Kate

you need to realize that this are people's hard work < this is their JOB that they are getting paid for. I am a CUSTOMER. I am realistic and objective. People like and dislike different things, They pay attention to different things, they have different pet peeves.

You should stop assuming people should view things your way - it's not the only correct one. There is not such a thing as objectivity in terms of judging dramas. I am not objective, you are not objective. Expecting objectivity is being unrealistic. We judge shows based on our own standards, likes, preferences.

I have honestly no idea what's your problem. It's not like I rated the show low or completely ignored the good aspects. It's literally positive review with one complaint about ending, which is one of my pet peeves in terms of planning and directing a show.

No idea how you came across my review, but I would advice moving on. And maybe next time just skip any review that does not rate a show you like as 10, since it bothers you so much.

At the end of the day, it's not on me to protect others from reading my reviews.

It's important to point out both positive and negative aspects about shows, so people try understand what they are getting into. Having only positive reviews is pointless, since they would offer only one perspective.

I honestly don't understand. People have different perspectives and opinions, all are valid and important to express. If there are people who dislike endings like this one, they would rather know about it before watching 46 episodes of the show.

There is no drama that everyone will enjoy, since everyone has different taste. Nothing wrong with pointing out things one personally dislikes. I am not forcing anyone to read my review. And honestly speaking, if someone is so easily influenced by reviews, that reading one might ruined the whole watching experience for them, maybe they should stop reading reviews in the first place.

You need to chill, it's just a drama.

Honestly, when you watch it when it's airing it's "fun" coz you can laugh about it with others. But watching it later alone... will lose the appeal lol

I watched and I kept asking "but how? Why is no one reacting? What is going on?" 🤣

subplots surrounding the guards < this was one of the biggest disappointment. This subplot hit the dead end, when it was one of the more interesting subject to discuss. I was extremely curious how they recruit them, what they get from being guards. If they pick people who are willing to do anything for money, how the decide who gets the invitation to the game, and who to be the guard. There are so many things that could have been explored here. I would much rather them focus on this plot line, and not address the "big bad wolf" and the reason for the games in the first place.

I actually enjoyed the back stories a lot. Without it I would most likely get bored since I would be just waiting for everyone to die. That was one of the reasons I usually don't quite enjoy death game dramas - just the games are not enough content for a show, but rather a movie. But that's the personal preference type of deal. I see quite a lot of people have the same compliant as you do :)

Honestly, the set design and the usage of the children's game was such a brilliant idea, because it made the gruesome reality of the game that much more drastic.

While I get the message they wanted to give with the twist at the end, I could not stop thinking: "yeah I truly don't want to hear how sad rich people are coz they have no joy in their lives coz of the money they have". The way it was constructed to present it just did not sit well with me and I did not buy it.

that extra ending scene?! the writer/director is CRUEL < it was actually a reference to a real accident that happened: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_South_Korea_shooting_spree

it was a heavy show. apparently the webtoon is even more heavy, tho I can't confirm that since I did not read it.

So now even pointing out you are bringing unrelated topics as a reply to my comment is being rude.

Funny how I am a rude one for simply pointing out you are bringing unrelated topics into a discussion, but you calling me not mature enough, which is basically an attack on my character, is not being rude.

It's not me saying anything negative about you. It's you who is judging me.

Anyway, have a good life.

Your first paragraph has nothing to do with my comment ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Not once did I say they don't have the right to reply. I just pointed out how they claim to care about the proper way of stating opinions enough to point it out in XingBack's comment, but not in any other comment made in that comment section. So do they really care about the way XingBack said what she said, or is it about what she said. I'm fine with them disagreeing with XingBack, but lets not pretend it's the lack of "in my opinion" that made them make the reply.

I never said XingBack was either right nor wrong, did not bring into discussion her post on feeds. It had nothing to do with my reply to Meg at all.

As you could clearly see, I did not reply yo anyone else but that one user. The focus was on the fact they suggested XingBack should have added "in my opinion" as a way of differentiating opinions from facts. It's hypocritical to only point that issue out in a negative comment, while not correcting all the people who write their positive opinions "like facts".

the "why did you bother with this comment?" was suppose to ask why out of all comments stating opinions like facts, they decided to ONLY reply to this one. As in, why bother with this one, and not any other comment.

I don't see you correcting positive opinions with "Matter of opinion rather than the universal truth", so why did you bother with this comment?

" To be honest, the description was pretty descriptive so I do not know why I am so disappointed with what I watched." < this type of story can be good or bad depending on the execution. Here it was executed poorly, hence many people were disappointed :(

that sponge bath was too invasive < I literally had to pause and be like: did he really just did that? 🤣

About the 5th, you are right. It does follow more of the "older" style, not only in the production value, but also the writing.

the stargazing setting on the water < for sure beautiful! the setting there left nothing to desire tbh. It just looked beautiful.

As for Sun's backstory it would made a good psychological thriller coz they basically brainwashed a child into sacrificing his life for another person and being a blood bank 🤣

This show is badly written Wattpad story < truest statement ever 🤣

I was so sure Pitch would be an asshole at the beginning, and I'm so glad I was proven wrong. Easily my favourite character from the whole show.

Truth to be told... I did not really like either Sun nor Sky. One was just entitled ass, the other was brainwash child... and since none of these had by the end any depth I was just not amused... :(