Editorials Details
- Last Online: 2 days ago
- Gender: Female
- Location: The Internet
- Contribution Points: 21,428 LV28
- Roles:
- Join Date: January 5, 2014
- Awards Received:
5
44
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
Editorials
Editorials
News
5
44
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
I'm a translator myself, but I work with books, not audio-video material. What I admire most about movie/drama translators is how they can translate sentences in short and concise way. With books, there's more leeway. But with subtitles, I imagine you really need to choose each word carefully and not let the sentences get too wordy. That, and all the while still keeping the nuance. Seriously, you have all my respect!
I hated Pride and Prejudice the first time I read it, though. I thought that it was just an overrated romance book. Well, her books are about romance, but what make them great was that Austen really understood people. Her characters read like real people, not just some two-dimensional archetypes.
"I have many Rolex."
"Where are they?"
"My friend . . . America! I can help you to America. USA!"
This drama is great :D
Great article, guys. Bookmarked :D
Your analysis about the types of reviewers and readers were spot on, I think. I'm more of a seeker/doubter type, so I'm pretty much open to all kinds of reviews as long as it's not too general (e.g. "This drama is great" or "The acting was good"). Sometimes I even sought for negative reviews because most of them tend to be more analytical and specific in their criticism, if that makes any sense?