As flaws, I noticed some scenes a bit unclear about when, where or why we are here. Also, some scenes have low…
This scene, I had no idea when it is, present or another flashback? Why they are here? It's a problem. And I couldn't detect the winter station was a flashback before (I was thinking about a Time jump). Quite confusing.
So about the dialog you speak about, I couldn't understand the begginning. As there is another flashback just before, thank to that we understand they talk about Jun Young (and we recognize her easely to be the girl in winter sports). I don't know if the translation is bad but there is a weird line from her "Why are you suffering more when you're the victim?". This makes no sens. The scene, dramatization and the goal of the dialog are good (she recover of the accident but not him), but some lines put us off the boat at the start.
About the two characters differences, one think more about Jun Young and the other more about the accident. It's quite normal from the characters perspective. They speak about what is important for them and are a bit blind about the other needs. What is quite good.
So now we know Taejoon and Junyoung are siblings, and the fact that Taeyang is in the middle of both siblings…
This scene got me!!! When she cross the line... I was waiting for a kiss. But in kdrama, no no no, there is an inner conflict, and it's rather a good bye. AHHH!
The drama is good, the chemistry between the leads is awesome but there is something off about the dialogues and…
As flaws, I noticed some scenes a bit unclear about when, where or why we are here. Also, some scenes have low goal or are a bit long, making a slow pace of the kind I don't like. It was mostly in episode 3, but maybe some in previous episodes too. I didn't pay too much attention but have this feeling.
Jung hwan is Jun Young's boyfriend, Tae Yang was the 3rd wheel and friends with them
I ended Episode 3 and I get that now. At 41:00 begin a flashback (winter station). The transition was unclear. I didn't understood it was a flashback, and I was thinking it was a time jump. Then she meet Jung Hwan 55:15. I was a bit lost here. We get another flashback then. But I couldn't understand the beginning of the dialog because of that... confusion.
People say it's common, but I can't remember a drama with that.Only one I know is "boys over flowers" and it's…
It's what you said in your question. A ML with 3 or more girls in love with him. Boys over flowers (A remake, I only watched the japanese original Hanari jango), it's a FL with 4 flowers boys and each one end to fall in love with her.
Disqus comments don't work properly on your website. I can't sign in though I'm already signed in in my disqus…
It's not useless, in itself it's a good exercice of drama analyze. For someone with the goal to write reviews, it's like training about to spot foreshadowing or details that matter.
I've done that with Hospital Playlist and thanks to that, my writing abilities improved, so badly written is the screenplay. I couldn't find a full list of tips about what to avoid, and more, I could see how bad it is once on screen. I did the same with King Eternal Monarch. Most of it is on my review (a review too harsh I think now, I didn't take the time to speak about positive points and I was a bit angry by the disapointement).
After that, I did a lot of corrections on my scenes. It jumped to me. When I see a 5 minutes car scene with a dialog in HP, with almost no goal (or small one), and I have myself a long car scene. What can I do? First the content of my dialog isn't useless (higher goals). But that's not enough and it's still a long 5 minutes. Then I can find a way to intercut that and cross meaning of the dialogs with others scenes. About exposition and characters introduction, same. I watch HP and see long and terrible dialogs scenes. No show, only tell. And boring scenes with characters speaking about others people we know nothing about it. Very confusing. I find I have a long dialogue scene too (exposition), better one because there is comedy. But still, it's too long, with telling only about some other people (a real screenplay mistake), we don't get the situation. Then I change that into a Montage with many flashback or others shorts scenes to make it visual.
It apply on Grid too. I don't have energy to spend more time on that, but I still took notes. It's quite interesting, because each time a point don't work on the screen, there is a way to think "how could it be done better". So it improve screenwriting ability.
What is a bit sad, it's always more easy to spot something that don't work, that something that work. About what lessons we can get from a content.
I suppose it's probably useless for audience with others hobbies than writing. It's a pain to rewatch a drama we didn't liked at first watching.
About actress Park Ju Hyun, she portrays her character well from the start. We had that feeling she was simple minded. And episode 3 confirm that with her father advice.
There is a bit of welcomed extra conflicts with others characters and trainers. These ones don't always do a good job. They accept to cancel their rules because one guy (promoted by the president) and the trainer wasn't able to understand Tae Joon strategy at the beginning of episode 3.
With Jung Hwan, we get a good additionnal arrogant and annoying guy. I'm not sure about what happened in the past, look like he was Tae Yang boyfriend?
I am used to watching back to back Chinese sports drama.....Happy there are kdrama starting off with sports too!…
I hope there is enough sport in this, because in Stove League there was really none. I still liked the drama, but understand me... I would like to watch a real sport drama now. :-D
1 
So about the dialog you speak about, I couldn't understand the begginning. As there is another flashback just before, thank to that we understand they talk about Jun Young (and we recognize her easely to be the girl in winter sports).
I don't know if the translation is bad but there is a weird line from her "Why are you suffering more when you're the victim?". This makes no sens. The scene, dramatization and the goal of the dialog are good (she recover of the accident but not him), but some lines put us off the boat at the start.
About the two characters differences, one think more about Jun Young and the other more about the accident. It's quite normal from the characters perspective. They speak about what is important for them and are a bit blind about the other needs. What is quite good.
It was mostly in episode 3, but maybe some in previous episodes too. I didn't pay too much attention but have this feeling.
At 41:00 begin a flashback (winter station). The transition was unclear. I didn't understood it was a flashback, and I was thinking it was a time jump. Then she meet Jung Hwan 55:15. I was a bit lost here. We get another flashback then. But I couldn't understand the beginning of the dialog because of that... confusion.
Only one I know is "boys over flowers" and it's a reverse harem.
I've done that with Hospital Playlist and thanks to that, my writing abilities improved, so badly written is the screenplay. I couldn't find a full list of tips about what to avoid, and more, I could see how bad it is once on screen.
I did the same with King Eternal Monarch. Most of it is on my review (a review too harsh I think now, I didn't take the time to speak about positive points and I was a bit angry by the disapointement).
After that, I did a lot of corrections on my scenes. It jumped to me. When I see a 5 minutes car scene with a dialog in HP, with almost no goal (or small one), and I have myself a long car scene. What can I do? First the content of my dialog isn't useless (higher goals). But that's not enough and it's still a long 5 minutes. Then I can find a way to intercut that and cross meaning of the dialogs with others scenes.
About exposition and characters introduction, same. I watch HP and see long and terrible dialogs scenes. No show, only tell. And boring scenes with characters speaking about others people we know nothing about it. Very confusing. I find I have a long dialogue scene too (exposition), better one because there is comedy. But still, it's too long, with telling only about some other people (a real screenplay mistake), we don't get the situation. Then I change that into a Montage with many flashback or others shorts scenes to make it visual.
It apply on Grid too. I don't have energy to spend more time on that, but I still took notes. It's quite interesting, because each time a point don't work on the screen, there is a way to think "how could it be done better". So it improve screenwriting ability.
What is a bit sad, it's always more easy to spot something that don't work, that something that work. About what lessons we can get from a content.
I suppose it's probably useless for audience with others hobbies than writing.
It's a pain to rewatch a drama we didn't liked at first watching.
I wanted to see her again with a more compeling romance, looks like it's done here.
About actress Park Ju Hyun, she portrays her character well from the start. We had that feeling she was simple minded. And episode 3 confirm that with her father advice.
There is a bit of welcomed extra conflicts with others characters and trainers. These ones don't always do a good job. They accept to cancel their rules because one guy (promoted by the president) and the trainer wasn't able to understand Tae Joon strategy at the beginning of episode 3.
With Jung Hwan, we get a good additionnal arrogant and annoying guy.
I'm not sure about what happened in the past, look like he was Tae Yang boyfriend?
I would be curious to see new actors now, and not only the previous cast.
I liked very much her role in School 2015, she was so perfectly annoying.
Your comment sounds weird to me, it's not like Hot Stove League!