Rahab75

It seems that being a loan shark, threatening, beating up and cutting people with a knife is suddenly a respectable profession as long as it is done by a glamorous main lead of a BL.

What does this all have to do with my point?

"For real though, who the hell passes out in the middle of an aggressive makeout sesh?! "

Those who are not used to hard physical work and then even drink rather too much wine afterwards, maybe.

And when could we see he felt bad? When he was knowingly cutting her hands one after other (rewatch it) with poker face and when he threw it at them on his leaving that karma is a bullshit? Seriously, you guys are unbelievable.

Maybe google what "victim-blaming" means and do not toss around it like a buzzword. Sun is not a victim here, if anyone is that is his little brother. And yes, he is partly responsible. He knew full well he was risking his family with this job.

You are the one who wants to give a free pass to someone just because he is a main lead of this story. Yes, he called that upon himself. Being a loan shark and threatening to take away an innocent child’s life and cutting her with a knife is not a normal, everyday job no matter how you try to paint it as one. Sun should have known that with his job he risks the safety of his family and he did not care. That father lost his mind and committed a horrible crime out of desperation. It is still a despicable and unforgivable crime but Sun should have considered such things are hanging in the air if he keeps doing this job. So yes, he contributed to his brother’s death. And contribution means responsibility.

That is whataboutism and justifying loan sharks. Sun exactly knew how poor people often have no other choice, he is one of them. Furthermore yes, he was doing his ILLEGAL job. Sun knowingly decided to throw people in similar financial situation under the bus. No one is defending the father’s act but Sun called that upon himself and his family. He should reflect on that a lot more.

Has anyone considered that in spite of Bank/Sunny basically Sun is still responsible for his little brother’s death? Sun decided to help wrecking other people’s lives in order to get money for his own family.

If you ask this you did not pay attention. He was the guy whose daughter Sun thrratened to kill.

Gap is not a full villain in my eyes. He is certainly not a very nice character at the moment but it is clear it has not always been like this. They were friends with Sila but Gap's horrendous father turned them against each other. Once again a rubbish parent.

I downloaded the uncut versions from a torrent site and they are all above 50.

This is a debate board, you clown. If you cannot stand being contradicted stay with playing with your barbies, kiddo.

I think so too. That’s why he said everything was blurry and that he only remembers going to Nao afterwards.

So did Suar kill the guy? It was ambiguously presented. Could it be that eventually he didn’t?

And as usual the rating is ridiculous.

It does exist. Each uncut episode is over 50 minutes.

The whole dancing was Phitcha's mother pressure, he clearly did not want to do it in the first place. She is selfish af.

I don't know if anyone had this take but this story - consciously or not - is actually a fierce indictment against the Asian institute of filial piety with its selfish and abusive parents eventually wrecking the lives of their kids, making them turn into either monsters or living dead zombies in the fake, mendacious name of parental love, care and concern.

You are clearly a typical foamy-mouthed virtue signaller who jumped on a fashionable bandwagon based on pseudo-scientific headlines just to feel relevant and morally superior. It is quite amusing when your ilk talks about being educated. Lol.

I say it is normal simply because it is a part of our life and it is not going anywhere. Learning to use it sensibly is much more effective for the future than this hysterical luddite tantrum your kind demonstrates, but you might realise this too if you have the chance to go beyond the IQ and EQ level of a 12 years old.

Whether I like AI or not has feck all to do with the fact the filmmakers need to portray realistic situations and a spoiled city yuppie kid using AI to ask about agricultural methods is the most realistic take in 2026, so it is clear and logical they go for this in a script. They have no obligations to join your culture war. Not grasping this is a clear evidence one does not have to use AI to have the critical thinking ability of an aamoeba.

AI usage is a part of 2026, and it is normal. Switch down your hysteria.