ella

DDS is all about noncon - a man is being violated and forced to accept life. Its not about intimacy. Do you think that I argued that noncon and rape is acceptable because you felt you had to explain that consent matters in moments of intimacy?

I dont think I even said that its pleasant to watch murder, violence, rape, noncon, or a sad tragic series but sometimes its part of the plot in a work of fiction. I watch series to entertain or experience something or to find meaning I dont watch FICTION FOR LESSONS IN MORALITY. You shouldn't either.

I never said that you condone murder.
There was murder in MANNER OF DEATH . Did you make any comments saying that those series would have been better if there wasnt a murder? Did you explain to people that THE GLORY would have been better if there was no bullying in the plot. That is my point. You didnt. But you made a comment about noncon. Their is a bias on your part in deciding to make a comment about noncon but not murder or bullying .

there is just something about Chinese bls

Why does consent matter in fiction?
We see murder, violence, mafia and we accept that without preaching morals and telling people that there shouldn't have been consent before the violence or murder?

so if a baby hits you then you should beat it up?
You are a sick human being with no accountability.
There is a difference in strength level between a woman and man and a child. And if you are the more power you have more acocuntablity. If hope you experience what Rhianna did


And chris Brown he has beat up numerous woman - and you are still defending that scum? You are sick.

you are welcome to watch GMM tv for fluff. But others also like more adult bls that are toxic and have complicated characters.
There is more fluff being produced than more mature type bls.
Also, Im not saying this is a mature bl or a toxic one either as I havent watched all of it.

thanks for explaining. I dont know him (but hate bullies) and based my opinion on the article. And I dont know anything about Korean law or the actual facts of the case.
If he is innocent i hope he gets justice.

Its crazy that a reputation can be so easily ruined by false statements. And the onus is on you to prove they are false instead of the person accusing you to prove they are true.

i dont have a preference about this case or the actor - i dont know him.
I dislike bullies and find it strange that fans dont care about facts - and overlook existing evidence and balance of probabilities and blindly believe what they want to.

There are four people who have made allegations. Said actor could not disprove that the allegations made. To be fair I would be interested in knowing what facts the four alleged victims put forward and why he cant prove he was innocent or that they lied.

But this was not a win for him. It does not mean he is guilty or innocent. And even a court finds someone guilty/not guilty - well that just means that one party has better evidence. Justice and courts do not care for the truth.

i based my opinion on the article only and i dont know all the facts to conclude anything other then what was written. I withdraw any opinions I have about his guilt or innocence and will be neutral. If he is innocent - i hope he gets justice.

I have started reading manhwa/manhua series now as they are not afraid of being twisted and dark and toxic. And usually their is a psychological perspective as well which adds depth.

The ending was rushed/open ended/changed because i think their were personal/filming production issues.
I have started reading manhwa/manhua series now as they are not afraid of being twisted and dark and toxic. Its only fiction.

the true narrative is what the court found - and its not in his favour.
End of

Your gibberish is irrelevant at the end of the day. Its the courts judgement that counts. And he lost

Yes - i hate bullies

not cool to make personal insults
The evidence is that which persuaded the court not to rule in their favour.

as a victim why would i travel to another country for a court case that is irrelevant to me.
I would want to heal and tell my story, confronting the bully. I
So why would i need to go the this bullys country to defend myself?
People are so ridiculous.

He cant disprove the victims allegations because there is enough evidence to support them.
There is strong evidence that he is a bully otherwise he would not have lost this case.
Do people here not understand this ruling - are they lacking in logic and common sense?

He lost. He is not exonerated
There is strong evidence that he is a bully,

He cant disprove the victims allegations because there is enough evidence to support them.
There is strong evidence that he is a bully otherwise he would not have lost this case.

Maybe if bullies didnt bully there would be no need for such articles

He cant disprove the victims allegations because there is enough evidence to support them.
There is strong evidence that he is a bully otherwise he would not have lost this case.

He cant disprove the victims allegations because there is enough evidence to support them.
There is strong evidence that he is a bully otherwise he would not have lost this case.

case was dismissed because there is no evidence that the accuser lied.
ie strong evidence that this guy is a bully.

case was dismissed because there is no evidence that the accuser lied.
ie strong evidence that this guy is a bully.

I DONT WANT TO SUPPORT BULLIES

He cant disprove the victims allegations because there is enough evidence to support them.
case was dismissed because there is no evidence that the accuser lied.
ie strong evidence that this guy is a bully.

He cant disprove the victims allegations because there is enough evidence to support them.
case was dismissed because there is no evidence that the accuser lied.
ie strong evidence that this guy is a bully.