That is fact.
Have you seen the pictures of the little girls that were killed?

So Iran is targeting bases military bases and logistics. They have no choice. Its strategy.

Ask why is the US and Israel continuing to attack Iran instead.
2 2
Replying to ella Mar 6, 2026
When a county bombs hospitals, and is starving people, and raping prisoner (discussed in parliament) and has murdered…
You brought up "whoever is at fault" and "war broke out". That is not what happened.

They were negotiating and Iran was attacked. There was no provocation from Iran. And about 200 young pupils died. I have seen their photos and I am disgusted. Im not a Muslim but they also attacked during Ramadan.


Maybe my tone is off but i am f^cking angry at the destruction to the environment, to racism and ethnic cleansing, and the murder of civilians. Life is insignificant to these people while they pursue their profits.

And I know this is not a place for politics but if you are silent against what has happened or stay on the fence and dont acknowledge evil, then you are complicit and its a matter of time when you become the victim too. Im not going to be guilty of that.
9 3
Replying to Kaptan Mar 5, 2026
Wars are ugly. It would be better if they didn't happen. Great efforts were made, but the parties couldn't reach…
When a county bombs hospitals, and is starving people, and raping prisoner (discussed in parliament) and has murdered over 50 000 children, then you most certainly call out war crimes. You can certainly point out who is in the wrong.
Oh and that country is israel in case you are confused, or in case anyone is making excuses for concentration camps and genocide.
18 7