Wow, I liked it even more than the first season and that saying something. I don't want to wait for the next season but I will... this writer is SMART!
Its a fun show, but what was the point of contract marriage if no one could know about it?Usually you do it for…
This time the act was for an audience of two. I thought it worked really well to convince the ex-wife that they were a "real" couple who wanted to keep their private life "private".
It looks to me like the drama is finished. Did I like it? Yes. Was it better than Another Miss Oh? Not for me. Let me explain. The OG was able to get an amazing cast that made the secondary couples seem as important as the first. In this remake, the main couple had a different vibe but they were good together, the parents did a great job, and the actress who played the "pretty" Ploy knocked it out of the park. Where the remake missed the mark was with the secondary couples especially the "sister/ best friend" couple. As I was watching there was nothing about the lawyer that made me see him as a player and I kept wishing the director and costume people had allowed the boss sister a different look and attitude. (Ye Ji Won of S. Korea is one of the few people in the world who could pull that off and make it badass.) As for the brother/cute girl couple they were just kinda there. PS, For what it's worth, I think the kissing was way in the OG.
As expected episode 10 the even episode tried best to salvage whatever reputation show is left with. When even…
No democracies reflect the counties they belong to. What is a civil right in one country may not exist in another country. Australia, for example, has a modern "tradition" of free speech but with the exception of political speech has no constitutional or statutory "right" of free speech for its citizens. In the USA (a democratic Republic) three unalienable rights are given to its citizens by "The Creator": the right of personal life, the right of personal liberty, and the right of the pursuit of happiness, and The Founders believed "that to secure these rights governments are instituted among men". In other words, US citizens have the right: to personal security, personal liberty, and private property as long as these rights don't impinge on other citizens said rights. Of course, as society changes so do the laws of the country it represents. For example, the US inherited slavery as an institution when it was founded but eventually fought a civil war to make sure that human beings could not be considered personal property.
I don't get people complaining about "too much talking" in this show. The main plot is about the politic corruption…
I decided to weight and binge-watch it, but I did catch the first two episodes before I made that decision. I think what may be frustrating people is that Yeo Jin's loyalty is not with Shi Mok. (I know I thought he had earned it.) It looks like she's being swayed by Choi Bit. Shi Mok has got to be the loneliest character I've seen in a long while and I think the audience misses having someone who understands and likes him as a person.
I honestly think that DO is going to admit the truth in the new book "Last Love". However, I still think he's…
I think the writer may be trying to show that l DO cares more about becoming a family than he does about being "right". That's something I learned in counseling. My therapist used to ask me, "Do you want to get what you want? Or do you want to be RIGHT?". There are many times in life you can't have both..
In this remake, the main couple had a different vibe but they were good together, the parents did a great job, and the actress who played the "pretty" Ploy knocked it out of the park. Where the remake missed the mark was with the secondary couples especially the "sister/ best friend" couple. As I was watching there was nothing about the lawyer that made me see him as a player and I kept wishing the director and costume people had allowed the boss sister a different look and attitude. (Ye Ji Won of S. Korea is one of the few people in the world who could pull that off and make it badass.) As for the brother/cute girl couple they were just kinda there.
PS, For what it's worth, I think the kissing was way in the OG.
Australia, for example, has a modern "tradition" of free speech but with the exception of political speech has no constitutional or statutory "right" of free speech for its citizens. In the USA (a democratic Republic) three unalienable rights are given to its citizens by "The Creator": the right of personal life, the right of personal liberty, and the right of the pursuit of happiness, and The Founders believed "that to secure these rights governments are instituted among men". In other words, US citizens have the right: to personal security, personal liberty, and private property as long as these rights don't impinge on other citizens said rights.
Of course, as society changes so do the laws of the country it represents. For example, the US inherited slavery as an institution when it was founded but eventually fought a civil war to make sure that human beings could not be considered personal property.