Details
- Last Online: 19 hours ago
- Location:
- Contribution Points: 240 LV3
- Birthday: November 01
- Roles: VIP
- Join Date: March 2, 2021
- Awards Received:
71
142
14
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
71
142
14
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Unfortunately many people have been thru that, while some dramas can offer those comfort when those issues are tackled it can either be triggering or belittling for some when the behaviour is brushed off and accepted on screen.
I did not notice any problems with your English, and even if there would be I would rather ask if I do not understand than see people not commenting. Someone commented in a language I do not understand but google translate worked its magic so whatever language you choose I hope you keep writing your thoughts. ❤
And yes I agree the ending in CLOY was a bit confusing...
2. I said he interrupted it, not blocked, but that does not really matter , I do however get the feeling that you are purposely miss interpreting and nitpicking on my choices of words so this is as far as I am willing to try to clarify.
My writing is obviously not everyones cup of tea I respect that, and hope you find articles that you enjoy reading more.
2. Second of all I loved most of the dramas in both part one and two but wanted to point out the behaviour not the dramas and open up the conversation about consent, not in any way ruin the experience of watching these. And I am sorry you feel disappointed.
3. I understand that you assume that dramas mentioned here are mentioned here as bad examples, then I would like to clarify that they are not. They are used to show a pallet and places where there can e issues regarding consent but not necessarily and as comparison. Part 0ne- behavior to watch out for part two- relatable portrayals of relationships etc. They are fundamentally different in both tone and use of dramas. that is why I did not really know how to reply to your comments.
So here is what I can say about Pinocchio- A very clear case of mixed messages, the hand is very clear with its no but the hiccups say yes, I firmly believe that it is better to have patients in this type of situation, not to risk anything and want to stress the right to a persons own body and to say no even if they want to kiss.
In this situation she did want to kiss and this situation as a whole was nice on film and did turn in to a consensual kiss.
I do explain that after a kiss one should check for affirmation, did the person kiss back or not
In real life there is no pinocchio and many people do cross other peoples boundaries so showing this gif made place for me to write about this type of situation not much more, put in the context of the other gifs and kisses where I explain about checking for affirmation it fills a purpose.
And here is what I have to say about WWWSK I love this couple (also the one Pinocchio) It i one of few dramas I have rewatched and I love the dynamics, the humor and chemistry. I do think he as whole does show respect towards her and does respect her boundaries later on in the show. We also get to know more and more about their relationship as the show progresses. However he does use his position to keep her close for 9 years giving him access to her, he does use his position to interrupt her blind date and to give him access to her, here she has little choice to say no that does effect her ability to consent to the amount of time has access to her, that is worth mentioning not as a buuuu this is a bad guy but as a this is worth noting. He also waited until she had decided to quit to start pursuing her so he is not one of those CEOs who use their position to force someone to be with them. If I gave that impression again I apologize and I do think that is made pretty clear in the text as well as on comparison to the examples in the green box and in my conclusions in the end.
I hope this made things clearer instead of confusing, and I do hope you will ask questions if something I write is not made clear in the future.