I mean, if we're talking accountability, shouldn't it start with the person who took out a mafia loan they couldn't…
And when could we see he felt bad? When he was knowingly cutting her hands one after other (rewatch it) with poker face and when he threw it at them on his leaving that karma is a bullshit? Seriously, you guys are unbelievable.
I mean, if we're talking accountability, shouldn't it start with the person who took out a mafia loan they couldn't…
Maybe google what "victim-blaming" means and do not toss around it like a buzzword. Sun is not a victim here, if anyone is that is his little brother. And yes, he is partly responsible. He knew full well he was risking his family with this job.
I mean, if we're talking accountability, shouldn't it start with the person who took out a mafia loan they couldn't…
You are the one who wants to give a free pass to someone just because he is a main lead of this story. Yes, he called that upon himself. Being a loan shark and threatening to take away an innocent child’s life and cutting her with a knife is not a normal, everyday job no matter how you try to paint it as one. Sun should have known that with his job he risks the safety of his family and he did not care. That father lost his mind and committed a horrible crime out of desperation. It is still a despicable and unforgivable crime but Sun should have considered such things are hanging in the air if he keeps doing this job. So yes, he contributed to his brother’s death. And contribution means responsibility.
I mean, if we're talking accountability, shouldn't it start with the person who took out a mafia loan they couldn't…
That is whataboutism and justifying loan sharks. Sun exactly knew how poor people often have no other choice, he is one of them. Furthermore yes, he was doing his ILLEGAL job. Sun knowingly decided to throw people in similar financial situation under the bus. No one is defending the father’s act but Sun called that upon himself and his family. He should reflect on that a lot more.
Has anyone considered that in spite of Bank/Sunny basically Sun is still responsible for his little brother’s death? Sun decided to help wrecking other people’s lives in order to get money for his own family.
OMFGGGGGGGG FLUKEEEEEEEE IS MY WEAKNESSJust like Boss (BossNoeul), Fluke has this MAJOR DADDY VIBE but in the…
Gap is not a full villain in my eyes. He is certainly not a very nice character at the moment but it is clear it has not always been like this. They were friends with Sila but Gap's horrendous father turned them against each other. Once again a rubbish parent.
I don't know if anyone had this take but this story - consciously or not - is actually a fierce indictment against the Asian institute of filial piety with its selfish and abusive parents eventually wrecking the lives of their kids, making them turn into either monsters or living dead zombies in the fake, mendacious name of parental love, care and concern.
They were referring to Ep 2, where he listened to tips from AI. He did not watch a You Tube video. He actually…
You are clearly a typical foamy-mouthed virtue signaller who jumped on a fashionable bandwagon based on pseudo-scientific headlines just to feel relevant and morally superior. It is quite amusing when your ilk talks about being educated. Lol.
I say it is normal simply because it is a part of our life and it is not going anywhere. Learning to use it sensibly is much more effective for the future than this hysterical luddite tantrum your kind demonstrates, but you might realise this too if you have the chance to go beyond the IQ and EQ level of a 12 years old.
Whether I like AI or not has feck all to do with the fact the filmmakers need to portray realistic situations and a spoiled city yuppie kid using AI to ask about agricultural methods is the most realistic take in 2026, so it is clear and logical they go for this in a script. They have no obligations to join your culture war. Not grasping this is a clear evidence one does not have to use AI to have the critical thinking ability of an aamoeba.
Two things can be true: the father was awful, but abuse still doesn’t justify intentionally triggering someone…
Oh poor abusive old man who tortured his son physically and mentally throughout his life was "triggered" by his son saying he loves someone the old monster was oppsing. My heart is breaking for him. Oh wait, no. Well-done. Hopefully that human garbage rots in hell. Lu Feng should have opened a bottle of champagne.
I say it is normal simply because it is a part of our life and it is not going anywhere. Learning to use it sensibly is much more effective for the future than this hysterical luddite tantrum your kind demonstrates, but you might realise this too if you have the chance to go beyond the IQ and EQ level of a 12 years old.
Whether I like AI or not has feck all to do with the fact the filmmakers need to portray realistic situations and a spoiled city yuppie kid using AI to ask about agricultural methods is the most realistic take in 2026, so it is clear and logical they go for this in a script. They have no obligations to join your culture war. Not grasping this is a clear evidence one does not have to use AI to have the critical thinking ability of an aamoeba.