Editorials Details
- Last Online: Aug 16, 2026
- Gender: Female
- Location: Underneath multiple weighted blankets....
- Contribution Points: 19 LV1
- Birthday: August 12
- Roles: VIP
- Join Date: October 11, 2015
- Awards Received:
30
23
1
1
Editorials
K-Drama
Editorials
30
23
1
1
But you definitely have to be in the mood for cheesiness. And have 2 free hours of your life available that you want to sacrifice. xD
In the second episode they had the classic: 'I caught you and stared deeply into your eyes' scene.
Plus there have been a lot of flirtatious photoshoots the drama has put out of them in couple-like poses.
While I'm still not this director's hugest fan, things were MUCH easier to follow and connect with in this second episode. The characters were fleshed out better; I didn't feel like I had whiplash going from scene-to-scene. But most importantly, it was coherent and made SENSE. :D
Such a relief.
Hopefully things continue in THIS direction and the first episode can be thought of as that annoying growing pain you just have to live through. xD
I have honestly no idea what the focus is supposed to be? Everything in this drama is just a bit confusing in how its set up and portrayed.
I hope the directing style changes. I'm hoping for a better episode 2.
I only thought the directing was bad. Not the story itself. I thought I explained that in my post fairly clearly. I guess you just misunderstood what I was trying to convey. :/
And guess what, I found out something SUPER DISAPPOINTING: ....The director, Hong Sung Chang also directed Kang Koo's Story. THAT WAS HONESTLY THE WORST THING I HAVE EVER WATCHED. *disgustedface*
Ji Sung is the best thing since sliced bread so OF COURSE I'm going to continue watching. I sincerely hope it gets better and that the directing for this show doesn't ruin it for me.
*fingers crossed* .....*Praying to all my drama-gods out there* .....*please don't disappoint me!!!!*
....I'm honestly crying on the inside. TT_TT My poor, poor Ji Sung!
Please tell me I'm not the only one!
I think the only time I haven't hated English being used in an Asian drama was in Oh My Venus with Henry. They didn't have him purposefully speak his lines slower or not act the emotions properly either....he was just normal.
I think they subtitled what he said a lot of the time too so non-English speakers could understand. If I was in charge, I think that would be the direction I'd take....I wouldn't purposefully change the way a language is spoken...especially if subtitles can solve that problem.
With native English speakers, I've always assumed it is just bad acting and their only qualifying factor for getting the job was just that they could speak English.
For other actors where English is a second language, I've just assumed that a lot of concentration is placed on saying the words correctly, so also trying to act in an unfamiliar language, is obviously extremely difficult.
The idea that someone is purposefully leaving important inflections out so it can be understood by others....is weird to me. How would leaving out the correct emotions help someone understand the same word better?....
Maybe it's because my second language is ASL and emotions/emphasis are a huge part of the grammar and being understood. xD
I'm not fluent enough in any other spoken language to be able to attest to this type of speaking style for a foreign language helping others more readily understand what is being said.
I agree with everything you said in your review. So glad you enjoyed it! It became my 2nd favorite drama of all-time.
But in this specific situation, the guy was clearly a native-born English speaker, just not from the US. I *think* he's from the UK, but I could be wrong. So it was just jarring to hear the characters keep emphasizing and referring to him as "American." ....As if that matters. The storyline would be no different if he was a reporter from the UK. So, that was just weird for me.
But something that CAN be changed is every English speaking person automatically being associated with the US. Especially for roles that are so minor and it doesn't really even matter if they're from the US anyway. I think the guy from the "World Times" could easily have passed as a reporter from the UK. And that would have been much more believable and reflective of his accent. Why can't the UK do in-depth reporting in a war-torn country? Why does it have to be just the US. Or with any other European actor and utilizing their native country; a character could be German or French and they're using English because that's the most commonly known second-language. It would just add to the continuity and credibility of the story.
But again, it's an incredibly minor detail. Just something I wish the people in charge would consider.