Rahab75

I have never wanted to convince you, since it is obvious from the beginning that you are a self-righteous but absolutely clueless, ignorant clinical case and a foaming-mouthed human garbage. The only reason I am doing what I am doing is to call out mentally handicapped virtue signallers and gate keepers who are gaslighting these boards over and over.

You did not even comprehend what happened. The drunk person intitiated the sexual intercourse, which they both thoroughly enjoyeed, and you talk about "abuse", you poor little thing. You don't even know what you are watching. And no, sober person can have consensual sex with a drunk person. It is totally fine as long as the drunk party is conscious and knows and wants what they are doing. Just like here. It is not rape, and it is not illegal, you are babbling utter nonsense again. If someone is capable to hold a lucid and meaningful conversation and not only initiates sex, but subsequently actively participates in a sexual intercourse, then they are conscious and absolutely capable to give consent. Nothing changes this fact, even if your bird brain cannot absorb it.

"someone who is drunk can not consent" is the epitome of stupidity for anyone who ever had either sex or consumed alcohol or both, but even if it were true (it is not) you are contradicting yourself within a sentence, you moron, when you previously state it is ok, when two drunk people - who according to you cannot consent - do it. It is rare to see someone like you not only pouring the petrol to yourself but also flailing with the lighter.

If anyone is a disgusting piece of shit here, it is you, who have the audacity to call my relationship abuse becausae we got together after drinking and this does not match your puritannical and hypocritical standards and deranged mentality you have absolutely no right to shove down others' throat. You are just sick and make every decent person puke.

You are not only thick as pigshit, but you are clearly a deranged psychopath.

From the example it is clear you have not even grasped why I called you 12 years old. Because apparently you know nothing about either sex or alcohol consumption, you write such absurdities like a child.

People have consensual drunk sex every day, you retarded idiot, whether you like it or not. No wonder nobody else came up with such shit even on this generally very puritannical and purist board, because even here no one is this mentally insane.

The drama started with a consensual drunk sex without rape, it is clear for everyone who is sane, adult and their mental abilities do not suffer from any disorder. These obviously cannot be told about you.

I have made several points, none of which you could contradict, because that would require some intellectual capacity and adult behaviour, all you can do is throwing slurs, ad hominems and SJW buzzwords hysterically. You are pathetic. Feel free to choke on your vomit in your next hate seizure. Lmao.

Take a deep breath, gurl. Lol.

When you'll be a little older and more mature than a 12 years old one, you'll learn that drunk sex is a part of mankind since forever, that is what bars, night clubs and parties are there for. People drink to lower their inhibitions and then have sex with whoever they like.

You will also learn that alcohol is not a love potion which transforms you to someone else. It does nothing but lowers your inhibitions and makes you do things you are willing to do anyway, but with less reservations. If someone is black out drunk that is a completely different story, but that is not the case here, neither it is in most cases when MDL puritans have meltdown about it. You are not having sex with someone you don't like just because you are drunk.

You clearly come across as a virgin schoolgirl who has probably never sipped a glass of beer, nothing else explains why you write such utter bullshit. Drunk sex is not rape, kiddo, as long as the parties are conscious and they both know and want what they are doing. But to know this, one needs to have experience about both drinking and having sex, and you are clearly demonstrating you quite possibly had neither. Educate yourself, then you may not make such a clown of yourself publicly. Throwing up and having a splash in your face with cold water, plus some rest on a couch clears one up considerably up to the point of being able to walk upstairs. Totally realistic, this has happened to me many times in parties. Everyone who ever had a booze knows this.

I did not rape anyone, we had a very good consensual fuck and we started dating the day after, but I will tell David later he was apparently raped by me, because a fruitcake on MDL told me so. I am sure he is gonna have a good laugh.

What is both hilarious and sad when tight-arsed puritans try to twist, make leaps and bounds forward with crystal clear situations like this to transform it into non-consent only to give themselves a room for virtue signalling. Nothing is more harmful to real rape victims, and nothing diminishes their trauma more effectively than when clueless, ignorant tits like you are doing this, just saying. But your type seldom cares about real rape victims, you just love wallowing in faux outrage.

Are you a 12 years old schooboy/schoolgirl, you dingbat? I am a middle-aged guy and I have had my spare of booze in my life, including drunk sex. At least 80% of my sexual intercourses involved booze, sometimes mutually, sometimes only me was drunk, sometimes the other way around, so lecture someone else about alcohol consumption, kiddo.

There is a clear difference between intoxication and incapacitation. If someone is capable to hold a lucid and meaningful conversation and not only initiates sex, but subsequently actively participates in a sexual intercourse, then they are conscious and absolutely capable to give consent, and everyone with half a brain can tell this was the case. They know what they are doing. End of the story. The rest is pure gaslighting. Your body always loses control long before your clear mind. I have been to a political rally with a group. We went to the pub straight away once the rally was over, and we were drinking from late afternoon to the evening. I got together with a guy. He was lurching around afterwards and once even slipped on the stairs, I had to catch him. But apart from that, we had a meaningful and deep conversation about life and politics. I took him home that night and I had to help him walking home, he relied on me. We had a cracking good sex that night we both thoroughly enjoyed.

If you are indeed 12 years old, then grow up. If you are an adult and just stuck on the IQ and EQ level of a 12 years old one, then wipe the foam off your mouth and seek help. In the meantime, thanks for the entertainment.

Another nutjob who thinks every drunk sex is rape. Grow up.

Yes, it is.

My other favourite is "I am skipping this, I am skipping that, I hate them so I am skipping every scene with them, I am watching it at 2x speed, at 4x speed, at 360x speed" and when as a direct consequence of the above nothing makes sense "It is sooo confusiiiing".

So now we can safely drop the theory that Ritsu is faking the amnesia.

Once again I cannot decide whether to laugh or cry at MDL kindergarten comment section.

The quality of this show is not consistently good and it is understandably devisive, but good lord, people being pissed because a mystery series that is meant to be confusing and puzzling by default apparently confuses and puzzles?

Are you also pissed when action movies are violent? Are you pissed at Agatha Christie for not kowing who the killer is after 3 pages? Facepalm.

For a low-budget production it is actually quite polished and slick, the pace is good, the cast is able and the narrative is quite interesting so far. Nothing groundbreaking but enjoyable.

I am n ot sure it is always up to the service provider. Kinn Porsche and Dear Doctor were airing there and they had decent subs. This is an AisPlay production and they usually provide the subs for their shows. Gaga subs are not always bad. For Smeantic Errot for instance, they had better subs than Viki.

This air balloon pealing bullshitting is getting increasingly tiresome.

There is a clear difference between intoxication and incapacitation and you don't have to be a Noble prize-winning brain surgeon to know which is which. If someone is capable to hold a lucid and meaningful conversation and not only initiates sex, but subsequently actively participates in a sexual intercourse, then they are conscious and absolutely capable to give consent. They know what they are doing. End of the story. The rest is pure gaslighting.

If you are "reckless" and "cautious" enough to have consensual drunk sex with someone you are attracted to but from whom you have refrained so far, then you were SEDUCED (or you became the seductor, just like in this case). It has fuck all to do with consent/non consent. If you regret your decision the day after, it does not make a consensual sex non-consensual retroactively. All adults should know this, but I am getting gradually convinced I am arguing with 12 years old schoolgirls on this board in 90%.

Your last paragraph tells how much you don't get the essence, how twisted your logic is and how you look at the proceedings totally upside down. If you decide to give yourself to someone in a drunk but conscious state, you cannot blame the other person for accepting the offer. What is both hilarious and sad when tight-arsed puritans try to twist, make leaps and bounds forward with crystal clear situations like this to transform it into non-consent only to give themselves a room for virtue signalling. Nothing is more harmful to real rape victims, and nothing diminishes their trauma more effectively than this, just saying.

And this story is just too adult and complex for the average black and white... cough, cough... "red flag/green flag" BL fangirls.

No great shakes, but it is not a bad one, I enjoy it on a moderate level. But the company is a mess, they seemingly cannot get their shit together in terms of streaming rights.

I don't know where did you get the idea that this is my favourite show. I happen to like it and it is a decent crafstmanship with solid acting, for sure, but I have never said it is my fave.

It is the phenomenon I have the problem with that BL fangirls make tantrum when a BL series is not just about the MLs all around, then start skipping when side characters arrive (Who btw have important addition to the proceedings of the MLs as well), and when as a direct consequence of this things do not make sense they start shitting on a plot they do not even watch properly. And yeah, that is immature.

The idol's death and Ritsu's apparent death wish seem to be related, at least it is strongly hinted, yet you say you did not find it interesting. What can I say to that? The entire series is about how the characters reflect, look back on themselves and revalue their lives in a turbulent situation like this - as it was already pointed out to you by somebody else above - yet you demand god knows what they should do as the end of the world approaching, like running up and down hysterycally? You simply don't understand the plot, but that is really not the fault of the script.

I have no problem with sensible criticism and valid counter-arguments, but you have neither. Don't flatter yourself, you are not enough to make me angry. Exhausted at worst.

I tell you a secret. If something immature is done by loads of others it does not make it any less immature. You know 'Eat shit because fifty billion flies can't be wrong.'

I asked a question, you replied, and your response made it clear you don't understand the narrative and you wanna buy what this show has no intention to sell. So you kind of proved my point, thanks.

For instance, episode 5 more than hinted that the death of Meguru's pop idol sister has something to do with Ritsu as well as Yuma's assumed supernatural capabilities might change the outcome we have suspected so far. But to know these of yourse one has to watch it properly.

And in all honesty, if you cannot sit through 24 minutes running time without skipping, you'd probably better to stick to TikTok videos.

I cannot see sub info.

https://www.amazon.co.jp/-/en/%E5%B0%8F%E5%AE%AE%E7%92%83%E5%A4%AE/dp/B0BT1J5WZ4/ref=sr_1_3?crid=1JKKW2KZ9YQXY&keywords=%E3%82%B0%E3%83%A9%E3%83%B3%E3%82%AE%E3%83%8B%E3%83%A7%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AB&qid=1677954186&sprefix=grand+guignol%2Caps%2C310&sr=8-3

A lot are happening, This sort of thing is called character-driven drama but judging from the extremely clueless comments you have sprinkled here it is clear that you don't understand what you are watching.
I don't know what is more immature, skipping scenes or subsequently wondering you don't know shit. From episode 5 and 6 it is obvious the new characters are essential for the narrative.

The studio has deleted its YouTube channel so it is no longer available there. You need to look for it in various pirate sites. No other choice.

Here we are again. When it is not their "babies" from wall to wall in each episode, the moanfest starts.

Episode 4 was an important introduction of Masumi's past as well as an interesting insight into how Ritsu was apparently his soulmate and emotional support before ending on bad terms, it also created opportunity for character development as in the present Ritsu kind of makes self-sacrifice - apparently out of pure care - in order to stop Masumi from doing he does not want to but feels his duty to do.

Episode 5 introduces not only a very intersting new character but an exciting new dynamic between Meguru and Yuma. It is also blatantly obvious that Meguru's arrival is a key moment to get to know something about Ritsu's past, as they are clearly connected.

What the sodding hell are you whining about?