122
415
15
2
6
2
7
9
3
12
1
1
1
1
2
4
7
4
9
"Please don't poo at home"
One glance at the title, poster, and synopsis of My Perfect Roommate and you know what’s coming. While the film may have been short on surprises, it delivered on what it set out to do---cause you to smile, cry and feel your heart warm.A new program that matches seniors with young tenants is meant to help out both generations. The older person is given company and financial help and the younger person is given an economical place to live along with the benefit of learning from a senior citizen. Cranky, socially isolated Geum Bun reluctantly takes in university student and part-time worker Han Ji Woong. The parentless student goes out of his way to help people, having only himself to rely on. Woong arrives to see a floor that bears a striking resemblance to a Frank Lloyd Wright painting with red, yellow, and blue tape delineating his, hers, and common areas. Woong discovers even the toilet is off limits to him. Not exactly a match made in heaven, but one that would teach both elder and youngster a few life lessons.
My Perfect Roommate highlighted the isolation some seniors face. Geum Bun never married and had no children, living her days alone. One of Woong’s jobs was cleaning apartments after a person died, the loss often unnoticed for days. Woong grew up in an orphanage and faced discrimination because he had no parents. He tried extra hard to be seen as a model student and obedient child in order to earn love and trust, which was never guaranteed. Both characters suffered from not fitting in, one eschewed friendships and the other never let any one in too close lest they discover his secret.
Na Moon Hee can always be counted on to shine in any halmeoni role whether handing out lollipops or verbal butt whippings and Geum Bun was no different. MPR may have been predictable yet still managed to tug at my heartstrings with this unconventional made family. If you are in need of a feel-good film, this roommate might not be perfect but it knows to put the toilet seat down and not eat your last yogurt in the frig.
21 February 2025
Trigger Warning! One scene has a gruesome display of insects if those bother you.
Was this review helpful to you?
"Just because you see it with your eyes...Do you believe it?"
Unidentified was anything but straightforward. File it under absurd arthouse, low budget, independent, allegorical tale, and musical sci-fi endeavor. The movie combined seemingly random vignettes and documentary style scenes. Weirdly, it worked on different levels, but will likely not appeal to most.In 1993, giant spheres settled over major cities around the world. No first contact, just silence…for 29 years. As people became accustomed to the new sky décor, an international theory developed: Alien Mind Control Syndrome. Whether aliens were controlling people’s minds or masquerading as people was up for debate. Those under 29-years-old began to question if they were aliens. Three people in black could have been aliens, from somewhere else, or just mentally stressed from the ever present spheres. Were oddity and social alienation a sign of being an extraterrestrial or just being odd and lonely?
The acting was not great, but better than most low budget films. Romantic love, heartbreak, an alien cult, dream interpretation, burned-out workers, even Korean reunification all made appearances. It was not unusual for characters to break out in dance and/or song. Luckily, the music was actually quite pleasing.
I have no idea what director Jude Chun wanted me to take away from this strange film. What I got from it was how we all deal with the “aliens” in our midst, those who are “different” or foreign. Do the “aliens” in a foreign place still dream of home? Are we welcoming, seeking to learn from each other and peacefully co-existing or do we shut down and listen to our lizard brains and determine we must protect ourselves from the “aliens” and their different ways of thinking, looking, and doing things whether in society or in our personal lives? Chun didn’t spoon feed his vision. The film dragged in places and was obviously not well funded yet it provided interesting existential perspectives and what alien film couldn’t be improved by song and dance?
17 February 2025
Was this review helpful to you?
"Each heart is different."
A few months after Naruse Mikio directed his first talkie, he created this film based on a play titled, “Two Wives.” Two Wives described the film much better than the submissive order “Wife! Be a Rose!” Had it not been a Naruse film, I might have skipped this title. I’ve learned to trust him where women were concerned, he was much more forward thinking than other directors at this time. While billed as a comedy, there was disappointment and pain behind the upbeat music and smiles.Kimiko and Seiji are planning to marry, all they need now is for the fathers to meet and hash out the transaction. The only problem being, Kimiko’s father left home to live with a geisha in the mountains around Nagano fifteen years ago. Aside from a meager money order that arrives each month, Kimiko and her mother have not heard from him in a long time. Kimiko works in an office supplying much of their income while her mother writes poetry for the newspaper and teaches a poetry class for free. Etsuko spends money freely on her own clothes, living in her own little world. Kimiko determines to visit her father and bring him back to not only arrange her marriage but also to free him from the clutches of Oyuki, the woman he is living with.
In Naruse’s first talkie five months prior, the sister who dressed in Western style clothes was derided as a “modern girl.” Kimiko often dressed in Western clothing and was portrayed as independent and yet also filial. Despite Kimiko believing that “Men like a wife who acts childish and cajoling…or motherly and protective,” she tended to be neither. Seiji admired her fierceness and had no problem with her traveling alone across the country to cross swords with the harridan controlling her father. “I guess you’re as tough as she is.” When things turn out to be different than what she believed, Kimiko rolled with the punches and opened her mind and heart. There was still heartbreak aplenty when attempting to be filial to two parents with different hearts. Many a child of divorced parents has had to come to terms with adults who cannot live together.
Unlike Three Sisters with Maiden Hearts where Naruse overused the new ability to employ sound, in this film, the music flowed evenly and organically throughout the story. The acting for 1935 was exemplary, forgoing melodramatic tics. Chiba Sachiko as Kimiko conveyed the longing and despair behind her smile as she dealt with conflicting emotions regarding her father and mother. With Naruse’s characters, still waters ran deep, belying powerful eddies and currents guiding their actions.
Wife! Be a Rose! could easily be reworked in the present as a film about the different ways families exist and coexist. Love doesn’t always come in the package we expect nor does love make every relationship work. Sometimes love means acceptance of who people are and also being able to let go.
7 February 2025
Was this review helpful to you?
"How did you end up here?"
Wen Shi Pei’s directorial debut, Are You Lonesome Tonight?, was an impressive first film. The sets and color scheme were heavily reminiscent of Wong Kar Wai. Shadows, rain, green, orange, and red lighting set the mood as much as the rundown sets. Eddie Peng and Sylvia Chang gave strong performances as the disparate main characters brought together by a husband’s death.Wang Xue Ming is forced to take a detour late one night when a bull gets loose and refuses to move out of the road. One unassuming turn leads to cause and effect with Wang becoming entwined with the widow Liang and a group of unsavory businessmen.
The film began in the future with Wang in prison, lamenting his lack of memory of previous events. The story bounced back and forth repeatedly and you have to stay sharp to keep up with when the events were happening. Significant details unwound, revealing themselves in retelling the story from different angles. Even with those clues laid out, other secrets stayed buried.
Eddie Peng, in an unglamorous role with beaten face and unkempt hair, had the strongest performance I’ve seen him give until now. Enigmatic, and feeling guilty over the incident on a dark road, Wang kept his emotions tightly hidden. Sylvia Chang also shone as the widow who wasn’t particularly sad to lose her husband, yet also had no idea what to do with her life in an empty apartment. Wang Yan Hui as scruffy Detective Chen, had less to do, as he attempted to discover how Mr. Liang ended up dead. The stars were Peng and Chang in an unusual friendship.
AYLT dizzyingly overused the flashforward, flashback, and flashsideways for me, yet I still found the film’s style fascinating. The criminal mystery was largely left untouched, yet I wasn’t overly concerned so caught up was I in Wang and Liang’s strange give and take. At times slow, at times perplexing, and at times gorey, Are You Lonesome Tonight was an excellent first film for Wen Shi Pei.
“Do the chairs in your parlor seem empty and bare?
Do you gaze at your doorstep and picture me there?
Is your heart filled with pain, shall I come back again?
Tell me dear, are you lonesome tonight?”
4 February 2025
Was this review helpful to you?
"We're rich bums"
Lolo and the Kid might be a polarizing film due to its subject matter. An older man uses the orphan he raised to con childless couples. They live day to day, spending their ill-gotten gains at the amusement park and karaoke bars.Whenever Lolo runs short of cash, he leaves Kid near an ice cream cart with some money and goes to Childless Couple Lane to scout out people who will empathize with the small waif and want to take him in. The two scam what they can out of the caring clueless couples before moving on. After they blow through their money, they find another sympathetic couple to rob. Lolo’s conscience begins to get the best of him, knowing that Kid wants to go to school.
Lolo’s words and actions were highly contradictory. He divided the world into those who cheat and those who get cheated. Portrayed as a kindly grandfather character, he taught Kid to be respectful of others and to not curse. All of which seemed preposterous when he had Kid literally steal from the couples they scammed. What troubled me the most were the couples the duo targeted. Emotionally vulnerable couples who could not conceive or have children of their own, were dangled a desired child to care for and then woke up the next day having been robbed. Lolo’s love for the abandoned boy could not make up for the harm they caused. And ultimately, that’s what the film focused on. Lolo was uneducated and poor and the childless couples, or in the one case, a single woman who had overcome a traumatic past, were rich and therefore their feelings did not matter. If they had been evil child dealers or abusive tyrants instead of people who sought to keep a child from sleeping on the streets, Lolo’s actions wouldn’t have been as reprehensible. Also, the repetitive scams began to make this 90 minute film feel much longer.
The two main actors actually did a fine job, especially little Euwenn Mikaell as Kid. While the con artist's sense of moral and parental responsibility finally ran him down like a Mack truck, I struggled to feel moved. And the director worked hard to emotionally manipulate me in nearly every scene. Lolo and the Kid had a few compelling moments, but for the most part, in trying to make everyone involved kind and caring, the film lost its edge and unintentionally made Lolo’s schemes sadistic.
3 February 2025
Trigger warning: Kenny Roger's "Through the Years" was sung badly and often throughout the film.
Was this review helpful to you?
"Listening to your story isn't part of my job"
The Assassin aka Night of the Assassin appeared to have a small budget. The story relied heavily on Shin Hyun Joon as the titular character to carry this flick. The production values were low but there was still enjoyment to be had while watching it.Yi Nan is a fierce and feared assassin who works for the highest bidder during a turbulent and chaotic time. He doesn’t make moral judgements on the targets, he just quickly and effectively takes them out. After visiting a doctor, he discovers he has a serious heart condition. It’s not long before everyone knows and “the weakened tiger is attacked by wolves.” Yi Nan disappears into the mountains to look for a specific herb that can heal his condition. He ends up working at a local tavern for a widow and her young son. In a corrupt world, he is drawn back into dealing out death. His only fear is that Death may finally catch up with him before he can accomplish his last mission.
Shin Hyun Joon made for an imposing assassin. I had trouble buying his overnight transformation but it was still fun to watch him avenge a critical death. Kim Min Kyung gave a nicely rounded performance as the widow who helps a stranger out and falls into danger with her son. The supporting cast gave wildly over-the-top performances. If not for the high body count this film almost amounted to a comedic parody of the genre. The villains, of which there were many, lacked any sense of menace, especially a female assassin and her strange voodoo abilities. The film veered wildly from comedy to deathly serious. The fight choreography ranged from quite good to blurry, shaky, what the heck is happening.
Night of the Assassin’s production values were quite low, most Kdramas have better camera work. There was a moral to the story, assassins were not to be glorified for they killed the innocent and the guilty. Yet Yi Nan’s skill with a sword and cooking knife were indeed glorified. If you don’t mind a low budget film and are in the mood for a strange rampage fueled assassin flick, The Assassin might fill that small niche.
20 January 2025
Was this review helpful to you?
"Samurai aren't as great as you think"
“Kill!” was a 1968 film adapted from the same book Kurosawa Akira used for Sanjuro (1962). Just as with Sanjuro, “Kill!” had a hero who didn’t want to kill yet ended up having to take lives to save lives. The honor of the samurai was called into question as Genta, the itinerant ronin, found himself working to rescue a handful of loyal samurai from a corrupt system. With his wild eyes and hair, Nakadai Tatsuya perfectly played the humorous yet lethal swordsman.Tabata is a farmer who sold his land to buy samurai swords and is in town seeking a yakuza family that is hiring swordsmen. More than anything he wants to be a samurai. Well, almost anything. He hasn’t eaten in five days when he arrives in a town nearly destroyed by a recent revolt. Tabata meets another hungry ronin named Genta, as they both eye a scrawny chicken that would have made Moana’s Heihei* proud. In town are seven dedicated samurai who kill a corrupt official that has stepped out of line with their lord. The local chamberlain, Ayuzawa Tamiya, gave his tacit agreement for the assassination. Tabata goes to work for Ayuzawa while Genta sees a plot that may cost the seven loyal samurai their lives and begins to covertly work on a way to extricate them from the trap they have fallen into.
The first 30 minutes of the film felt needlessly complicated, though I suppose when introducing two dozen characters it was inevitable for there to be confusion. Nakadai Tatsuya played Genta, the wandering ronin who gave up being a samurai two years prior. Quick witted and quick with a sword, it was hard not to like Genta, especially as played by Nakadai. I have come to truly appreciate his wild eyes and cocksure smile. He looked like he was having great fun playing the skilled samurai masquerading as a vagrant. Takahashi Etsushi’s Tabata had a heart and physical strength greater than his brain power. Though not the sharpest katana in a battle, he made up for his lack in enthusiasm. The two unkempt swordsmen would find themselves on opposite sides but never truly enemies.
“Kill!” had numerous humorous moments yet never more than dipped its toe into slapstick. Other samurai films were alluded to without diving into parody. The samurai fell into “the good guys,”“the bad guys,” and “the average guys,” who were just trying to make a living. Swords, arrows, and bullets didn’t care which category the men belonged to and there was one death that particularly hurt. “Kill!” had several narrative issues, but I enjoyed it based mostly on Nakadai’s performance. The unlikely duo of farmer and reluctant samurai was entertaining as they attempted to save the “good guys" and “the average guys” all while trying to stay alive themselves. Once the film found its footing this chambara was entertaining. If you liked Yojimbo or Sanjuro, “Kill!” is one to try.
14 January 2025
*Spoiler---The chicken lives!
Was this review helpful to you?
"One can't hide his true self even after his role has changed"
Time can’t erase some memories, memories seared deep into a person’s psyche. The kind of trauma that refuses to be healed. For Han Pil Ju who lost his family and more during the Japanese occupation, time could not take away his need for vengeance against the collaborators who prospered and were hailed as heroes in the years that followed.Han Pil Ju is working his last day at TGIF Fridays and it’s the last day he will be known as “Freddie” at the restaurant. He’s made a friend of In Gyu aka “Jason.” Freddie hires Jason to drive him around in an unregistered red Porsche sports car for important errands. It turns out that his errands involve killing the men who were responsible for the deaths of his family members. All of the men have prospered and hidden their traitorous pasts during the Japanese occupation. Jason gets pulled into Freddie’s revenge scheme as much as he would like to be free from it.
Fifty-three-year-old Lee Sung Min was extraordinary as the eighty-year-old with Alzheimer’s determined to clean the slate in his remaining days. How deep does a wound have to be for a man to hold on to vengeance for over 50 years? Pil Ju’s memory ebbed and flowed, yet he was still coherent enough to remember intricate details of his schemes. He avoided the Inigo Montoya trope, “You killed my father, prepare to die,” though at times was close to it. Nam Joo Hyuk gave In Gyu a naivete and ultimately solidarity with the old man. The two built a nice rapport with each other, something the success of the film hinged on.
Most of the targets were successful and wealthy enough that they couldn’t understand anyone not being able to let go of the past. “It’s illogical to talk about justice when one can’t protect his own family.” Blaming the victims for being beaten to death, dying from forced labor, or the consequences of being forced to be one of the comfort women was probably not the wisest course of action. They couldn’t see or didn’t care that their wealth and power were built on the blood of their own people they caused to be spilled.
Remember didn’t excuse Pil Ju’s actions any more than he did himself. What it did show was that there was still a national trauma that had not yet fully healed. As generations pass on, the memory may fade. “There is no future for people stuck in the past.” It was hard for Pil Ju to move on when justice had yet to be served and the individual tragedies had been dismissed. Remember kept the action moving, and at 2 hours felt tightly directed and well-acted. There were plot holes and using a bright red Porsche wasn’t the best getaway car, but it was an emotionally gripping film from start to finish.
9 January 2025
Was this review helpful to you?
"An actor's revenge certainly is dramatic"
An Actor’s Revenge was actor Hasegawa’s 300th film and a remake of his 1935 film by the same name. Both life and the play were equally theatrical and equally theatrically shot. The gender bending characters made me wonder if life was just an extension of the kabuki play or if it was a progressive look at gender.Nakamura Yukinojo is a famous onnagata who stays in character on stage and off. At the age of seven, his parents killed themselves when a friend colluded with two powerful men to destroy his father’s company, leaving the family destitute. One of the conspirators, Sansai, the ex-magistrate of Nagasaki and his daughter Namiji attend Yukinojo’s play. Kawaguchiya, the perfidious employee and co-conspirator also is there. Namiji is the shogun’s concubine but falls hopelessly in love with Yukinojo, becoming ill when he refuses to meet with her. Fellow merchant Hiromiya is also revealed to be an accomplice as he takes an interest in Yukinojo. The actor plots to use innocent Namiji to bring the 3 men down. He's aided by a lookalike Robin Hood thief, Yamitaro.
The hardest hurdle to scale was actor Hasegawa Kazuo. He was 55 at the filming of this movie and playing a character in his 20’s. When much younger Namiji fell instantly in love and called him “beguilingly beautiful” did she see beyond his paunchy middle-aged appearance? The female thief Ohatsu who was criticized for being too masculine and had never loved a man also fell in love with Yukinojo. Perhaps because the actor was decidedly feminine? Meanwhile, Yukinojo and his troupe leader Kikunojo seemed to have a deeper than friendship relationship. The thief also played by Hasegawa had sworn off all relationships with women though he was intrigued by Ohatsu. Whether it was the intention or not, love appeared fluid, flowing as it willed irrespective of gender or appearance.
Yukinojo’s revenge was nothing exceptional, but satisfying. What made this film enjoyable for me were the creative filming techniques that made all of life a stage. Trees in the forest were obviously fake as Yukinojo was confronted by an old foe. Director Ichikawa used dramatic filming techniques with inky blackness and strategic spotlights. Though it could make the action difficult to follow, the style was intriguing. Yamitaro’s identical appearance was perplexing. At first, I though perhaps Yukinojo had a split personality, especially when Yamitaro commented personally on the actor’s actions. In the end, I guess he was just one more narrator. Ichikawa made use of the famous benshi, Tokugawa Musei, as the primary narrator for the film.
An Actor’s Revenge was an entertaining kabuki experience on the stage and off. Hasegawa’s age could be difficult to overcome, but I suppose age wasn’t important on the stage so it wasn’t important off the stage in this film either. More style than substance and your enjoyment will be whether that off-beat, at times humorous style appeals to you. The suspension of reality and theater acting could be hit and miss with me, in the end it was worth the ride.
4 January 2025
Was this review helpful to you?
"It's not up to others to decide what kind of human being you are"
Born with It was a short eye-opening film for people who live comfortably in the majority and confirmation of what people who are declared “different” already know. This film didn’t pull any punches and stripped away all the sugary, feel-good moments another film might have doled out to make people feel better and less uncomfortable with reality.Keisuke begins school late in the year in a rural area after moving from Tokyo with his mom. Born to a Japanese mother and black father, he is in the only child of color in his class. Fellow student, Kento, can’t believe he can speak Japanese. “I am Japanese,” Keisuke tells him. In a thoroughly homogenous society Keisuke is viewed suspiciously. Kento declares that he must have AIDS for his skin to be that color and tells everyone to not associate with him.
I live in a multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, multi-religious society. Bi-racial children of all sorts are nothing unusual. That doesn’t mean that they don’t face prejudice. But the level of ignorance and otherism of these children was off the charts. Unfortunately, it’s not only these Japanese students who are cruel. I watched a drama not long ago that had a Japanese actor of color named Anthony in it. I saw numerous derogatory comments about him from people not from Japan. He too, was born of a Japanese mother and African American father. His father died when he was a toddler. His mother married a Japanese man when he was five. As he said of growing up, “There were girls and boys and then there was me, this mysterious black being.” Much like this child, he was thoroughly Japanese except for his looks, and in a monoethnic society it was hard to fit in.
Keisuke’s mom did not coddle him or tell him everything was going to be okay. She told him he could not let others decide who he was, he would have to figure that out for himself and fight his own battles. A heartbreaking reality for such a beautiful, kind child. While this short film showed the ignorance some people of color face in Japan, it’s also a reminder for the rest of us to open our hearts and minds to the “others” in our own communities. Regardless of race or sex we are all humans and want to be treated with respect and to be accepted. Born with It showed how much more some people have to fight daily to achieve that baseline of humane treatment.
24 December 2024
Was this review helpful to you?
"A heart that loves, never gets tired"
Homecoming was a part of the Jollibee’s Valentine 2018 series and a follow-up to its immensely popular short film/commercial Crush. Rather than a sequel, it filled out Crush’s story of young love that had a rocky start.Our nameless college student who delivered Jollibee hamburgers with encouraging notes to the female student he had a crush on in Crush, had to watch his love interest interacting with her boyfriend. As was hinted at in the first short, the boyfriend was very self-involved. The stalkerish good guy was always there to lend a hand or emotional support when she needed it. The beginning of the film showed they ended up together. The vignettes played out the progress of their relationship as she observed his generosity and tenacity.
I liked this short film/commercial better as it showed his actions that won her over and not just leaving her cold hamburgers with anonymous notes everywhere which I didn’t find particularly romantic. I won’t leave a drink unattended in a crowd, I’m certainly not going to eat a hamburger that appeared in my locker or on a bench. Here he stepped up to help her and was attentive to her needs. Jollibee was not forgotten after they became a couple. Even in old age she still loved Jollibee burgers and he was still Johnny on the spot to make sure she always had one on hand. The pragmatist in me wanted to mention she might need to have her cholesterol checked.
Homecoming was a cute follow-up to Crush that helped better explain how this couple based on a real story found their way to each other through a devotion to Jollibee burgers. Homecoming felt less contrived with a less problematic approach to romance than the first short film. As always, beauty and true love are in the eye of the beholder.
22 December 2024
Was this review helpful to you?
When a smiling distraught man approaches a woman, she assumes he has something nefarious in mind as does a male witness. As does the police officer who questions everyone except the wounded man. When Haneul, the wounded man, finally breaks down and gets their attention the story comes tumbling out.
In this world there are many biases that cloud our vision and interpretation of events. Every experience is sifted through cultural and social prejudices and norms often to the detriment of marginalized people. The Viewpoint showed the weakness of eye witness accounts and the harm caused by assumptions. A short and powerful reminder to open our minds to those we feel are “different” from us.
15 December 2024
Was this review helpful to you?
Like a rolling stone
Full disclosure, after watching this two-minute film I had to scurry across the internet and look up what sailing stones were. After doing my due diligence, I went back and rewatched Sailing Stones. I came to the conclusion that this was more a video piece of art than traditional film.Sailing Stones was filmed in black and white with zero dialogue. Several expressionless people are on the beach with long narrow tracks behind them. Their ages and sex vary. All stare ahead even as the sound of stone against stone grinds and moves them forward. At long last the sun begins to wake behind the mountain.
For anyone like me who is confused by the title, sailing stones (also sliding, walking, or rolling stones) have been found in Death Valley, California, USA. For a long time, stones were found to have moved with a dragging trail behind them. Turns out when the stones are on a melting sheet of ice, the strong winds can cause them to “sail.”
The disparate people in this short film were propelled in curving trails, victims of external forces instead of their own will and volition. Filmed for 10 CM’s single, “Sleepless in Seoul,” each of the individuals had their own reason for sleeplessness. A pregnant woman, a student, a salaryman, all were pushed about by the ever-present wind. Was the ground frozen beneath their feet or were their hearts and lives frozen as they were dispassionately transported?
I suspect like viewing a painting or a Rorschach test, everyone will have their own interpretation of this short film. I found the concept intriguing.
11 December 2024
Was this review helpful to you?
A bus ride you will not forget
Many of the short films I’ve watched have been heartwarming, life affirming, or poignant. Bus 44 blew those sentiments up in 11 minutes of dismal human nature with a series of shock and awe.Bus 44 travels through a rural area of idyllic lined trees and farm lands. The female bus driver stops for a young man who innocently flirts with her. At the next stop, two men enter the bus with evil on their minds. They rob the bus and make a decision that will prove fateful for everyone.
Director Dayyan Eng squeezed every minute out of this film imbuing the two leads with enough emotions to make them feel real. He managed to hit the Goldilocks Effect with the film not running too short nor too long. Without a whit of compassion, he also demonstrated the dire consequences of the Bystander Effect.
Bus 44 was short, horrifying, and satisfying in a grisly and perverse way. If you are looking for a feel good film, this is not it. Bus 44 showed the dark side of criminal behavior and group passivity. This well made film earned the film festival awards it won.
10 December 2024
***Spoilery trigger warning listed below***
Trigger warning: It’s listed as a spoiler in the tags, but for some people this needs to be more prominently displayed-Rape
Was this review helpful to you?
"In the royal household, they regard their children as enemies"
This was a hard film for me to write a review for. The Throne told the events leading up to the explosive event in 1762 when King Young Jo took his troublesome son’s punishment into his own hands. Or at least part of the events, giving reasons or making excuses for Crown Prince Sado’s reprehensible behavior depending on how you looked at it.Crown Prince Sado is called before his father after a possible aborted attempt to kill the king, something largely frowned upon. The king is in a jam because he can’t execute the prince for being a traitor because of the problematic law that states the whole family of a traitor would be judged, implicating the king and royal grandson as well. If the prince kills himself, his retainers and supporters are afraid they will be executed. Eventually, the king settles on locking the prince in a rice box with no food or water. The story then flips back and forth in time to explain how the two came to this moment of deadly impasse.
King Young Jo prided himself on his studies and discipline to Confucian ideals and decorum. Sado enjoyed art and hated studying. As the young prince grew up, the king became more disenchanted with the crown prince and more critical. When he made Sado a regent, Sado attempted to change taxation and create laws to benefit the people instead of the nobles. Rival factions were not amused and the king stepped in fearing a loss of power and prestige for himself. Regardless of what decisions Sado made, the king ridiculed him. And apparently because his daddy was mean to him, Sado snapped and became a murdering deviant.
In real life, Sado murdered a eunuch and carried the head around in his private quarters. He beat and raped the women in his circle and murdered many servants. Which came first, the chicken or the egg? The serial rapist/murderer behavior or a distant critical father? In the film the Queen Dowager, his wife, and other women seemed to care for him and dote on him so he wasn’t without attention and positive affirmation. It felt like the film was attempting to drum up sympathy for Sado, but I dare say all of the people he murdered and raped would not feel much compassion regardless of the reason for his brutal and inhuman behavior. Glossing over his vicious actions seemed to weigh the scales without all the facts.
The costumes, wigs, and sets were all beautiful and luxurious. The Throne excelled in the poignant performances by most of the actors including Song Kang Ho, Yoo Ah In, and Kim Hae Sook. Song showed how the king was strictly disciplined in his own life, having no leniency for Sado’s more lax behavior. He also portrayed the king as distraught by the actions he felt had to be done for the country and to spare his grandson. Yoo brought out the complexities of this screen prince who wasn’t in a hurry to be king and had his own ideas for the crown. The dissent into madness was believable. Kim played the pivotal role of the Dowager Queen who saw more good in her grandson than her son did.
If I hadn’t read about Sado’s unbearably cruel behavior, I would have rated this film higher. Somehow leaving out the details seemed disingenuous when assigning blame for his actions to the king’s critical conduct toward his son. If you can block all that out and enjoy the film for the quality acting and cinematography, it is a stunning film to watch.
4 December 2024
Was this review helpful to you?
