Thanks for the article. I really appreciate reading your thoughts and it got me to thinking. I will have to beg to differ on your ideas though. I think that comparing Tia Mu to Kimura is like comparing apples to oranges.
SPOILER-ISH!!!
Kimura was not never intended to be the hero and was never written to make the choices that you are suggesting. He never had the opportunity to have motivations or choose outside of the character mold. He was never intended to be the hero of the nation (I don't think he was even Korean) but Tia Mu was meant to be the heroine of the nation and a beacon of socialist ideals - not humanist ideals as you are suggesting. I don't think Tia Mu would have made the same choices to save Japanese children as she did the Chinese children. She was written this way and, again, she is the Chinese socialist ideal as a woman. Compare her to Yu Hao who was given more agency than her and who was written to be the real hero of the story. Yan Zhi, our heroine, behaved in self-serving ways and also chose to become a KMT officer whose course needed to be constantly corrected by the ultimate hero Yu Hao.
Tia Mu never had the opportunity to become like Kimura and visa versa. I mean why couldn't Man Na become the type of character as Tia Mu or visa cersa? Because Man Na was another Kimura. They were both written to be betrayers of the nation who were corrupted by money and power (Tia Mu didn't have any at that scale to compare), the Japanese, and ultimately had put love of their family/death of a loved one above the nation. They were both driven to avenge their family (the clan). This was an ideal that would have been praiseworthy if it wasn't superseded the , now, praiseworthy ideals of nationalism during the late 19th early 20th Century.
To be honest, I believe that Kimura demonstrated the same qualities that Tia Mu did. He was smart, brave, made his own decisions and was loyal. I believe that if Tia Mu had her parents around she would have had to have aquiesced to her parents just as much or even more so than Kimura. The writing amps up his "negative" qualities after the the death of his brother and milked his jealousy (Kang To was just as jealous) to portray him as a villian and so downplayed his "positive" qualities.
I think Kimura is a more complex and beautiful character compared to Tia Mu.
I also believe that Gibran wrote on the level of the human experience that transcends national boundaries. I don't feel that we can compare these characters at that level which it appears you are trying to do. If we were to, I feel that Kimura is, in fact, a better character than Tia Mu in this regard. He was willing to reach out to the Korean children and love his wet nurse who was Korean. Kimura really only had a personal vandetta against his friend for the killing of his brother.
i am watching this raw as it comes out and am up to the latest episode. i think tiffany tang/luojin fans should…
So glad you brought up the sappy violin music. I’m pretty sure I last heard it in To Be A Better Man and In the Name Of The People. I might be wrong but I remember the last few times I heard that music thinking how “in your face” it was. To use the same music again her and so much I basically FF.
I got to thinking tonight that razy drama did at least 3 false positives that were a huge waste of time (below…
1. The big to do about Shu Che going to jail. We all knew he wouldn’t go. Let’s just show and tell and flash back that Shu Che stand up guy. 2. Money loving Cheng Ran. We all know he won’t Give the company car back so why make a big deal of asking him to give the car to the right person. We all know he won’t divorce his wife so what’s with bringing Lukas parents over for elaborate discussion. Yuan, we know he’s a wastrel. 3. Xiao Qong to leave school and return to her family’s side. This was by far the biggest waste of screen time. I thought she might actually leave but wait What??!!!
I only watched to 23 and as far as I could tell each of the main characters had this weird red herring like focus on them. I recall the two second leads being played out similarly. Honestly, I can’t figure out this storytelling device. Whatever it was to accomplish fell short of the mark for me.
I got to thinking tonight that razy drama did at least 3 false positives that were a huge waste of time (below in spoiler). The drama wasn’t interesting, funny or meaningful in any way except to serve as moral propaganda. The corny violin music seemingly an anthem for filial depression? -that I’ve come to recognize in a number of these modern dramas- was super distracting. The more I think about it the more I dislike this drama.
Often we focus way too much on the offender and forget about the wellbeing of the victim. Hopefully the girl is healing from that trauma and will get the support she needs. As for the actor, I hope the justice system will let him pay for his crime. As for us, let’s not add to the confusion and hate.
Personally, I didn’t like all three dramas and stopped them at various stages in their run. I can stick through a drama even though it has faults (like Misty a JBTC drama) but I couldn’t finish any of these. I thought the characters and their interactions ridiculous in the first, got tired of the circular plot of the second, and was not impressed with the unrealistic and shallow plot of the third. I get the reasons for the hype of DOTS but I can’t see anything remarkable about the production.
The ratings of cable dramas are relative to those of the main three and the percentage of the market over time. Nowadays, cable dramas are getting greater market share. And JBTC dramas are not usually flops as a general rule. Take, for example, Heartless City, Secret Love Affair, A Wife’s Credentials, etc. Suzy’s acting has improved but I don’t think she is one of the strengths of the drama. So even if people thought it would flop because of her it doesn’t mean she made it the blockbuster (how meaningful is this term?). And, I don’t know about the KBS story, but actors will turn down roles for many reasons (eg. a role might not suit them, busy schedule) and not because they anticipated a drama to be a flop.
Hi Irusu. Just wondering if you could make the distinction, in your next article, with OST (Original Soundtrack) as being the collection of music for drama/film. I noticed from the comments that people are calling individual songs OSTs. Your article gives that impressions since you said that your fave OSTs are the three songs. This is a great topic btw. As you can see from my comments, I’ve been here three times today.
To speak honestly, as a Jamaican born, I don’t know how I feel about the reggae vibes in Dream. The way the reggae groove and island sound is only used at the intro and chorus and toned down during the verses leads me to speculate that the artist only used it as sample for a hook/accompaniment to the particular words and doesn't get the genre itself. I understand the blending of music genres but it doesn’t feel like this is the case here. Whenever I hear music with roots from the black community that is meant as consumer product for Koreans - who have little appreciation for or understanding of the history and intention of the music, it does turn me off.
personally Misty's OST painful love was amazing it had a 90's feel to it, and my mister OST both Adult by sondia…
I just listen to this. I didn’t take note of it during the drama but now I remember the feelings it evoked. You are totally right about the 90’s feel and it’s beautiful!
It’s literally been 5 years since I’ve really enjoyed a song from an OST. My faves have got to be Adult (My Mister), Monochrome (Miracle We Met), and Love Destiny and Oh My Love (Buppe Saniwaat). I can’t believe there are this many and the year isn’t half over.
Sorry y’all who are going to hate me for this post but I had to ask: did anyone else not like this story as much as I didn’t? I feel like part of the fault is that the nuances of the dialogue are lost in google translator. But seriously, I had such a hard time with the plot and up to now (ep5) I still can predict the next scene and mouth the next line before it’s spoken. The actors play characters I’ve seen before and ones they themselves have played before. The chemistry between the leads is non existent and so I can’t really understand why they are in love so bad. The whole production also feels like an echo of 10 miles when listening to the voice actors and observing the scenery. And, God forbid, I find William Chan and Cecelia Liu overated. I’m particularly frustrated. Anyone feeling me?
Well thinked, some dramas reflex this tension, tension which exist in every society, but in Korea the capitalism…
Not sure I understand completely what you have written. I do agree that the show does bring up the tensions of current Korean society. Like youth suicide, which it seems both Jian and Gwangil contemplated, and abandonment the elderly - who also have high suicide rates in Korea.
I find this show so interesting and multilayered. I got to thinking tonight about its portrayal of clan/collective ideals and capitalist/individualist ideals that come up against each other in Korean society and the consequences of that conflict in the lives of the characters. The role of the ajusshi - an old school type hero with old school values - in his corporate, community and family life is beautifully captured in this show. His relatinship with Jian threads through these areas of Dong Hoon’s life to give us a very human experience of the hero. Love this show to pieces. Well done.
SPOILER-ISH!!!
Kimura was not never intended to be the hero and was never written to make the choices that you are suggesting. He never had the opportunity to have motivations or choose outside of the character mold. He was never intended to be the hero of the nation (I don't think he was even Korean) but Tia Mu was meant to be the heroine of the nation and a beacon of socialist ideals - not humanist ideals as you are suggesting. I don't think Tia Mu would have made the same choices to save Japanese children as she did the Chinese children. She was written this way and, again, she is the Chinese socialist ideal as a woman. Compare her to Yu Hao who was given more agency than her and who was written to be the real hero of the story. Yan Zhi, our heroine, behaved in self-serving ways and also chose to become a KMT officer whose course needed to be constantly corrected by the ultimate hero Yu Hao.
Tia Mu never had the opportunity to become like Kimura and visa versa. I mean why couldn't Man Na become the type of character as Tia Mu or visa cersa? Because Man Na was another Kimura. They were both written to be betrayers of the nation who were corrupted by money and power (Tia Mu didn't have any at that scale to compare), the Japanese, and ultimately had put love of their family/death of a loved one above the nation. They were both driven to avenge their family (the clan). This was an ideal that would have been praiseworthy if it wasn't superseded the , now, praiseworthy ideals of nationalism during the late 19th early 20th Century.
To be honest, I believe that Kimura demonstrated the same qualities that Tia Mu did. He was smart, brave, made his own decisions and was loyal. I believe that if Tia Mu had her parents around she would have had to have aquiesced to her parents just as much or even more so than Kimura. The writing amps up his "negative" qualities after the the death of his brother and milked his jealousy (Kang To was just as jealous) to portray him as a villian and so downplayed his "positive" qualities.
I think Kimura is a more complex and beautiful character compared to Tia Mu.
I also believe that Gibran wrote on the level of the human experience that transcends national boundaries. I don't feel that we can compare these characters at that level which it appears you are trying to do. If we were to, I feel that Kimura is, in fact, a better character than Tia Mu in this regard. He was willing to reach out to the Korean children and love his wet nurse who was Korean. Kimura really only had a personal vandetta against his friend for the killing of his brother.
2. Money loving Cheng Ran. We all know he won’t Give the company car back so why make a big deal of asking him to give the car to the right person. We all know he won’t divorce his wife so what’s with bringing Lukas parents over for elaborate discussion. Yuan, we know he’s a wastrel.
3. Xiao Qong to leave school and return to her family’s side. This was by far the biggest waste of screen time. I thought she might actually leave but wait What??!!!
I only watched to 23 and as far as I could tell each of the main characters had this weird red herring like focus on them. I recall the two second leads being played out similarly. Honestly, I can’t figure out this storytelling device. Whatever it was to accomplish fell short of the mark for me.
Personally, I didn’t like all three dramas and stopped them at various stages in their run. I can stick through a drama even though it has faults (like Misty a JBTC drama) but I couldn’t finish any of these. I thought the characters and their interactions ridiculous in the first, got tired of the circular plot of the second, and was not impressed with the unrealistic and shallow plot of the third. I get the reasons for the hype of DOTS but I can’t see anything remarkable about the production.
The ratings of cable dramas are relative to those of the main three and the percentage of the market over time. Nowadays, cable dramas are getting greater market share. And JBTC dramas are not usually flops as a general rule. Take, for example, Heartless City, Secret Love Affair, A Wife’s Credentials, etc. Suzy’s acting has improved but I don’t think she is one of the strengths of the drama. So even if people thought it would flop because of her it doesn’t mean she made it the blockbuster (how meaningful is this term?). And, I don’t know about the KBS story, but actors will turn down roles for many reasons (eg. a role might not suit them, busy schedule) and not because they anticipated a drama to be a flop.